Friday, August 31, 2012

2012 Presidential Campaign: What Do We Really See?

2012 Presidential Campaign: What Do We Really See?

Having just watched the 2nd night of the Republican Convention I realize the desperation of the Republicans. Even more I recognize the Republican's hate for President Obama. It is a sad fact that their hatred for our President is stronger than their love for and of country.
What we see because of this hatred is a a congress which has done nothing to help this country move forward.  This same hatred has motivated the Republican Party to do anything it can to prevent Obama from making real significant progress since he came in to office. This plan has carried them along with their hatred to now where they can argue that President Obama has done nothing, failed the people, and has shown no true leadership. Sure it seems like they have some valid points, but they don't.
What we really see is a wounded political party that has put together a do whatever they can ticket to try to win back 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue! What we the people should have done and should continue to do is vote out any and all "do nothing" Senators and Representatives!
Simply put, as soon as President Obama was elected the Republican's plan was to derail as much of any progress for America so that by this time they might be able to blame any failures, any slow economic growth, stagnant progress, and any domestic and foreign weakness' on President Obama. They want to create the illusion that America is doing worse than ever and it is all his fault.
It is one thing to disagree with each others policies, but they are lying, hoping that you and I have forgotten about G.W. Bush doubling the deficit and losing all of those jobs they claim President Obama lost. The truth which you can check is that since President Obama became President he has done his best to stimulate job growth and the U.S. economy while the Republicans have done nothing but stall progress by voting against whatever he is for. Even when he has attempted to move on project they wanted they would say no simply to go against him and make it appear that he lacks true leadership.
They hang on his every word trying to portray him as an enemy of the Union, a socialist, a communist, and unpatriotic! Every election we get politicians making promises and do they deliver? Mostly not! What do we do? We fall for the foolishness again and again. Why should we believe a party that cannot get it's own house in order. They want to distance themselves from racism, but it seem to be what their base and core are motivated by. I'm not say that all Republicans are racist, but it is apparent that they appeal to the majority of them across this country.
Let me put it this way; much of my views are similar to the so called republican philosophy. I diverge from it on some issues generally when they become extreme, but for the most part I believe that if you work hard and are self made it is yours to do what you want with it. I also realize that in order for the government to run it needs revenue which comes mostly from taxes. The free market system is great, but it can get out of hand because of greed. Therefore we must have regulations! Who enforces the laws and regulates? The government! The revenue is needed for this and the government thereby protects the masses from those who would scam us, poison us, destroy nature and never pay much in taxes. This is the reality of the situation.
It's just like when the U.S. government passed certain civil rights laws and the state and local government agencies would refuse to follow and/or enforce these laws. The Federal government had to force them to obey. Without the Federal Government there would have been no progress. So we need real oversight!
I don't believe in quotas, but reality dictates that many in positions of power to hire will not be fair and hire those of all groups (i.e. of varying races, nationalities, and colors) based on merit. So we must have something in place to make we have equality.
My point is that the Republicans would be my party if not for their lack of compassion towards the middle-class, the poor, and the elderly. Just look at the racist rallies they have against President Obama ever since the first campaign in 2008. When they have people throwing peanuts at an African-American woman (CNN camera-person) yelling "this how we feed the animals" I refuse to be a part of      that. It is too much of a pattern.
Remember how the Republicans treated an war vet simply because he was gay? They booed and disrespected him. This pattern of prejudice is deep, it is their core and base!
When Romney, Palin, Ryan & company use terms like "our America", "Let's take America Back", "Unpatriotic", and more these are rallying calls and race baiting. I cannot be a part of this and further more I must be against just you should.
If you believe that the solution is to not vote at all then you are wrong. This is what they want us to do. They want you to feel either let down, frustrated, disillusioned, fed up, or all of the above so that you do not go out to vote. PLEASE DO NOT DO THAT! YOU VOTE COUNTS and is needed to combat these lying Republicans.
What do we really see? Poor Clint Eastwood being used and backfiring! We see speeches from Romney and Ryan which were very similar to President Obama's speeches of 2008 and now they are being used against him. The only difference is that much of our problems are self inflicted or made up by and because of the Republican Party.
We see Republicans saying things like 'they hope that minorities don't come out to vote' and, 'I'm here for one purpose and that is to make sure Obama fails and is not reelected'.
By the way Clint...

 

So true....The sad thing about it is their hatred for Obama has a lot to do racisim...& not because of him being a Democratic...This country feels that us people of color are not fit to lead..Its that slavery mentality...I have never seen the Republicans fight so hard against a Democratic President, not willing to come together with any solutions to help better this country.The only difference is Obama's skin color...They will stop @ nothing to take him down from running another term.Its a shame.We as the people will suffer miserable if the RNC takes office.Together we stand divided we fall....Please please people get out there & vote...They are trying to come up with loop holes to block us from voting...Make sure you have all your voting documents in order...!!! Peace FB fam...MAY God bless us all...!!! ~Tanisha Blythe

 ....to be continued.....

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Bill Maher


Bill Maher: Is the GOP made up of ‘magical thinkers’ who mistake ‘superstition for science’?

screenshot maher via hbo
HBO’s Real Time host Bill Maher ended this Friday night episode with a “New Rules” segment that argued that Republicans positioned issues so that they were easily understood by “children” instead of an epistemology understood by adult, critical thinkers.
The grown-up answer to our massive national problems is “Identify them scientifically and prioritize.” The Republican answer is “There isn’t a problem, and anyone who tells you different is a liar who hates America. We don’t have to make hard choices. We just have to ignore science and math. That’s why God gave us values.”

Bill Maher: ‘Republicans don’t like it when single women have sex’

screen shot maher akin
On Friday night’s episode of HBO’s Real Time, host Bill Maher took Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin to task.

Maher’s guests predictably denounced Todd Akin’s idiotic statement that “women don’t get pregnant from legitimate rape.” But it was host Maher who made clear the link between Akin’s mouth-diarrhea and Republican vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) voting record.

This is not a new theory he just made up. This idea has been on [cross-talk] …there’s a whole list of people who have said this before …What he said was, “I used the wrong word when I said ‘legitimate.’ What I meant to say was ‘forcible’ … because that’s the word that Paul Ryan used. Nobody ever refudiated the other part, the part about the ‘magical spermicide.’”

