Friday, April 27, 2012

Religion

Why did ― Mahatma Gandhi say that “God has no religion.”?
There are a few things we must establish concerning the words religion, spirituality, belief, faith, fact, truth, opinion, objective, subjective and the phrase "way of  life" before we can proceed on with this topic.
Religion is difficult to define. Everyone has a different idea of what it is. Most people simply look in the dictionary or use something else equally simplistic.

Many say the etymology of religion lies with the Latin word religare, which means “to tie, to bind.” This seems to be favored on the assumption that it helps explain the power religion has. The Oxford English Dictionary points out, though, that the etymology of the word is doubtful. Earlier writers like Cicero connected the term with relegere, which means “to read over again” (perhaps to emphasize the ritualistic nature of religions?).
Some argue that religion doesn't really exist — there is only culture. Jonathan Z. Smith writes in Imagining Religion: “...while there is a staggering amount of data, phenomena, of human experiences and expressions that might be characterized in one culture or another, by one criterion or another, as religion — there is no data for religion. Religion is solely the creation of the scholar’s study. It is created for the scholar’s analytic purposes by his imaginative acts of comparison and generalization. Religion has no existence apart from the academy.”
It is true that many societies do not draw a clear line between their culture and what scholars would call “religion.” This does not mean that religion doesn’t exist, but it is worth keeping in mind that even when we think we have a handle on what religion is, we might be fooling ourselves.

Definitions of religion tend to suffer from one of two problems: they are either too narrow and exclude many belief systems which most agree are religious, or they are too vague and ambiguous, suggesting that just about any and everything is a religion.

A good example of a narrow definition is the common attempt to define “religion” as “belief in God,” effectively excluding polytheistic religions and atheistic religions while including theists who have no religious belief system. A good example of a vague definition is the tendency to define religion as “worldview” — but how can every worldview qualify as a religion?

Some have argued that religion isn’t hard to define and the plethora of conflicting definitions is evidence of how easy it really is. The problem lies in finding a definition that is empirically useful and empirically testable. So far, the best definition of religion I have seen is in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. It lists traits of religions rather than declaring religion to be one thing or another, arguing that the more markers present in a belief system, the more”religious like” it is:

Belief in supernatural beings (gods).
A distinction between sacred and profane objects.
Ritual acts focused on sacred objects.
A moral code believed to be sanctioned by the gods.
Characteristically religious feelings (awe, sense of mystery, sense of guilt, adoration), which tend to be aroused in the presence of sacred objects and during the practice of ritual, and which are connected in idea with the gods.
Prayer and other forms of communication with gods.
A world view, or a general picture of the world as a whole and the place of the individual therein. This picture contains some specification of an over-all purpose or point of the world and an indication of how the individual fits into it.
A more or less total organization of one’s life based on the world view.
A social group bound together by the above.
This definition captures much of what religion is across diverse cultures. It includes sociological, psychological, and historical factors and allows for broader gray areas in the concept of religion. It’s not without flaws, though. The first marker, for example, is about “supernatural beings” and gives “gods” as an example, but thereafter only gods are mentioned. Even the concept of “supernatural beings” is a bit too specific; Mircea Eliade defined religion in reference to a focus on “the sacred” and that is a good replacement for “supernatural beings” because not every religion revolves around the supernatural.
A better definition is: Belief in something sacred (for example, gods or other supernatural beings).
A distinction between sacred and profane objects. Ritual acts focused on sacred objects. A moral code believed to have a sacred or supernatural basis.
Characteristically religious feelings (awe, sense of mystery, sense of guilt, adoration), which tend to be aroused in the presence of sacred objects and during the practice of ritual.
Prayer and other forms of communication with the supernatural.
A world view, or a general picture of the world as a whole and the place of the individual therein. This picture contains some specification of an over-all purpose or point of the world and an indication of how the individual fits into it.
A more or less total organization of one’s life based on the world view.
A social group bound together by the above.
This is the definition of religion used here. It describes religious systems but not non-religious systems. It encompasses the features common in belief systems generally acknowledged as religions without focusing on specific characteristics unique to just a few.


