Saturday, May 30, 2015

ISIS fighter was trained by State Department

News Central Asia CATV NEWS/YouTube

ISIS fighter was trained by State Department

By Dugald McConnell and Brian Todd, CNN
Updated 8:30 PM ET, Fri May 29, 2015


Washington (CNN) An ISIS fighter who calls for jihad in a new online video was trained in counterterrorism tactics on American soil, in a program run by the United States, officials tell CNN.

The video features a former police commander from Tajikistan named Col. Gulmurod Khalimov. He appears in black ISIS garb with a sniper rifle and a bandolier of ammunition. He says in the video that he participated in programs on U.S. soil three times, at least one of which was in Louisiana.

The State Department has confirmed this claim.

"From 2003-2014 Colonel Khalimov participated in five counterterrorism training courses in the United States and in Tajikistan, through the Department of State's Diplomatic Security/Anti-Terrorism Assistance program," said spokeswoman Pooja Jhunjhunwala.

The program is intended to train candidates from participating countries in the latest counterterrorism tactics, so they can fight the very kind of militants that Khalimov has now joined.

A State Department official said Khalimov was trained in crisis response, tactical management of special events, tactical leadership training and related issues.

In the video, Khalimov says that what he saw during his training sessions turned him against his sponsors.

"Listen, you American pigs: I've been to America three times. I saw how you train soldiers to kill Muslims," he says in Russian. "You taught your soldiers how to surround and attack, in order to exterminate Islam and Muslims."

Then, in the most chilling part of the 10-minute video, he looks directly into the camera and says, "God willing, we will find your towns, we will come to your homes, and we will kill you."

He then demonstrates his dexterity with a sniper rifle by blowing apart a tomato from a distance of perhaps 25 yards. The scene is played in slow motion.

The American program in which Khalimov participated is designed to teach tactics used by police and military units against terrorists by countries that cooperate with the United States on security matters. But now experts are concerned that this defector has brought ISIS not only a propaganda victory, but also an insider's knowledge of the playbook the United States is using in the fight against ISIS.

"That is a dangerous capability," said former Army intelligence officer Michael Breen. "It's never a good thing to have senior counterterrorism people become terrorists."

"It sounds like he was involved in defending sensitive people and sensitive targets," said Breen, who is now with the Truman Project in Washington. "He knows how to plan counterterrorism operations. So he knows how the people who protect a high-value target will be thinking; he knows how people who protect an embassy would be thinking."

Former Army sniper Paul Scharre, now with the Center for a New American Security, said Khalimov could not only help train other ISIS fighters in tactics, but also serve as a recruiter for the group.

"They're obviously trying to draw in recruits" with the video, he said.

Khalimov was an officer of the primary counterterrorism unit which responds to terrorist threats in Tajikistan, a State Department official said, so he and other members of his unit were recommended for the program by the Tajik government.

"All appropriate Leahy vetting was undertaken in advance of this training," said spokeswoman Jhunjhunwala.

Scharre, who has served as a trainer of Afghan soldiers in Afghanistan, says there is always a risk that a trainee will turn against their American instructors.

But Breen, who has also participated in training sessions overseas, said building counterterrorism partners requires a necessary leap of faith. "There's absolutely no way to beat an opponent like the Islamic State, without training a lot of people," he said. "That's a core of our strategy."

CNN's Elise Labott and Bruce Conover contributed to this report

AP Photo/Militant Website, File

U.S.-TRAINED COMMANDER OF TAJIK POLICE DEFECTS TO ISIS

by JOHN HAYWARD29 May 20150

Colonel Gulmurod Khalimov, trained by both Russian and American special forces to head up the elite OMON police force of Tajikistan, has defected to the Islamic State.

He disappeared in April after he “told his wife he was going on a business trip,” but he appeared on Wednesday in an ISIS video, vowing to bring jihad and “slaughter” to the caliphate’s adversaries.

It’s not clear where the video was recorded, although the BBC theorizes it might have been shot at a Syrian camp. Khalimov, sporting a black turban and cradling a sniper rifle, is flanked by several other Islamic State fighters.

“Listen, you dogs, the president and ministers, if only you knew how many boys, our brothers are here, waiting and yearning to return to Tajikistan to re-establish sharia law there,” Khalimov snarled in Russian at his own country’s government in the video, accusing them of becoming “the slaves of infidels.”