...And just who is Bill Maher? 
William "Bill" Maher, Jr. ( /ˈmɑːr/; born January 20, 1956) is an American stand-up comedian, television host, political commentator, author and actor. Before his current role as the host of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, Maher hosted a similar late-night talk show called Politically Incorrect originally on Comedy Central and later on ABC.
Maher is known for his political satire and sociopolitical commentary, which targets a wide swath of topics including religion, politics, bureaucracies of many kinds, political correctness, the mass media, greed among people and persons in positions of high political and social power, and the lack of intellectual curiosity in the electorate. He supports the legalization of marijuana and same-sex marriage, and serves on the board of PETA. He is also a critic of religion and is an advisory board member of Project Reason, a foundation to promote scientific knowledge and secular values within society. In 2005, Maher ranked at number 38 on Comedy Central's 100 greatest stand-up comedians of all time.Bill Maher received a Hollywood Walk of Fame star on September 14, 2010.
Maher was born in New York City, the son of Julie (née Berman), a nurse, and William Maher, Sr., a network news editor and radio announcer. He was raised in his Irish American father's Catholic religion, remaining unaware that his mother was Jewish until his early teenage years. Due to Maher's father's disagreement with the Catholic Church's position on birth control, he stopped taking Maher and his sister to Catholic church services when Maher was thirteen.
Maher was raised in River Vale, New Jersey, and graduated from Pascack Hills High School in Montvale in 1974. He received a B.A. in English and history from Cornell University in 1978.
Maher began his career as a stand-up comedian and actor. He was host of the New York City comedy club Catch a Rising Star in 1979. Thanks to Steve Allen, he began appearing on Johnny Carson's and David Letterman's shows in 1982. He made limited television appearances including a recurring role in Sara (1985), appeared in Max Headroom (1987), two separate appearances on Murder, She Wrote (1989, 1990), a recurring role in Charlie Hoover (1991) and other productions. He has also appeared in several films, usually in a comic role. His feature film debut was in D.C. Cab (1983), and he also appeared in Ratboy (1986) Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death (1988) and Pizza Man (1991), among others.
Maher assumed the host role Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher, a late-night political talk show that ran on Comedy Central from 1993 to 1997 and on ABC from 1997 to 2002. The show regularly began with a topical monologue by Maher preceding the introduction of four guests, usually a diverse group of individuals from show business, popular culture, political pundits, political consultants, authors, and occasionally news figures. The group would discuss topical issues selected by Maher, who also participated in the discussions.
 Jerry Seinfeld, a regular guest on the show, stated that Politically Incorrect reminded him of talk shows from the 1950s and 60s "when guests interacted with each other as much as with the host."
 He agreed with his guest, conservative pundit Dinesh D'Souza, that the 9/11 terrorists did not act in a cowardly manner (in rebuttal to President Bush's statement calling 9/11 hijackers cowards). Maher said, "We have been the cowards. Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building. Say what you want about it. Not cowardly. You're right." Maher later clarified that his comment was not anti-military in any way whatsoever, referencing his well-documented longstanding support for the American military.
In the context of the attacks, some corporate advertisers found the comment too insensitive and controversial. Several companies, including FedEx and Sears Roebuck, pulled their advertisements from the show, costing the show more than it returned.
The show was cancelled on June 16, 2002, and the Sinclair Broadcast Group had dropped the show from its ABC-affiliated stations months prior. On June 22, 2002, just six days after the cancellation of Politically Incorrect, Maher received the Los Angeles Press Club president's award (for "championing free speech"). Maher was on the board of judges one year for the PEN/Newman's Own First Amendment Award.
Maher's remarks after 9/11 were not the first time he had sparked controversy on Politically Incorrect. In the same year, Maher was widely criticized for comparing dogs to retarded children. He apologized for his comments.
Real Time with Bill Maher
In 2003, Maher became the host, co-producer and co-writer of Real Time with Bill Maher, a weekly hour-long political comedy talk show on the cable television network HBO. During an interview, Maher told Terry Gross (on NPR's Fresh Air) that he much prefers having serious and well-informed guests on his program, as opposed to the random celebrities that fleshed out his roundtable discussions on Politically Incorrect.
As with his previous show, Politically Incorrect, Maher begins Real Time with a comic opening monologue based upon current events and other topical issues. He proceeds to a one-on-one interview with a guest, either in-studio or via satellite. Following the interview, Maher sits with three panelists, usually consisting of pundits, authors, activists and journalists, for a discussion of the week's events. In the segment "New Rules" at the end of each show, Maher delivers a humorous editorial on popular culture and American politics.
In late May 2005, Alabama Congressman Spencer Bachus sent a letter to Time Warner's board of directors requesting Real Time be cancelled after remarks Maher made after noting the military had missed its recruiting goals by 42 percent. Bachus said he felt the comments were demeaning to the military and treasonous. Maher stated his highest regard and support for the troops and asked why the congressman criticized him instead of doing something about the recruitment problem.
Real Time has earned widespread praise. It has been nominated for more than ten Primetime Emmy Awards and six Writer's Guild awards. In 2007, Maher and his co-producers were awarded the Television Producer of the Year Award in Variety Television by the Producers Guild of America. Maher holds the record for the most Emmy nominations without a win, having been nominated on 22 occasions and not winning once. Eleven of the nominations were for Politically Incorrect, while nine were for Real Time. The other two were nominations for two of his HBO comedy specials: Bill Maher: I'm Swiss and Bill Maher: The Decider.
HBO announced in July 2011 the show was renewed for a tenth season.
Christine O'Donnell
On September 17, 2010, Maher aired a clip of Delaware Republican Senatorial candidate Christine O'Donnell from the October 29, 1999 episode of his old show Politically Incorrect on his current show Real Time with Bill Maher, where she discussed that she had "dabbled in witchcraft." This was one of the most notable of numerous controversial statements by O'Donnell that made her the most covered candidate in the 2010 mid-term election cycle.
[edit]Political commentator
Maher is a frequent commentator on various cable news networks, namely CNN, MSNBC, and HLN. Maher has regularly appeared on CNN's The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer and has also been a frequent guest on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, The Rachel Maddow Show and Countdown with Keith Olbermann. Maher has also appeared as a guest on HLN's The Joy Behar Show.
Maher hosted the January 13, 2006 edition of Larry King Live, on which he was a frequent guest. Maher appeared as a special guest on the June 29, 2010 edition of the show, on which CNN anchor Larry King announced his retirement. Maher co-emceed the final show of Larry King Live on December 16, 2010 with Ryan Seacrest.
Since May 2005, he has been a contributing blogger at The Huffington Post.
Views and beliefs
Politics
Maher and Ingrid Newkirk, founder of PETA. Maher is on the board of directors of the animal rights group.
Maher eschews political labels, referring to himself as "practical". In the past, he has described himself as a libertarian and has also referred to himself "as a progressive, as a sane person".
Maher favors a partial privatization of Social Security, ending corporate welfare and federal funding of non-profits, and legalization of gambling, prostitution, and marijuana. Maher is a member of the advisory boards for both the NORML and Marijuana Policy Project, organizations which support regulated legalization of marijuana. He describes himself as an environmentalist, and he has spoken in favor of the Kyoto treaty on global warming on his show Real Time. He often criticizes industry figures involved in environmental pollution.
Maher is a board member of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Before the 2004 U.S. presidential election, Maher became candid in his stated opposition to the re-election of George W. Bush and in his support for John Kerry.
Known for protesting against the demonization of the word "liberal", during the campaign Maher criticized Kerry for being ashamed of the word. On his show, the comedian has noted the paradox of people claiming they distrusted "elite" politicians while at the same time wanting elite doctors to treat them and elite lawyers to represent them in court. Maher supports the death penalty. Since the 9/11 attacks, he has endorsed the use of racial profiling at airports.
He was originally against the Iraq War, and has summarized his opinion by saying that the United States and the world have had to pay too high a price for the war. He is skeptical of Iraq surviving without civil war.
In the 2008 U.S. presidential election, Maher announced his support for Barack Obama. Although Maher welcomed Obama's electoral victory, he has subjected him to criticism once in office for not acting boldly on health care reform and other progressive issues.
On February 23, 2012, after his 'Crazy Stupid Politics' special streamed on Yahoo! Screen, Maher announced that he was contributing $1 million to Priorities USA, the Obama SuperPAC.
Religion
Maher is highly critical of religion, and views it as not worth the bother. He is described as an agnostic, and refers to himself as one in his feature film Religulous. As for labels, he has denied being an atheist, saying, "I'm not an atheist. There's a really big difference between an atheist and someone who just doesn't believe in religion. Religion to me is a bureaucracy between man and God that I don't need. But I'm not an atheist, no." He has also stated that he is a deist.  Maher has also occasionally referred to himself as an "apatheist", saying "I don't know what happens when you die, and I don't care", adding, "there's Atheist and there's Agnostic, and I'm okay with us not splitting the difference on those; if you are just not a super-religious person, you are on my team". He has reiterated his stance in subsequent interviews, rejecting both the certitude of the existence, as well as the certitude of nonexistence of deities, concluding, "I'm saying that doubt is the only appropriate response for human beings." He is an advisory board member of author Sam Harris's Project Reason, a foundation that promotes scientific knowledge and secular values within society.
Maher and director Larry Charles teamed up to make the movie Religulous, described by trade publication Variety as a documentary "that spoofs religious extremism across the world." It was released on October 3, 2008.
Maher is critical towards organized religion as a whole, including Christianity and Islam. On October 29, 2010, during a Real Time segment, Maher commented on a news story saying that the name Mohammed had become the most popular baby name in the United Kingdom. He asked, "Am I a racist to feel alarmed by that? Because I am. And it’s not because of the race, it’s because of the religion. I don’t have to apologize, do I, for not wanting the Western world to be taken over by Islam in 300 years? Sharia law is being institutionalized in England? Well, then I am right, I should be alarmed." He later defended his comments on CNN, saying, "And when I say Westerner, I mean someone who believes in the values that Western people believe in that a lot of the Muslim world does not. Like separation of church and state. Like equality of the sexes. Like respect for minorities, free elections, free speech, freedom to gather. These things are not just different from cultures that don’t have them. ... It’s better. ... I would like to keep those values here."
Maher received the Richard Dawkins Award for 2009 from Atheist Alliance International "for his efforts to further the values science and reason in the world."
Maher was ranked first by MormonVoices, a group associated with Foundation for Apologetic Information & Research, on its Top Ten Anti-Mormon Statements of 2011 list for saying "By any standard, Mormonism is more ridiculous than any other religion".
Health care
Maher has stated that the AMA is a powerful lobbying group and one of the primary reasons why the United States had failed to enact health care reform.
On August 24, 2009, Maher was a guest on The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien. On the topic of getting health care reform legislation passed, Maher stated that Obama should forget about trying to get 60 votes for it, "he only needs 51." "Forget getting the sixty votes or sixty percent — sixty percent of people don't believe in evolution in this country — he just needs to drag them to it, like I said, they're stupid; get health care done, with or without them."
Maher has expressed the view that most illness is generally the result of poor diet and lack of exercise, and that medicine is often not the best way of addressing illness. In an episode of his show about the 2008 presidential candidates' health plans, Maher stated that poor nutrition is a primary cause of illness, and that "the answer isn't another pill." He also has said:" If you believe you need to take all the pills the pharmaceutical industry says you do, then you're already on drugs!"
He has expressed his distaste for the pharmaceutical and health care industries in general, on the grounds that they make their money out of curing people who are made sick by consuming unhealthy food that corporations urge upon the public. He maintains that mass consumption of high-fructose corn syrup is a contributor to the rise in frequency of obesity in the United States.
In a discussion with Michael Moore about the film Sicko, Maher said, "The human body is pretty amazing; it doesn't get sick, usually, for no reason. I mean, there's some genetic stuff that can get to you, but, basically, people are sick in this country because they're poisoned. The environment is a poisoning factor, but also, we gotta say, they poison themselves. They eat shit. People eat shit, and that's, to my way of thinking, about 90 percent of why people are sick, is because they eat shit. Would you agree?"
On October 9, 2009, on his HBO show, Maher debated the effectiveness of flu vaccinations with Bill Frist and stated, "Why would you let them be the ones to stick a disease into your arm? I would never get a swine flu vaccine or any vaccine. I don’t trust the government, especially with my health." Maher also expressed skepticism about the seriousness of the swine flu and whether completely healthy people could die from it. His comments have generated criticism, and his remarks have been called unscientific and even harmful.
Maher responded to the criticism, noting, "What I've read about what they think I'm saying is not what I've said. I'm not a germ theory denier. I believe vaccinations can work. Polio is a good example. Do I think in certain situations that inoculating Third World children against malaria or diphtheria, or whatever, is right? Of course. In a situation like that, the benefits outweigh costs. But to me living in Los Angeles? To get a flu shot? No."
He supports the current abortion laws and giving the terminally ill the right to assisted suicide.
[edit]Criticism of 9/11 conspiracy theories
Maher has been a critic of 9/11 conspiracy theories. On October 19, 2007, Maher confronted several 9/11 truthers and had them ejected from his show audience after they interrupted the live show numerous times by calling out from the audience. The incident drew significant media attention and praise from Fox News talk show host and frequent critic John Gibson.
Personal life
Maher has never married. In 2003, he began dating former Playboy Cyber Girl Coco Johnsen. In November 2004, at the end of their 17-month relationship, she sued him for USD $9 million for "pain and suffering" for alleged "insulting, humiliating and degrading racial comments." Her suit stated that Maher promised to marry her and father her children, support her financially, and purchase a Beverly Hills home. Her suit also alleged that she quit her job as a flight attendant and occasional model to be with him. Maher's lawyers in their response filed on November 23, 2004, in Los Angeles Superior Court said Maher is a "confirmed bachelor, and a very public one at that" who "never promised to marry [Johnsen] or to have children with her."
Maher's filing stated that, after the relationship had ended, Johnsen "launched a campaign to embarrass, humiliate, and extort ridiculous sums of money from Bill Maher." Johnsen accused another former boyfriend of rape and kidnapping in 1997, and the charges were later dismissed for lack of evidence. Her lawsuit against Maher was dismissed on May 2, 2005.