Spiritual But Not Religious (SBNR) is a popular phrase and acronym used to self-identify a life stance of spirituality that rejects traditional organized religion as the sole or most valuable means of furthering spiritual growth. The term is used world-wide, but seems most prominent in the United States where one study reports that as many as 33% of people identify as spiritual but not religious. Other surveys report lower percentages ranging from 24%-10%
Those that identify as SBNR vary in their individual spiritual philosophies and practices and theological references. While most SBNR people reference some higher power or transcendent nature of reality, it is common for SBNR people to differ in their ideas of the existence of God as defined by the Abrahamic religions. SBNR is commonly used to describe the demographic also known as unchurched, none of the above, spiritual atheists, more spiritual than religious, spiritually eclectic, unaffiliated, freethinkers, or spiritual seekers. Younger people are more likely to identify as SBNR than older people. In April 2010, the front page of USA Today claimed that 72% percent of Generation Y agree they are "more spiritual than religious".
The term has been called cliché by popular religious writers such as Robert Wright, but is gaining in popularity. It has even spawned a Facebook page where members discuss the attributes of the SBNR lifestyle. The SBNR lifestyle is most studied in the population of the United States. Books such as Robert C. Fuller's Spiritual but not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America (ISBN 0-19-514680-8) and Sven E. Erlandson's Spiritual But Not Religious: A Call To Religious Revolution In America (ISBN 0-595-01108) highlight the emerging usage of the term.


  “Religion has convinced people that there's an invisible man ... living in the sky. Who watches everything you do every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a list of ten specific things he doesn't want you to do. And if you do any of these things, he will send you to a special place, of burning and fire and smoke and torture and anguish for you to live forever, and suffer, and suffer, and burn, and scream, until the end of time. But he loves you. He loves you. He loves you and he needs money.” ― George Carlin
  “For those who believe in God, most of the big questions are answered. But for those of us who can't readily accept the God formula, the big answers don't remain stone-written. We adjust to new conditions and discoveries. We are pliable. Love need not be a command nor faith a dictum. I am my own god. We are here to unlearn the teachings of the church, state, and our educational system. We are here to drink beer. We are here to kill war. We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us.” ― Charles Bukowski
  “The mind is its own place, and in itself can make a heaven of hell, a hell of heaven..” ― John MiltonParadise Lost
  “The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” ― Mark Twain
  “Atheism is more than just the knowledge that gods do not exist, and that religion is either a mistake or a fraud. Atheism is an attitude, a frame of mind that looks at the world objectively, fearlessly, always trying to understand all things as a part of nature.” Carl Sagan
Not Completed Yet!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Don’t buy these products from Koch Industries!


 In the wake of the killing Trayvon Martin ... the company Koch which manufactures paper products is paying for Zimmerman's legal fees because they feel he had legal right to bare arms and shoot Trayvon. We are asking that people everywhere ban together with us and pass this information on and not purchase any of the following items because your money will be paying for Zimmermans lawyer fees. Please do not purchase any of the following items: Angel soft toilet paper, Brawny paper towels, Dixie plates, bowls, napkins, cups; Mardi Gras napkins and towels; Quilted northern toilet paper; Soft and Gentle toilet paper; Sparkle napkins; Vanity fair napkins and Zero napkins.
http://markcrispinmiller.com/2011/02/dont-buy-these-products-from-koch-industries/

Don’t buy these products from Koch Industries!

BOYCOTT KOCH INDUSTRIES PRODUCTS
  • Angel Soft toilet paper
  • Brawny paper towels
  • Dixie plates, bowls, napkins & cups
  • Mardi Gras napkins and towels
  • Quilted Northern toilet paper
  • Soft ‘n Gentle toilet paper
  • Sparkle napkins
  • Vanity fair napkins
  • Zee napkins
  • Georgia-Pacific paper products & envelopes
  • All Georgia-Pacific lumber & building products
  • (INVISTA Products)
  • Lycra
  • Stainmaster Carpet

About

Mission
Our mission is to spread the word about the political activities of Koch Industries, their funding of the Tea Party, and Tea Party candidates, and the ways they misinform the public about global warming and climate control issues.
________________________________