“We are coming to you with slaughter, inshallah, we are coming to you with slaughter,” he promised, using the Islamic phrase for “as God wills.” Jihad Watch notes, as few mainstream media outlets appear willing to do, that Khalimov is paraphrasing Mohammed’s address to his enemies, the Quraysh, as recorded in Islamic texts.

His threat to the United States was an original composition, however. “Listen, you American pigs, I’ve been three times to America, and I saw how you train fighters to kill Muslims,” Khalimov said, brandishing his rifle. “God willing, I will come with this weapon to your cities, your homes, and we will kill you.”

The UK Telegraph notes Khalimov is considered an expert marksman, “and at the end of the 12-minute video he shows off his skills by shooting a tomato.”

Khalimov’s defection will put a disturbing amount of top-shelf Russian and American military training at the disposal of ISIS, along with useful intelligence gathered during the former security chief’s years of working with NATO. It is a troubling sign of the Islamic State’s expanding reach through Afghanistan into neighboring Central Asian states like Tajikistan.

It also hands an ugly public-realtions win to ISIS, as Central Asia analyst Alexander Knyazev told Reuters. “I think Islamist propaganda will now exploit Khalimov’s example in full,” he warned, voicing particular concerns about Islamist instability in Tajikistan’s neighbor Kyrgyzstan.

The Telegraph relates estimates that some 4,000 men from Central Asia have joined the jihad, up to 2,000 of them from Tajikistan. There are up to a million Tajik nationals living and working in Russia, making the possibility of widespread radicalization a major security headache there.

The New York Times quotes Aleksei V. Malashenko of the Carnegie Center in Moscow saying of Khalimov’s defection, “I am afraid that he may open a path for people to follow him.”


The Times notes that “poverty is often cited as a factor in the radicalization of Islamic State recruits, but Mr. Khalimov’s case pointed instead to a different driver: a repressed but growing religiosity among Tajiks of all classes, including the elite.” Experts are cited warning of “substantial support for imposing sharia, the legal code of Islam based on the Quran, and for the idea of a caliphate.”

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Amtrak derailment in Philadelphia

Amtrak derailment in Philadelphia leaves several hurt



NOTE: Those trying to contact passengers on the train should call the Amtrak Hotline at 1-800-523-9101. You should also go to Webster Elementary School on 3400 Frankford Avenue in Philadelphia.

Read more: http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Amtrak-Derailment-Philadelphia--303536331.html#ixzz3ZzNRm62P
Follow us: @nbcphiladelphia on Twitter | nbcphiladelphia on Facebook
At least five people were killed and 50 people hurt after an Amtrak train, carrying 238 passengers and five crew members, derailed and rolled onto its side in the Port Richmond section of Philadelphia Tuesday night, according to officials.
Eight to ten cars left the tracks near the 2000 block of Wheatsheaf Lane. The train, Amtrak Northeast Regional Train 188, was heading to New York from Washington, DC.
"We were rolling along nice and smooth and then all of a sudden we were on our side," said Don Kelleher, one of the passengers.
"All of a sudden it felt like the brakes were hit hard and then our car," said Michael Black, another passenger. "We were third from the last, just slowly started going over to the side. I tried to just brace my arm against it and then just got off."
Mayor Michael Nutter confirmed at least five people were killed in the derailment during a news conference Tuesday night.
"This was an absolute disastrous mess," Nutter said. "I have never seen anything like it in my life. Many of these folks are not from Philadelphia. People looking for loved ones should go to Webster Elementary School."
Webster Elementary School is located on 3400 Frankford Avenue in Philadelphia.
Nutter, who said the incident was a "Level 3 mass casualty event," did not speak on a possible cause.
"We do not know what happened here," he said. "We're not going to try to speculate about that."
Officials have not yet revealed the identity of the deceased victims.
Some of the injured survivors walked away with scratches and bruises while others had to be loaded onto stretchers by firefighters and paramedics. At least six of the survivors are in critical condition while 43 were treated for less critical injuries, according to officials.
Officials also say they don't believe the incident was an act of terror.
In a video posted on Instagram from onboard the train moments after the crash, passengers could be heard crying and crawling through the sideways car.
Janelle Richards, a producer for NBC Nightly News, was another passenger on the train. According to Richards, the train was supposed to arrive in New York at 10:30 p.m. Around 9:20 p.m. Richards heard a loud crash and people flew up in the air.
Richards says there was a lot of "jerking back and forth" and "a lot of smoke." Richards also says she saw injured passengers who were bleeding.
Patrick Murphy, a former congressman from Pennsylvania's 8th District and Iraq War veteran was onboard as well. Murphy says he was in the cafe car when the train "crashed."
"It wobbled at first and then went off the tracks," Murphy said. "There were some pretty banged-up people. One guy next to me was passed out. We kicked out the window in the top of the train car and helped get everyone out."
Murphy says a few of the victims were injured to the point where they couldn't move and one person needed a stretcher. He also says paramedics arrived within eight to nine minutes.
U.S. Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.) was also on the train though he disembarked at the Wilmington, Delaware station about 40 miles south from where the train derailed.
"I am grateful to be home safe and sound in Wilmington, and my heart goes out to all those on the train tonight," Carper said. "I hope all of those that are injured recover quickly, and I will keep them in my thoughts and prayers."
Frankford and Castor street is the location of the emergency response staging area.
The incident required a 4-alarm response, including 120 firefighters and 200 police officers.
Rescuers are at the scene going into train cars and conducting searches for more victims. Ambulance drivers are also alerting area hospitals of passengers with injuries that include lacerations and fractures to the lower and upper extremities.
Northeast Corridor service between New York and Philadelphia is suspended. SEPTA regional rail service is also suspended until further notice on the Chestnut Hill West and Trenton Regional Rail lines due to the accident.
Amtrak also set up a hotline for friends and family of passengers on the train. That number is 1-800-523-9101.
This story is developing. Stay with NBC10.com for updates.