Maher next to his star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in September 2010
Maher enjoys his bachelor status and states that he does not want to get married. On his website, he is quoted as saying, "I'm the last of my guy friends to have never gotten married, and their wives — they don't want them playing with me. I'm like the escaped slave — I bring news of freedom."
In 2005, he began dating Karrine Steffans, best-selling author and former hip hop model. When commentators suggested there was a pattern to his dating because both his girlfriend and former girlfriend were black, Maher said, "People say I'm into black women. Robert De Niro is into black women. I'm just into women who are real, and they happen to be black."
From 2009 to 2011, Maher dated the neuroscientist and science educator Cara Santa Maria.
In 2012, Maher purchased a minority ownership interest in the New York Mets.
Bibliography
True Story : A Novel, 1994 (ISBN 0-7432-4251-3)
Does Anybody Have a Problem With That? Politically Incorrect's Greatest Hits, 1996 (ISBN 0-679-45627-9)
Does Anybody Have a Problem with That? The Best of Politically Incorrect, 1997 (ISBN 0-345-41281-8)
When You Ride Alone You Ride With Bin Laden: What the Government Should Be Telling Us to Help Fight the War on Terrorism, 2003 (ISBN 1-893224-90-2)
Keep the Statue of Liberty Closed: The New Rules, 2004 (ISBN 1-932407-47-2)
New Rules: Polite Musings from a Timid Observer, 2005 (ISBN 1-59486-295-8)
The New New Rules: A Funny Look at How Everybody but Me Has Their Head Up Their Ass, 2011 (ISBN 0-39915-841-3)

CNN camerawoman taunted at RNC because she is black?


CNN camerawoman taunted at RNC because she is black?

Republican vice presidential candidate, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) does a soundcheck during the third day of the Republican National Convention at the Tampa Bay Times Forum on August 29, 2012 in Tampa, Florida.
Republican vice presidential candidate, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) does a soundcheck during the third day of the Republican National Convention at the Tampa Bay Times Forum on August 29, 2012 in Tampa, Florida.



A Black CNN camerawoman was harassed at the Republican National Convention ahead of the 2012 elections on Tuesday. Was racism behind the African American worker being pelted with peanuts and subjected to offensive language?



August 29, the Hollywood Reporter called the RNC incident "ugly," saying that the alleged racist acts from a pair of convention-goers led to their ejection by convention authorities.

Sources say a CNN camerawoman was taunted by the pair, who yelled, "This is how we feed animals" while pelting her with peanuts at the Republican National Convention.

Later, the GOP released a statement that read:

"Two attendees tonight exhibited deplorable behavior. Their conduct was inexcusable and unacceptable. This kind of behavior will not be tolerated."

Obviously, the alleged racism and taunting towards the CNN camerawoman couldn't have come at a worse time. To its credit, the GOP has worked so hard to repair its stereotypical image of being the party of exclusion that largely caters to big business and rich Americans.