The Koch Brothers (David and Charles) own:

Koch Industries
Invista
Georgia-Pacific
Flint Hills Resources
Dupont
Koch Pipeline
Koch Fertilizer
Koch Minerals
Matador Cattle Company


Koch Family Foundations:

Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch run Koch Industries and Koch Family Foundations, one of the largest single sources of funding for conservative organizations in the United States. Organizations and think tanks supported by the foundation include The Tea Party, Citizens for a Sound Economy, the libertarian Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, Reason Magazine, the Manhattan Institute, and the Heartland Institute. The Koch brothers were the primary funders of Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally in Washington DC last year,which was held on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech. More recently, the public has become aware of the brothers' influence on union busting in states like Wisconsin, Ohio, and New Jersey.

The billionaire brothers have spent more money than any individual or oil conglomerate to spread misinformation about global warming. Many of their "donations" have been funneled through the political process to defeat any and all attempts at creating climate control legislation. In 2010 they donated huge sums of money to defeat Democrats and Progressives in the November election. In addition, it is believed they may have influenced Supreme Court Justices Scalia and Thomas to pass the "Citizens United" ruling last year, which allows millionaires, billionaires and large corporations to donate unlimited sums of money to political candidates without being required to divulge the dollar amount or source.

Because the brothers' influence is in direct contrast with Middle Class values, we urge a boycott of all their products. Please note that boycotts are most effective when retailers are made aware of the reasons for the boycott. When boycotting products and companies, be sure to address the reasons why. Our primary goal as an organization is to engage ordinary citizens in a process of educating the public at large about a problem that affects them in adverse ways.
___________________________

If you would like to personally contact Koch Industries, they can be reached at the following address:

Koch Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 2256
Wichita, KS 67201-2256

email: info@kochind.com

Their website: http://www.kochind.com/locations.asp

Company Overview
Organization dedicated to educating the public about Koch Industries, and to encouraging American citizens to boycott their products
General Information
Administrators:

Nelson Harrington
Connie Reich
Bahni Morrison
Brad Anderson
________________

Basic Info

FoundedAugust 28, 2010

ProductsKoch Industry Gasoline:

Chevron
Union
Union 76
Conoco

Koch Industry/Georgia-Pacific Products:

Angel Soft toilet paper
Brawny paper towels
Dixie plates, bowls, napkins and cups
Mardi Gras napkins and towels
Quilted Northern toilet paper
Soft 'n Gentle toilet paper
Sparkle napkins
Vanity fair napkins
Zee napkins

Koch Industry/Invista Products:

COMFOREL® fiberfill
COOLMAX® fabric
CORDURA® fabric
DACRON® fiber
POLYSHIELD® resin
SOLARMAX® fabric
SOMERELLE® bedding products
STAINMASTER® carpet
SUPPLEX® fabric
TACTEL® fiber
TACTESSE® carpet fiber
TERATE® polyols
TERATHANE® polyether glycol
THERMOLITE® fabric
PHENREZ® resin
POLARGUARD® fiber and
LYCRA® fiber

Georgia Pacific Building products

Dense Armor Drywall and Decking
ToughArmor Gypsum board
Georgia pacific Plytanium Plywood
Flexrock
Densglass sheathing
G/P Industrial plasters (some products used by a lot of crafters)-
Agricultural Plaster
Arts & Crafts Plaster
Dental Plaster
General Purpose Plaster
Glass-reinforced Gypsum (GRG)
Industrial Tooling Plaster
Investment Casting Plaster
Medical Plaster
Metal Casting Plaster
Pottery Plaster

FibreStrong Rim board
G/P Lam board
Blue Ribbon OSB Rated Sheathing
Blue Ribbon Sub-floor
DryGuard Enhanced OSB
Nautilus Wall Sheathing
Thermostat OSB Radiant Barrier Sheathing
Broadspan Engineered Wood Products
XJ 85 I-Joists
FireDefender Banded Cores
FireDefender FS
FireDefender Mineral Core
Hardboard and Thin MDF including Auto Hardboard,
Perforated Hardboard and Thin MDF
Wood Fiberboard -
Commercial Roof Fiberboard
Hushboard Sound Deadening Board
Regular Fiberboard Sheathing
Structural Fiberboard Sheathing

Monday, April 23, 2012

H.A.A.R.P. update



For those of you unfamiliar with the HAARP program, I quote the following from their website:  
"HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.
 