Ironically, the same night the alleged racist acts took place, Governor Nikki Haley (Indian descent) from South Carolina, Florida Senator Marco Rubio (Cuban-American) and ex-Alabama Congressman, Artur Davis (African American) were scheduled speakers at the 2012 Republican Convention.

Unfortunately, the matter has not been given much attention in the media, as many consider race-relations a "soft-issue" during an election year.

What's more, issues like abortion, healthcare and the economy are typical town hall meeting topics that both sides seem eager to talk about.

Nevertheless, the taunting of the CNN camerawoman, who happens to be African American, sheds light on the fact that Blacks, Whites, Latinos, Asians, Jews, Muslims, and others are not yet on even playing fields. And while it is likely not a Republican-sanctioned act, racism is alive and well in this country.

GOP convention attendees ejected after harassing black camerawoman


Photo courtesy of Shutterstock.com
Two attendees at the Republican National Convention were tossed from the Tampa Bay Times Forum after an apparently racist incident directed at a CNN camerawoman.
The attendees threw nuts at the woman, who is black, and said "This is how we feed animals," according to multiple sources. Police and convention security removed the two men.
"Multiple witnesses" saw the incident, CNN reported. In a statement, convention organizers said, "This kind of behavior will not be tolerated."



150897048New Jersey Governor Chris Christie speaks at the Tampa Bay Times Forum in Tampa, Florida, on August 28, 2012

Photo by Stan Honda/AFP/GettyImages.
  
Here's a story from last night's GOP convention that Republicans could no doubt live without as they make their pitch to the American public this week.CNN reports: "Two people were removed from the Republican National Convention Tuesday after they threw nuts at an African-American CNN camera operator and said, 'This is how we feed animals.'
"Multiple witnesses observed the exchange and RNC security and police immediately removed the two people from the Tampa Bay Times Forum."
The cable news network isn't giving the story a lot of play this morning, and only posted an item on it afterTalking Points Memo first reported the news last night. Nonetheless, it is probably worth pointing out that the CNN post makes no effort to soften its lede with "allegedly" or anything similar.
The official statements coming from RNC organizers and the CNN brass last night provide only vague details of what happened.
Convention organizers: "Two attendees tonight exhibited deplorable behavior. Their conduct was inexcusable and unacceptable. This kind of behavior will not be tolerated."
And CNN's statement: "CNN can confirm there was an incident directed at an employee inside the Tampa Bay Times Forum earlier this afternoon. CNN worked with convention officials to address this matter and will have no further comment.”
The first account of the incident, unsurprisingly, came via Twitter in the form of a tweet from former MSNBC and Current anchor David Shuster: "GOP attendee ejected for throwing nuts at African American CNN camera woman + saying 'This is how we feed animals.'"

RNC attendee tossed for harassing black CNN camerawoman

Empty RNC convention hall via NPR's Newshour at Flickr

Tuesday night in Tampa, an attendee at the Republican National Convention was escorted out of the building for allegedly harassing an African American woman.

Talking Points Memo reported that a man threw nuts at a black CNN camerawoman while saying, “This is how we feed animals.”

“CNN can confirm there was an incident directed at an employee inside the Tampa Bay Times Forum earlier this afternoon. CNN worked with convention officials to address this matter and will have no further comment,” the network said in a statement.

Bill Maher: Is the GOP made up of ‘magical thinkers’ who mistake ‘superstition for science’?

screenshot maher via hbo
HBO’s Real Time host Bill Maher ended this Friday night episode with a “New Rules” segment that argued that Republicans positioned issues so that they were easily understood by “children” instead of an epistemology understood by adult, critical thinkers.
The grown-up answer to our massive national problems is “Identify them scientifically and prioritize.” The Republican answer is “There isn’t a problem, and anyone who tells you different is a liar who hates America. We don’t have to make hard choices. We just have to ignore science and math. That’s why God gave us values.”

Bill Maher: ‘Republicans don’t like it when single women have sex’

screen shot maher akin
On Friday night’s episode of HBO’s Real Time, host Bill Maher took Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin to task.

Maher’s guests predictably denounced Todd Akin’s idiotic statement that “women don’t get pregnant from legitimate rape.” But it was host Maher who made clear the link between Akin’s mouth-diarrhea and Republican vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) voting record.

This is not a new theory he just made up. This idea has been on [cross-talk] …there’s a whole list of people who have said this before …What he said was, “I used the wrong word when I said ‘legitimate.’ What I meant to say was ‘forcible’ … because that’s the word that Paul Ryan used. Nobody ever refudiated the other part, the part about the ‘magical spermicide.’”

POLL: Was this racism and part of the RNC's agenda or is this a matter about two people and two people only?

Obama ~ Biden 2012

Obama ~ Biden 2012

I think Chris Christie is an excellent speaker, but I was surprised that halfway thru his argument collapsed. And the stage didn't. ~Bill Maher
Obama - Biden

The New York Times called it "mean-spirited," "aggressive," and "intolerant."

They're referring to the Republican Party platform. And surprise, surprise: The Los Angeles Times reported that it was "written at the direction of Romney's campaign."

On national television this week, we'll be hearing a different story, as the Republicans try to convince voters that the Romney-Ryan ticket is on the side of the middle class.

It's on us to make sure the millions of Americans who are just tuning into this election for the first time don't buy it.
Here's just a snapshot of what Mitt Romney's platform calls for:

    -- Turn Medicare into a voucher program to buy private insurance, forcing seniors to pay more out of pocket for their health care costs.
    -- Outlaw all abortions without exception for rape or incest (including a "salute" to states like Virginia that have passed extreme ultrasound laws).
    -- Ban marriage equality and reject civil unions of all kinds.
    -- Won't protect the mortgage interest deduction for middle-class families if Romney enacts his tax plan, even though it helps more than 30 million middle-class families.
    -- Kill investments in clean energy jobs and reject the wind production tax credit, which would cost up to 37,000 American jobs.

"Intolerant" and "mean-spirited" sounds about right to me.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are in lockstep with this platform, but pay close attention to what they're saying up on that stage this week -- I guarantee you won't hear a whole lot about any of that.

Instead, they're filling their free airtime with false promises and baseless attacks on President Obama. We can't let them get away with it.

Fight back:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Tampa


Thanks, and buckle up.

Soledad O'Brien Does Her Job...


The other day during Starting Point host Soledad O’Brien and guest John Sununu became embroiled in an increasingly heated argument on the topic of Medicare cuts. Following his appearance, O’Brien decided to conduct a fact-check his claim — a claim repeated by other Romney supporters. 
The reason this is seen as a rare move on what are supposed to be news shows is that during this campaign many of the reporters are not being honest with the public viewing audience. They are allowing the Republicans to make straight out lies, blatantly false statements against President Obama and acting as if they Republicans are being truthful. Some will even say that truthful Democratic statements to refute some of the Republican lies are simply talking points and/or both parties are using talking points. They know full well that many average lay parsons do not fully understand the term talking "point". 
My point is that they are playing a psychological game with our minds. They are trying to convince us that President Obama, despite his great intelligence, does not know what he is doing, is the worst president and as they say "has no clue". This is not the truth. Enough of what I say. Let's see what Soledad had to say. 
CNN's Soledad O'Brien did something which is extremely rare in television news these days: she actually did her job. And it was the best example of truly awesome journalism I've seen since Katie Couric so deftly gave Sarah Palin the opportunity in 2008 to destroy herself. Perhaps, given the unprecedented polarization and partisan vitriol in politics today, coupled with the right-wing's propaganda campaign of lies and distortion, we just might see a return of the mainstream media as a potent force in this heated election.

The action took place Tuesday afternoon, as O'Brien was interviewing former New Hampshire governor and George W. Bush Chief of Staff John Sununu. With the actual documents in hand, O'Brien pointed out the striking similarities between the Medicare plans of Mitt Romney and his controversial vice presidential running mate Paul Ryan, who seeks to change the government guaranteed health care program into a voucher system.

"But it's very different," Sununu insisted. "For example, when Obama gutted Medicare by taking $717 billion out of it, the Romney plan does not do that. The Ryan plan mimicked part of the Obama package there, the Romney plan does not. That's a big difference."

O'Brien essentially accused him of lying:

"I understand that this is a Republican talking point because I've heard it repeated over and over again. These numbers have been debunked, as you know, by the Congressional Budget Office. ... I can tell you what it says. It (Obama's Medicare plan) cuts a reduction in the expected rate of growth, which you know, not cutting budgets to the elderly. Benefits will be improved."

At this point Sununu, clearly agitated, became nasty and indignant, angered by O'Brien's insistence on fact over fiction:

"Soledad, stop this!" Sununu replied, raising his voice. "All you're doing is mimicking the stuff that comes out of the White House and gets repeated on the Democratic blog boards out there."

O'Brien continued reading from the Romney and Obama plans verbatim, and cited Factcheck.org, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office and CNN's own independent analysis in refuting Sununu's deceptive rhetoric.

"Put an Obama bumper sticker on your forehead when you do this!" Sununu barked.

And here's where O'Brien, following a heated exchange where she demanded "Let me finish...let me finish!," demonstrated that she has more balls than anyone in television news right now:

"You know, let me tell you something. There is independent analysis that details what this is about. ... And name calling to me and somehow acting as if by you repeating a number of $716 billion, that you can make that stick with that figure as being 'stolen' from Medicare, that's not true. You can't just repeat it and make it true, sir."

In punctuating this incredible interview, O'Brien closed by reminding Sununu of how Romney has called Ryan's plan "brilliant."

Imagine an America where the political discourse is not shaped solely by lying, duplicitous surrogates like Sununu but by honorable journalists who serve as a beacon of truth in holding politicians to a higher standard.

Friday, August 24, 2012

Two dead, 8 wounded in gunfire near NY's Empire State Building


Two dead, 8 wounded in gunfire near NY's Empire State Building

A hand sticks out from underneath a sheet covering a body on 33rd St after a shooting at the Empire State Building in New York August 24, 2012. REUTERS-Lucas Jackson
NEW YORK | Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:04pm EDT
(Reuters) - An out-of-work fashion designer fatally shot a former co-worker near the Empire State Building on Friday and then was killed in a blaze of gunshots by police, stunning tourists and commuters outside of one of New York's most popular landmarks.
Eight bystanders were wounded, possibly all of them by police bullets, though none of their injuries were life-threatening, police said.
Officials said that women's accessories designer Jeffrey Johnson, 58, had been laid off from Hazan Imports a year ago and that while working there, had been locked in a dispute with the victim. Police said Johnson had claimed the victim had failed to sell enough of his creations and held a grudge.
Investigators were attempting to determine whether Johnson shot anyone beyond his initial target. All eight of the surviving victims could have been hit by the two police officers who shot at Johnson, officials said.
Several were likely hit by police bullets that ricocheted off large, anti-terror concrete flower pots stationed outside the Manhattan landmark, police said.
Other than its proximity, the Empire State Building had no link to the violence. Mayor Michael Bloomberg ruled out any connection to terrorism.
The shooting rattled an always-busy part of Midtown Manhattan at the height of the tourist season.
"I saw a friend of mine lying on the street bleeding. She was in shock," said Christopher Collins, who said he tried to keep her calm as he rode with her in an ambulance. "I'm glad the cops shot him dead. One less trial we have to go through."
The mother of a co-worker who witnessed the shooting identified the dead executive as Steve Ercolino. Police declined to confirm his identity.
Ercolino was walking toward Hazan Imports, across 33rd Street from the Empire State Building, and stopped to talk to a colleague. Johnson, dressed in a suit and tie and carrying a black canvas bag, walked up and shot Ercolino at close range, police said, and then stood over the man and shot him again -- a total of five shots.
Johnson, carrying a second magazine in his bag, then walked "calmly" a block away, police said, past two officers stationed in front of the entrance to the Empire State Building. A pair of construction workers who witnessed the shooting followed Johnson and tipped off the officers, pointing at Johnson as he passed, police said.
The two cops approached Johnson, who drew his gun, turned and pointed it directly at the officers from about eight feet away, police said. Police opened fire and shot him, Police Department spokesman Paul Browne told reporters.
One officer fired nine times and the other seven times, Browne said. Investigators believe Johnson was shot seven times; his body had 10 bullets wounds, three of which were believed to be exit wounds, Browne said.
Animosity between Johnson and Ercolino had prompted them to file counter complaints with police in April 2011, Browne said. No charges resulted from the complaints.
SUMMER SHOOTINGS
It was the third major shooting of the summer in the United States, following an assault on a crowded cinema in Colorado and an attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, rekindling debate about gun control in America. The New York shooting was different in that Johnson appeared to have only one intended victim.
"We are not immune to the national problem of gun violence," said Bloomberg, a leading national proponent of gun control and founder of the group Mayors Against Illegal Guns.
Bloomberg has often called New York the safest big city in America, citing a declining crime rate that had the city on pace for another record low number of homicides in 2012.
"It's time to get the guns off the street," said Brandon Thorpe, 23, a janitor who said he has lost five friends to gun violence. "This is a tourist attraction. How are we supposed to make people feel safe if they come here and see something like this?"
The Empire State Building is walking distance from Pennsylvania Station and Grand Central Terminal, two of New York's main transportation hubs, and the shooting took place at the end of the morning rush hour.
"I heard the gunshots. It was like pop, pop, pop. It was definitely in a bunch," said Dahlia Anister, 33, who works at an office near the building.
BLOODY SIDEWALK
Mail courier James Bolden, 31, said he saw a "guy laying on the (sidewalk), bleeding from the neck and barely breathing."
"Everybody was crowded around him taking pictures and video, and security guys were yelling everybody to get back, and give him space. He was barely breathing," Bolden said.
One witness said she saw a woman who was shot in the foot and another woman being taken away in an ambulance.
"I was walking down 33rd (Street) and there's a dead guy. I just saw pools of blood. He was laying down and the was blood pooling (around him)," said Justin Kellis, 35, who works nearby.
The United States has had two other mass shootings this summer. On July 20, a gunman opened fire at a midnight screening of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colorado, killing 12 people and wounding 58.
On August 5, a gunman killed six people and critically wounded three at a Sikh temple outside Milwaukee before police shot him dead in an attack authorities treated as an act of domestic terrorism.
This was the second high-profile shooting incident in two weeks in New York's tourist-heavy Midtown Manhattan. On August 12, New York police shot and killed a knife-wielding suspect as he sought to evade them through Saturday-afternoon traffic and pedestrians in Times Square.
The art deco Empire State Building was the world's tallest building for 40 years from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center in 1971.
Several skyscrapers around the world have since surpassed the New York buildings. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center, the Empire State Building was again the tallest building in New York City, though it was recently surpassed by a new tower under construction at Trade Center's site.