The HAARP program is committed to developing a world class ionospheric research facility consisting of:
 
    * The Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI), a high power transmitter facility operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. The IRI will be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study.
    * A sophisticated suite of scientific (or diagnostic) instruments that will be used to observe the physical processes that occur in the excited region.
 
Observation of the processes resulting from the use of the IRI in a controlled manner will allow scientists to better understand processes that occur continuously under the natural stimulation of the sun."
 
This is a video that explains how HAARP can cause Major Earthquake
 "The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere. These signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The U.S. Senate set aside $15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this ability alone -- earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency needed for earth-penetrating radiation is within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound effects on migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy field to find their routes.
 
As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough, T. Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric heater could control weather.
 
Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating that the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is eventually built to its full power level, it could create weather effects over entire hemispheres. If one government experiments with the world's weather patterns, what is done in one place will impact everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't Play This HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's inventions -- resonance -- which affect planetary systems." (source)
 
 
What isn't mentioned above is the fact that the earth has its own magnetic field. The Illuminati know this, and try to locate their Capitals on the grid where the field is the strongest, believing that the location makes communication with the Spirit World more intense. In fact, almost every city in the world builds its street grid following the "ley lines", or lines on the grid which have the greatest electromagnetic energy. Usually, in the United States, this is Main Street and State Street. Just look for the street where many churches and fortune tellers are located.
 
So, HAARP takes huge amounts of energy directed at our ionosphere and bounces it back to earth. This disrupts the magnetic field and can cause a massive earthquake, like we just saw today in Chile. By the way, many of the recent earthquakes were preceded by colorful disruptions in the atmosphere characteristic of HAARP. 
Recent Chinese Earthquake
HAARP Light Over Haiti before Earthquake:
Even More interesting than the lights that have appeared over the Japanese and Chili earthquakes (sorry no images yet) is the apparent strategic locations of these quakes. An unconfirmed report states that the Russians also know about this "earthquake weapon"
 
"According to an unconfirmed report by the Russian Northern Fleets, the tragic earthquake in Haiti was caused by a US navy earthquake weapon that went "horribly wrong," reports Press TV. The weapons test was originally supposed to be used against Iran but caused the cataclysmic earthquake in the Caribbean country.
 
The purpose of the earthquake weapon being used against Iran, according to the Russian report, was to topple the current Islamic system in the country.
 
Vive TV reports that the unconfirmed Russian report also suggests that the US instigated the 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Pacific Ocean earlier this month. That earthquake did not cause any deaths or injuries but did damage many residential and commercial buildings.
 
The report further states that the system carrying out these tests is the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). The data also coincides with a previous report that associates the 2008 7.8 magnitude earthquake in China with HAARP.
 
Although Russia has accused the US of holding such a type of weapon, a Georgia Green Party leader claimed that Moscow, allegedly possessing similar weapons, caused an earthquake on Georgian territory several years ago." (source)
 
Now for the analysis:
 
1. Japan/Nippon is Moving Towards Breaking Ties with the US:  the earthquake took place the day after the article broke. The video above shows that Japan has been threatened before by our "earthquake machine".  This one could have also been a "Russian" HAARP job that targeted the Okinawa military installation.
 
2. Haiti was possibly a test. Or it could have been the result of the Illuminati Psychopaths to continue their campaign of eradicating the Black race. The lack of an immediate response to the disaster makes this a very real possibility.
 
3. This Chili Earthquake will generate Tsunami waves that hit will Russia and China and possibly Japan very hard. It could have been a US HAARP event, or a Chinese one targeting Japan. I would tend to believe that the Chinese and Russians also want to send the Japanese a message.
 
If I am right, we are in for a whole slew of retaliatory HAARP induced earthquakes and Yellowstonewill be a primary target. 
 
I am almost near 100% certain on this one Folks.  You better make sure you are prepared.
 