Timeline: Major shooting incidents in United States

Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:49am EDT
(Reuters) - Here is a timeline of some of the worst shooting incidents in recent times carried out by one or two gunmen in the United States:
April 1999 - Two heavily armed teenagers go on a rampage at Columbine High School in Littleton, Denver, shooting 13 students and staff before taking their own lives.
July 1999 - A gunman kills nine people at two brokerages in Atlanta, after apparently killing his wife and two children. He commits suicide five hours later.
October 2002 - John Muhammad and Lee Malvo kill 10 people in a string of sniper-style shootings that terrorize the Washington, D.C. area.
November 21, 2004 - A 35-year-old Hmong immigrant and naturalized U.S. citizen allegedly shoots eight people, killing six, while deer hunting east of Birchwood in northern Wisconsin.
April 16, 2007 - Virginia Tech, a university in Blacksburg, Virginia, becomes site of the deadliest rampage in U.S. history when a gunman kills 32 people and himself.
January 8, 2011 - Then-U.S. congresswomen Gabrielle Giffords is target of an assassination attempt in Tuscon, Arizona in which six people are killed and 13, including Giffords, wounded.
April 2, 2012 - A gunman, identified by police as Korean-American One Goh, kills seven people and wounds three others in a shooting rampage at a Christian college in Oakland.
July 20, 2012 - A masked gunman kills 12 people and wounds 58 others when he opens fire on moviegoers at a showing of the recent Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, a suburb of Denver, Colorado.
August 5, 2012 - A gunman kills six people during Sunday services at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, before he is shot dead by a police officer.
August 24, 2012 - Two people are killed and eight wounded in a shooting outside the landmark Empire State Building in New York City at the height of the tourist season.
Sources: Reuters and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Reporting by David Cutler, London Editorial Reference Unit; Editing by Vicki Allen)

Election 2012~ Republican Voter Suppression & Other Dirty Tactics

Election 2012~ Republican Voter Suppression & Other Tactics

The latest polls since Mitt Romney picked Paul Ryan show President Obama still holding a narrow lead of 1-2 points in several key states.1
But, if the election was held today, President Obama could still lose—because of widespread Republican voter suppression tactics in key swing states.
Republicans are purging the voter rolls, shortening voting hours in Democratic precincts, kicking Democrats off local election boards, and requiring registered voters to show photo ID.2
There's no bigger priority between now and November than stopping these GOP voter suppression tactics so that no eligible Obama voter is turned away at the polls. And MoveOn is one of the few groups in America with enough grassroots supporters to do something about it.

Make no mistake: because of GOP voter suppression efforts, local election officials you've never heard of could easily decide the outcome of the presidential race.
The battle unfolding in Ohio is a perfect example. First, the Republican secretary of state tried to set shorter voting hours in Democratic counties versus Republican counties. Voters freaked out and he backed off, setting uniform voting hours statewide.
That was a great partial victory for voters, but the new hours he set are still shorter than in 2008, which will make it impossible for some students, folks with two jobs, and other Democratic-leaning groups to vote. And his new rules do not allow for any in-person early voting on weekends, the best time for many folks to vote.3
MoveOn members are pushing to reinstate weekend early voting hours so everyone can vote, but it's going to require another major grassroots push.
Similar fights are playing out Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and other key states, and come Election Day it'll be too late. We have to pull out all the stops now.

MoveOn is running local campaigns all over the country to make sure local officials do all they can to protect the right to vote.
You might have seen Pennsylvania MoveOn member Steven Singer on MSNBC's "The Ed Show" this week talking about the Allegheny County petition he started on SignOn.org, MoveOn's petition website.
An election official in one Pennsylvania county is refusing to enforce that state's discriminatory new Voter ID Law, and now MoveOn members all across Pennsylvania are urging county election supervisors to instruct poll workers to let all registered voters vote.They have the authority to make that decision—we just need to give them the political backing to do the right thing.
We need county-level campaigns like this in hundreds of places around the country to make a dent in this problem. Can you chip in $5 to help pay for the lawyers, field organizers, and ads we need to win?
Thanks for all you do.
–Ilya, Anna, Steven, Bobby, Stefanie, and the rest of the team
Sources:
1. "Election 2012 State Polls," Real Clear Politics, accessed August 18, 2012http://bit.ly/NlHyMa
2. "Masters of voter suppression: Republicans employ many techniques to keep low-income voters away from the polls," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, August 9, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=279098&id=49415-22437301-wOldDyx&t=5
3. "Ohio Secretary Of State Restricts Voting Hours In All Counties," Think Progress, August 16, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=279099&id=49415-22437301-wOldDyx&t=6
4. "Keystone to Victory," The Ed Show, MSNBC, August 16, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=279100&id=49415-22437301-wOldDyx&t=7
5. "Delco election official vows to defy ID law," Philadelphia Inquirer, July 28, 2012 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=278191&id=49415-22437301-wOldDyx&t=8

Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 7 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.




My friends over at Americans Against the Tea Party put it best when they said, “What does it say about a movement whose brightest “stars” are the dimmest bulbs?”  It says, laugh at them, pity them, but if you want to live in a modern nation of laws which evolves with the rest of the globe, for Heaven’s sake, DON’T look to them for ideas on how to operate a functioning society, since the only thing conservatives have been successful at is proving that everything they stand for is wrong.

Let’s imagine this scenario:  You have an uncle… a loud, opinionated, uncle who’s thinly veiled racism and misogyny is only superseded by his not-so-thinly veiled hatred of gays.  He says he’s a Christian, but never misses the opportunity to cheer for war and bloviate proudly about how merciless he is.   He fights anything that has a hint of challenging his perceived position in the straight/white/male catbird seat, even if that seat came from the fact that the Liberals he hates fought for the Social Security, Medicare, etc. that allows him to live in dignity.  He regales you with factually incorrect tales of American history, despite having never read a book in his life.  He disdains “intellectuals,” and perceives science as a “liberal plot.”  For as far back as you remember – and as far back as the family tree goes – he has been wrong about everything.


You must tolerate him because, after all, he’s family.  But you certainly don’t follow his advice, and you certainly don’t look to him to shape government policy.


But in the United States today, as normal people (non-conservatives) try to undo the damage from conservative destruction and try and create a society that works for all, we are continuously met with the same old stories of the impending doom that awaits if we dare stop following CONS to hell.   This opposition at every turn weaves the old, familiar tales of the American landscape being littered with gulags and mass graves from government death panels if we… say… dare offer health care as a right like the rest of the civilized world.   We hear Paul Ryan tickle the oversized-amygdala (fear center) in the conservative brain, as he paints a picture of millions of lazy bums swinging in the cushy hammock of our social safety net which isn’t so cushy.   We’re warned that rich people will stop trickling all those fabulous jobs on us if they are forced to contribute to the society that gave them so much.


These are nothing but bald-faced lies from bald-faced liars who have ALWAYS been on the wrong side of history.


Here’s a list to remind us that we shouldn’t be pandering to an ideology that is defined by its opposition to progress.





CONSERVATIVES: ALWAYS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY:




1) Conservatives opposed the American Revolution


Conservatives vehemently warned us that it was unnatural to rebel against our Sovereign Lord, King George III, and that doing so would plunge the colonies into disorder.  They assured us, as the father of Conservatism, Edmund Burke echoed, that social stability would only come from the small group of wealthy aristocrats ruling over the poor majority.  Conservatives reiterated that it was the duty of the poor to obey their “betters.”  Their rewards, after all, will come in Heaven.


2) Conservatives opposed freeing the slaves


I know, I know.  Here’s where the sophomoric CONS, lacking the ability for complex thought, will whine that Lincoln, a Republican, freed the slaves.   But as Southern historian Al Benson, Jr. wrote in his article, “The Republican Party, There are NO conservative roots there,”


“It is interesting to note that, in 1860, the Democrats were the real conservatives, while the Republicans were the left-leaning radicals.”


The Republican Party of the 1860’s, as evidenced by their platform, was a progressive party that rose in opposition to the entrenched power structure.  It called for protective tariffs, Besides emancipating the slaves, Lincoln was in favor of progressive taxation.  The Revenue Act of 1862 levied a 3% tax on people making between $600 and $10,000 a year, and a 5% for those making over $10,000.


As Andrew Belonsky wrote for Death and Taxes,


“Lincoln believed that rich Americans should pay more than their less wealthy friends and neighbors.”


But, because they are CONS and want to rig the system in their favor,  they only considered slaves “people” for purposes of counting them in order to increase the slave-state representation in Congress.


Conservatives warned that freeing the slaves, believe it or not, was an affront to liberty – as well as an evil government plot to force hardworking business owners to release their property.  After all, as the Bible tells us, and as Rush Limbaugh later reminded us, “some people are just born to be slaves.”