 
Fired NASA Employee Talks About A Crater On The Moon
Tue Apr 24 2012 00:45
This is former NASA employee Dr. Ken Johnston talking about a structure on the moon. Dr. Johnston was a former test pilot for NASA who also trained the astronauts to pilot the lunar lander. He later would become the Manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory. During the audio he talks about a certain crater on the moon and its secrets. He is largest whistleblower to ever leave NASA. If you still do not believe what your eyes are seeing then please check for yourself. Here are the coordinates for this crater: : 31'39'43.60N 143'16'09.13E

Sanford, Florida: In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time!

 The place is Sanford, Florida and the time is Now! Police Chief Bill Lee just like Trayvon Martin was in the wrong place at the wrong time! Chief Bill Lee became chief only 10 months ago to turn around a police department which had a terrible reputation when it came to treatment of Blacks and it's double standard criminal justice system. Maybe, just possibly he was making head way and was sincerely doing something to make changes within the Sanford Police Department. The only problem was that he would find himself smack dab in the wrong place at the wrong time. What it is that is WRONG is the utter denial when it comes to race relations! 
 There are those who believe that just because so called African-Americans/Blacks do not make their complaints about racism, prejudice, and ill treatment heard out loud and outside of their own kind that there is no real problem when it comes to race relations. I'll assume that they figure that they should simply put up with it and live their lives as last class citizens. It is only when we make a fuss about it that they notice us. As long as we remain quiet they will continue to treat us with no respect. 
 For some illogical reason Blacks are perceived to be more than likely involved in criminal activity and/or in possession of contraband. This causes Blacks to be stopped and searched at a much higher rate than other groups. To many, even some blacks because they do not have the proper data, it seems to be the right thing to do. Actually this is wrong!! 
 In Minnesota there was a study conducted. Look at what they determined: "Law enforcement officers stopped Black, Latino, and American Indian drivers at greater rates than White drivers, searched Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians at greater rates than White drivers, and found contraband as a result of searches of Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians at lower rates than in searches of White drivers.  Conversely, law enforcement officers stopped and searched White drivers at lower rates than drivers of color and found contraband in searches of White drivers at a greater rate than in searches of drivers of color.
 
SANFORD, Fla. — Several hours after the city manager publicly announced that he had reached an agreement with Chief Bill R. Lee Jr. to resign over the Sanford Police Department’s handling of theTrayvon Martin shooting case, the City Commission voted late Monday afternoon to reject Chief Lee’s resignation.



Mayor Jeff Triplett was among a 3-to-2 majority of commissioners to vote “no confidence” in Chief Lee last month, prompting him to temporarily step aside. But during a special meeting Monday to consider Chief Lee’s future, Mr. Triplett was clearly torn amid a spirited debate punctuated with applause and standing ovations from backers of the chief in the audience. 
In the end, Mr. Triplett voted in favor of Chief Lee’s remaining in the department, once again as part of a 3-to-2 majority. He said he wanted to review the reports of an independent investigation about the Police Department’s handling of the case before making a decision.
Mario Tama/Getty Images
Chief Lee announced his decision to step down temporarily in March, with the city manager, Norton N. Bonaparte Jr., looking on.
 “I am not ready to have him come back and run the Police Department,” Mr. Triplett said. “But I am not ready for this, either.”
According to a copy of the agreement, Chief Lee acknowledged no wrongdoing. In the three-page document, he explained that he was resigning at the suggestion of the city manager, Norton N. Bonaparte Jr., “solely to allow the city to move beyond recent events.”
The agreement said Chief Lee would receive several lump-sum payments on May 4, including one equal to 98 and one-quarter days of pay and one for 217 hours of accrued leave. Mr. Bonaparte said in a brief interview Monday night that the agreement would have been worth $54,000 to Chief Lee.
Chief Lee stepped aside on March 22, after just 10 months in the job, amid local protests and a national uproar that raised questions about why the Sanford police did not immediately arrest George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, for shooting and killing Mr. Martin on Feb. 26. Mr. Martin, an unarmed black 17-year-old, had been walking through a gated development where Mr. Zimmerman, 28 and Hispanic, lived and where Mr. Martin was staying as a guest.
Early Monday, Mr. Zimmerman, who was charged with murder by a special prosecutor, was released from jail on a $150,000 bond. His whereabouts remained a secret — he may be outside Florida — because of death threats, his lawyer said.
Before the commission voted, Mr. Bonaparte said that “the city has experienced great turmoil in the past two months” and that “we are hoping to stabilize the department and continue with this time of healing.”
With the Sanford City Commission rejecting the separation agreement, Mr. Bonaparte, who has been on the job only since September, said Chief Lee would remain on administrative leave, and on the payroll, while the city conducted a national search for an interim police chief and pursued an independent investigation. In the meantime, Capt. Darren Scott will remain the acting chief.
Patty Mahany, a city commissioner who voted against the resignation agreement, praised Chief Lee during the debate, saying he was one of the finest law enforcement officials in Florida. “At least the city has taken a step back and a deep breath,” she said, insisting that the storm around the case was driven by outsiders.
Velma H. Williams, the only black member of the City Commission, voted in favor of the resignation. She said her lack of confidence in the chief was largely based on the department’s handling of the investigation, saying it “brought national shame to this city.”
Benjamin Crump, a lawyer for the Martin family, said, “If Chief Bill Lee had recognized that his resignation would help start the healing process in Sanford, city leadership should have accepted it in an effort to move the city forward.”