3) Conservatives opposed women’s suffrage


Conservatives warned us that women just didn’t have the mind, much less the disposition, for politics.  They would, of course, get all hysterical –  and if they’re having their periods!  Well, look out, men!  As Limbaugh cautioned again, uppity women might put testicles in a lock box and upset the “natural” hierarchy.


Even today, in 2012, CONS (such as, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, tea party activist, Fox News contributor, and founder of an organization where Sean Hannity serves as an advisory board member) lament that the worst thing that ever happened to America was that women were given the right to vote.




4) Conservatives opposed minimum wage and child labor laws, the 8-hour work day, weekends, sick leave… etc.


Conservatives warned us that the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established a national minimum wage, guaranteed ‘time-and-a-half’ for overtime in certain jobs and banned child labor, was going to collapse the economy.  But President Franklin Roosevelt countered at the time, “Do not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day, …tell you…that a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry.”  What a surprise!  He was right and conservatives were wrong.


70 years later, CONS are still trying to undo the minimum wage and get those kids out of the classroom and back into the factories of Republican campaign contributors.




5) Conservatives opposed humane treatment of animals


Since Conservatives are too stupid to know how to make a buck unless they can leave filth, pain and destruction in their wake, they consistently oppose any regulation that not only keeps our food supply free of the filth they love to spread, but treats the creatures giving their lives for human sustenance with a level of dignity and humanity.


As a matter of fact, CONS are such insipid fascists that, rather than address and rectify the abuses at factory farms, they are currently working to make it illegal for a whistleblowers to film the abuse.  They have been successful in Iowa at this endeavor.   After all, if a pig’s infected pustules are viciously sliced off sans painkillers, and no one is there to document the pig’s screams, did it ever really happen?


And, as for the filthy conditions in the farms feeding the good old U-S-A – U-S-A – U-S-A that the conservatives pretend to love,  who cares if a few dozen Serfs eat chicken feces and die of E. coli when a Republican campaign contributor needs more profit?!


We all remember when John Boehner’s district in Ohio was experiencing an E. coli outbreak at the same time he was trying to gut more food industry regulations.  The bottom line is, Republicans don’t care if their constituents get sick and die from the filth that Republican (and DINO) campaign contributors are feeding them.  To Republicans, that means there’s one less person they have to disenfranchise out of voting.


But if the survivors try to seek justice or recourse and TRY and sue the corporation who killed their child, their pappy, or spouse… they won’t get too far since the John Robert’s Supreme Court had something to say about it. 





6) Conservatives opposed the Social Security Act


The Social Security Act established a system that provided old-age pensions for workers, survivors benefits for victims of work-related accidents, aid for orphans and widows, benefits for the blind and physically disabled, and unemployment insurance.   Conservatives were apoplectic about this.  They warned freedom-lovers everywhere that America’s next stop would be a government concentration camp.


Never mind that “a necessitous man is not a free man,” as FDR famously quoted.   Conservatives were inciting their ignorant followers to, once again, oppose their own best interests for the sake of enabling the rich to keep treating them like hosts from which to suck profit.


As author Nancy J. Altman wrote in the LA Times,


“opponents claimed that Social Security would result in massive government control. A Republican congressman from New York, for example, charged: “The lash of the dictator will be felt, and 25 million free American citizens will for the first time submit themselves to a fingerprint test.”


Another New York congressman put it this way: “The bill opens the door and invites the entrance into the political field of a power so vast, so powerful as to threaten the integrity of our institutions and to pull the pillars of the temple down upon the heads of our descendants.” A Republican senator from Delaware claimed that Social Security would “end the progress of a great country and bring its people to the level of the average European.”


As we expected, the concentration camps have yet to come to fruition, and conservatives, ironically, scramble to position themselves as defenders of Social Security – still with a mind to destroy it.


These same arguments were retread decades later to oppose the Affordable Care Act.  Being generally devoid of ideas, conservatives just keep replaying the same old, tired, tunes… confident their fear-based followers will continue to dance on cue.




7) Conservatives oppose clean air and water


Once upon a time, conservatives, although still fear-based, greed-centered, and inherently racist, weren’t completely bat-shit, off-the-rails, crazy.   There were some who even believed that the land and environment we shared should be protected, and shouldn’t be a utilized as a toilet for psychopathic corporations to evacuate their waste.


Yes, ladies and gentlemen… it was Nixon who proposed the Environmental Protection Agency, which was ratified by Congress and began operation in December 1970.


But since then, a chain of events unfolded where powerful interests were able to reclaim the ground they were forced to concede to the greater good.


In a nutshell…  After the defeat of Barry Goldwater, conservatives began to follow Lewis Powell’s memo to the Chamber of Commerce – a plan that laid out step-by-step how CONS, and thus, corporations, would take over America.


Reagan was elected and began his assault on the New Deal.  The American working class was transformed into the working poor.


You see, one ironic tragedy of FDR’s New Deal was that it created economically stable middle classes who, with the aid of these incessant Right Wing misinformation machines, were convinced their interests and the interests of billionaires were one in the same.


One aspect of the Reich Wing takeover of America laid out in the Powell Memo was the suggestion that the judiciary be stacked with extreme Reich Wing ideologues.  Slowly, but surely, these judges loosened regulations and undid campaign finance laws and removed what little barriers existed meant to deter the rich from using their money to corrupt government.  With their cushy jobs on the line, politicians began to dance solely to the tunes of their wealthy benefactors who wanted “big government” off their backs so their corporations could, among other offences, pollute the land they pretended to love.  So here we are – at a point in history where Republicans (and some phony DINOS) don’t get out of bed in the morning unless they can attack the EPA, and any organization that We the People bring into being that dare try to regulate businesses from ravaging America like a third world nation.


Faced with the prospect of having to actually operate their businesses like members of a community rather than sociopathic children, conservatives whine that environmental regulations are “job killers.”  As usual, this simply isn’t true.  In fact, environmental regulations actually create jobs.  ThinkProgress reported,


“According to a new report from the Economic Policy Institute, however, the “job-killing” part of the phrase “job-killing regulation” is built largely on myth. Last year, EPI released a report that found that several of the EPA’s proposed environmental regulations would actually create jobs. Now that the EPA has finalized a rule regulating toxic waste, EPI has used that rule to analyze whether such regulations are, indeed, job-killers. Once again, it found the opposite to be true, and said the new rule will actually create more jobs than it previously estimated…”




8 ) Conservatives opposed the Civil Right’s Act


Here,  again, conservatives use conflation and count on the stupidity of their followers not to understand that “Democrat” didn’t (and doesn’t) always mean “liberal” and “Republican” doesn’t always mean, “conservative.”


You see, much like the Republicans of the 1860’s were the progressives, the Southern Democrats of Johnson’s era were the CONSERVATIVES who opposed the Civil Right’s Act.


Matthew Yglesias wrote for ThinkProgress,


“Bruce Bartlett has become so damn reasonable that he clearly needs to bolster his conservative bona fides somehow, and his favored path seems to be things like this post drawn from his book Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past. Bartlett’s point in the post is that most of the opponents of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Democrats.


This is very true. But it simply highlights the fact that politics in 1964 were not ideologically aligned. The main block of support for white supremacy was a group of Southern Democrats, most of whom were very conservative on all issues, and all of whom were very conservative on the issue of race. They were joined in their support for white supremacy by a smaller block of non-southern conservative Republicans. Conservative movement organs like The National Review supported white supremacy, as did Barry Goldwater who was the leading conservative politician of the time. It’s a very interesting historical fact about the United States of America that for most of the twentieth century conservative southerners generally belonged to the Democratic Party. But it’s also true that if you think of American politics in terms of the history of ideological struggle, civil rights is clearly an issue on which the liberals were right and over time conservatives came around to that view.”


But, as Rand Paul’s recent criticism of the Civil Right’s Act reminds us… not ALL conservatives  have “come around.”


We all remember the famous story where Johnson warned his press secretary that by signing the Civil Right’s Act, the Democratic Party of the SOUTH – the CONSERVATIVE RACISTS who voted Democratic because Lincoln freed the slaves – would be lost a generation.  Johnson was being optimistic.  The white racists were actively courted by the Republican Party in what was known as the Southern Strategy where they still reside with the rest of the GOP racists for over half a century.


After all… racist Democrat or racist Republican?  What’s in a name?  To paraphrase Shakespeare, a stinking conservative racist rose by any other name still stinks.




9) Conservatives opposed Medicare


Unless it is bombing unarmed civilians for 10,000 feet, putting someone to death or invading a women’s private medical decisions,  conservatives have always hated anything to do with government.  They tell their easily-led followers that this has to do with “freedom,” and “big government” interference with the “rugged individual” conservatives fantasize they are.   It’s the nice story the “average Joe” CON likes to tell himself on the way to cash his Social Security check, but it isn’t true.  The real reason the conservative leadership opposes government is because government is the only organization large enough to tell the rich to pay their fair share, or regulate an oligarch’s corporations into “playing nice with the plebs.”  Hence, the conservative hatred of anything that government does to promote the General Welfare.


Conservatives opposed Medicare for the same reason they opposed Social Security.  It cuts into the potential profit of the 1%.  It also affords the average citizen the ability to live in dignity.  To the “Master’s of the Universe,” an economically-secure serf is an uppity serf.  They like – and need – the people nice and economically desperate and easily exploitable.   But they told their ignorant followers, “First you get Social Security – but next stop, it’s the gulag!”


Their soon-to-be-patron-saint, and reason the American middle class is currently on life-support, Ronald Reagan actually cut an LP called “Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine,” in which he warned the perpetually dumb that American “freedom” was in danger.  He said, “pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school, where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him.”


But again, the REAL reason the CON leadership opposed Medicare was because they feared it would take America one step closer to offering health care as a right of citizenship – like the rest of the civilized world – and the gravy train would end for those conservative donors who got rich denying people health care.




10) Conservatives oppose Equal Protection Under the Law


There’s only one thing conservatives hate more than a brown person with the right to vote – and that’s an openly gay person.


You see, conservatives are scientifically-verified, fear-based cowards… and true Republican homophobes loathe the lgbt community for the simple fact that they possess what CONS can only envy… namely, the COURAGE to live an authentic life.


Just this week, conservatives in North Carolina voted to prevent two people of the same sex from forming a legal marriage contract.  This is because living in a free society takes a level of maturity conservatives simply don’t possess.  They lack the intelligence to live up to the responsibilities of freedom – which includes ensuring that each citizen is afforded equal protection under the law – even if you don’t like them.


Yes.  It is exhausting to live among whiny children sporting “Made in China” American flag lapel pins, working incessantly to devolve this nation into the antithesis of a free society – simply because they can’t handle the “freedom” they pretend to love.


So, as the President himself joins the rest of the civilized world and “evolves” to the notion that all people deserve the freedom to build a life and contract with the partner of their choosing, the conservatives dig their heals in deeper, once again on the wrong side of history.


We all must continue to evolve – without them.


REPUBLICANS LOATHE AMERICA: BLOCK THE VOTE EDITION

Republican Voter Suppression Image

Though Republicans admitted that in-person voter fraud was nonexistent, a Republican ideologue judge in Pennsylvania upheld that state’s voter suppression law that the state’s party chairman openly boasted would deliver the state to the Plutocracy’s Dream Team, Romney and Ryan.

Lauren Feeney wrote on Bill Moyers’ blog,

“A Pennsylvania judge upheld the state’s strict new voter ID laws on Wednesday. The decision was a blow to voting rights advocates who expected a slam dunk victory after the state admitted it was not aware of a single incident of in-person voter fraud and the state’s House majority leader made it clear that the law waspolitically motivated.

In a 70-page order, Judge Robert E. Simpson, a Republican, said opponents failed to show “that disenfranchisement was immediate or inevitable.” Simpson did not rule on the full merits of the case, only on whether or not to grant a temporary injunction.

Civil rights advocates say the law, which could affect as many as 750,000 registered voters who don’t have the required ID, will disproportionately keep poor, elderly, minority and student voters away from the polls.

Opponents plan to appeal the case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is currently divided equally with three Democrats and three Republicans (the seventh member, Justice Joan Orie Melvin, a Republican, is currently suspended due to unrelated corruptions charges). A tie would uphold the law.”

Read the original post here.{Pennsylvania’s Strict Voter ID Law Upheld
August 15, 2012
by Lauren Feeney

An NAACP-organized rally on the Capitol steps protesting the state's tough, new voter identification law on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 in Harrisburg, Pa. (AP Photo/Marc Levy)

A Pennsylvania judge upheld the state’s strict new voter ID laws on Wednesday. The decision was a blow to voting rights advocates who expected a slam dunk victory after the state admitted it was not aware of a single incident of in-person voter fraud and the state’s House majority leader made it clear that the law was politically motivated.

In a 70-page order, Judge Robert E. Simpson, a Republican, said opponents failed to show “that disenfranchisement was immediate or inevitable.” Simpson did not rule on the full merits of the case, only on whether or not to grant a temporary injunction.

Civil rights advocates say the law, which could affect as many as 750,000 registered voters who don’t have the required ID, will disproportionately keep poor, elderly, minority and student voters away from the polls.

Opponents plan to appeal the case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is currently divided equally with three Democrats and three Republicans (the seventh member, Justice Joan Orie Melvin, a Republican, is currently suspended due to unrelated corruptions charges). A tie would uphold the law.}

As outrageous and clearly politically motivated as the voter suppression tactics in Pennsylvania are, they are just one of the many dirty tricks against Democratic-leaning demographics taking place all over the country.

You see, for all their flag waving, Republicans hate America.

Don’t get me wrong… They like the LAND that comprises America for whatever natural resources can wrested from the ground, profited from, and discarded without care. The unfortunate rubes born on that land are merely tolerated – for the time being. Due to the system of government our Founding Fathers entrusted to us, Republicans have no choice but pretend they are working for these useful idiots – until they can actually permanently eliminate the “problem” altogether by somehow denying them the right to vote – and they’re working on it.
Paul Weyrich, the “father” of the right-wing movement, co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the Moral Majority and other Plutocratic organizations famously spoke to a bunch of Republican (phony) Christians and admitted that Republicans don’t want people to vote. He said,

“Now many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome — good government. They want everybody to vote. I don’t want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”
One might think that patriotic Republicans who sincerely love this country would be equally alarmed by their party’s dirty tricks, knowing that when they rob one person of the right that so many have died for, they rob us all while putting our entire system of representative government in jeopardy.  But, you see, those Republicans with integrity that you may have read about in a history book are long gone and replaced by Stockholm Syndrome-suffering sycophants who sit silently glued to Faux News awaiting further orders to cheer their own demise… and for a billionaire to trickle on them, of course.

You see, Republicans need dumb, easily-manipulated, compliant serfs – NOT an educated, empowered, and economically vibrant middle class. THAT kind of middle class is much too “uppity.” If the United States is ever to be restored to greatness, Republicans must be relegated to PERMANENT MINORITY STATUS – as they were during the 50 years of American history known as “The Great Prosperity.”

P.S. ANY working class person who votes for a Republican is nothing less than a useful idiot for the plutocracy – whose moral failings (racism, homophobia, fear of “other,” ignorance of history/reality) makes them the willing dupes in their own demise.

Let’s Remember, Republicans have committed treason to get their boney, greed-centered, fingers around the neck of power and there has not been a legitimately-elected Republican President since Eisenhower.