Serge F. Kovaleski reported from Sanford, and Jennifer Preston from New York.


Minnesota Statewide Racial Profiling Report- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 

A basic pattern emerges from our analysis of traffic stop data collected by the sixty-five law 
enforcement jurisdictions that voluntarily participated in this racial profiling study:
Law enforcement officers stopped Black, Latino, and American Indian drivers at greater rates 
than White drivers, searched Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians at greater rates than White 
drivers, and found contraband as a result of searches of Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians at 
lower rates than in searches of White drivers.  Conversely, law enforcement officers stopped and 
searched White drivers at lower rates than drivers of color and found contraband in searches of 
White drivers at a greater rate than in searches of drivers of color.
These disparities are particularly large for Blacks and Latinos.  If officers in the participating 
jurisdiction had stopped drivers of all racial/ethnic groups at the same rate, approximately 18,800 
fewer Blacks, 5,800 fewer Latinos and approximately 22,500 more Whites would have been 
stopped in the sixty-five jurisdictions in 2002.  If officers in the participating had subjected 
stopped drivers of all racial/ethnic groups to discretionary searches at the same rate, 2,114 fewer 
Blacks, 428 fewer Latinos and 2,645 more Whites would have been searched.
The pattern for Blacks and Latinos existed in nearly every participating jurisdiction.  Whites 
were stopped at a greater than expected rate in only 8 of the 60 jurisdictions having enough stops 
to determine statistical significance.  On the other hand, Blacks were over-stopped in every 
jurisdiction but one and Latinos were over-stopped in all but 5 of the 43 jurisdictions in which 
statistical significance could be determined.  Similarly, in all but 2 of the 37 jurisdictions in 
which there were discretionary searches of Blacks and Whites, Blacks were subjected to searches 
at a higher rate than Whites.  Latinos were subjected to these searches at a higher rate than 
Whites in all of the jurisdictions in which there were discretionary searches of Latinos.  
These disparities in discretionary search rates are particularly troubling given the rates at which 
contraband was found as a result of these searches, i.e. the hit rates.  Overall, 24% of 
discretionary searches of Whites produced contraband compared to only 11% of searched of 
Blacks and 9% of searches of Latinos.  In the 37 jurisdictions where discretionary searches of 
both Blacks and Whites occurred, the hit rate was higher for Whites in 30 of the jurisdictions.  In 
31 of the 44 jurisdictions where there were discretionary searches of both Whites and Latinos the 
hit rate was higher for Whites. 
The greatest relative differences between actual and expected stops and searches for Blacks are 
found in suburban cities and central cities other than Minneapolis.  In the suburban cities of 
Fridley, New Hope, Plymouth, Sauk Rapids, and Savage combined, Blacks were stopped about 
310% more often than expected.  Once stopped, officers subjected Blacks to discretionary 
searches at a rate 108% greater than expected even though only 11% of Blacks were found in 
possession of contraband compared to 18% of Whites searched.  In absolute terms, 
approximately 1,800 fewer Blacks would have been stopped in these suburban cities if Blacks 
had been stopped at the same rate as other drivers.  If Blacks stopped in these cities had been 
subjected to discretionary searches at the same rate as other drivers, 108 fewer Blacks would 
have been searched.2
In the central cities of Moorhead, Saint Cloud, and Rochester combined, Blacks were stopped 
239% more often than expected and searched 68% more often than expected.  21% of searches 
of Blacks in these jurisdictions produced contraband compared to 30% of searches of Whites.  In 
absolute terms this equates to about 1,600 more stops than expected and 29 more searches than 
expected.
The greatest stop and search disparities for Latinos are also found in the suburban cities.  The 
combined stop rate for Latinos in these jurisdictions was 170% greater than expected and the 
combined search rate was 190% greater than expected.  Only 9% of searches of Latinos 
produced contraband compared to 18% of searches of Whites.  In absolute terms, officers in 
these jurisdictions stopped 640 more Latinos than they would have if Latinos had been stopped 
at the same rate as all drivers.  If Latinos stopped in these cities had been subjected to 
discretionary searches at the same rate as other drivers, 80 fewer Latinos would have been 
searched.
The largest absolute differences between actual and expected stops and searches for Blacks and 
Latinos were found in Minneapolis, the largest jurisdiction participating in this study with the 
highest number of traffic stops.  In Minneapolis, Blacks were stopped 152% more often than 
expected and once stopped, subjected to discretionary searches 52% more often than expected. 
11% of searches of Blacks produced contraband compared to 13% of searches of Whites.  If 
Minneapolis officers had stopped Blacks at the same rate as other drivers approximately 12,804 
fewer Blacks would have been stopped in Minneapolis in 2002.  If Blacks stopped in 
Minneapolis had been subjected to discretionary searches at the same rate as all stopped drivers, 
1,053 fewer Blacks would have been searched.  
Minneapolis officers stopped Latinos 63% more often than expected and once stopped, subjected 
Latinos to discretionary searches 15% more often than expected.  If Minneapolis officers had 
stopped Latinos at the same rate as all drivers approximately 2,200 fewer Latinos would have 
been stopped in Minneapolis in 2002.  Only 5% of searches of Latinos produced contraband.  If 
Latinos stopped in Minneapolis had been subjected to discretionary searches at the same rate as 
other drivers, 82 fewer Latinos would have been searched.
These patterns suggest a strong likelihood that racial/ethnic bias plays a role in traffic stop 
policies and practices in Minnesota.  The same is true for the searches that result from these 
stops.  Taken together, these patterns warrant serious examination.  It is fair to conclude that the 
problems that they suggest are not isolated to a handful of jurisdictions or present only in those 
jurisdictions that chose to participate in this study.  
Although there is more variation in results for American Indian drivers across jurisdictions, data 
for this group also raise concerns of bias.  Across all jurisdictions, American Indians were 
stopped at a slightly greater rate than Whites (9.2% compared to 8.3%).  Once stopped, 
American Indians were subjected to discretionary searches over three times as often as Whites 
(9.6% compared to 3.1%) even though contraband was found at a lower rate in discretionary 
searches of American Indians (19.7%) than of Whites (23.5%).3
As is more fully discussed in the full report, there are limitations to our estimates of the driving 
population, used to calculate the number of “expected” stops for each racial/ethnic group, that 
should be considered when interpreting these results.  The estimate of the driving population 
used here was the driving age population of the jurisdiction.  Thus, it includes people who are 
old enough to drive but do not do so.  Nor does it account for differences in driving habits or 
vehicle condition across households.  The estimate includes only residents of the jurisdiction 
whereas the actual driving population in a jurisdiction includes non-residents, and as a result, so 
does the stopped population.  Because search and hit rates are determined using only the data 
recorded by law enforcement officers, they are not subject to the same limitations.
View entire study click http://www.irpumn.org/uls/resources/projects/aggregate%20report%2092303.pdf