Embedded image permalink






Read more: http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Amtrak-Derailment-Philadelphia--303536331.html#ixzz3ZzLG1EWt
Follow us: @nbcphiladelphia on Twitter | nbcphiladelphia on Facebook

Monday, May 11, 2015

The Absent Black Father Myth—Debunked by CDC

The absent black father myth—debunked by CDC

DAILY KOS


Originally posted  on SUN MAY 10, 2015 AT 11:15 AM PDT
We've been told, quite frequently and repeatedly that the problems in the black community that we've seen in Ferguson and Baltimore recently are not the fault of biased, paramilitary, paranoid and violent policing (even if the Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that black people are three times more likely to be subject to law enforcement uses of force). They are not the fault of racist red-lining that created these impoverished neighborhoods in the first place. They are not the fault of bigoted lending and hiring practices that create roadblocks for those attempting to escape those neighborhoods. And the fact that black students are disciplined, suspended and expelled far more easily and quickly for the same or lesser offenses, isn't the problem.
None of that is the problem. Nope.  All of that is just too bad. Life is tough all over. Lots of people have got lots of problems. No, instead we've heard that the welfare benefits in Baltimore are "too lucrative," because when you give people nothing they somehow get more, somewhere. That businesses won't invest in these neighborhoods until something is done about those darn teachers unions. That it's because of "too many gay marriages." That ISIS is using Baltimore to recruit blacks. And, of course, when all else fails, blame Obama.
But what we've heard the most, is that the real problem is the Breakdown in the Black Family™. That too many black fathers have abandoned their children, allowing them to be raised by the streets like feral cats. They don't learn morals, and they don't learn values—so naturally police have to shoot them down like rabid, foaming dogs.  Even when they're unarmed. Even when they have their backs turned and are simply running away. It's all justtheir own fault really.
If only black fathers would spend as much time and energy on their kids as white fathers do. If only...
Well, someone—the Centers for Disease Control—actually went to trouble of checking just how involved in their lives all fathers are, whether or not they are married to the mother of their children or live with them. What they found was that, in reality, black fathers are actuallymore attentive to their children than other fathers generally are.
Imagine that?
Details over the flip.
Some of the relevant highlights from the CDC study as posted atThink Progress.
Considering the fact that “black fatherhood” is a phrase that is almost always accompanied by the word “crisis” in U.S. society, it’s understandable that the CDC’s results seem innovative. But in reality, the new data builds upon years of research that’s concluded that hands-on parenting is similar among dads of all races. There’s plenty of scientific evidence to bust this racially-biased myth. [...]
Although black fathers are more likely to live separately from their children—the statistic that’s usually trotted out to prove the parenting “crisis”—many of them remain just as involved in their kids’ lives. Pew estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and just 32 percent of Hispanic dads.
And there’s compelling evidence that number of black dads living apart from their kids stems from structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded assumption that African-American men somehow place less value on parenting. Equal numbers of black dads and white dads tend to agree that it’s important to be a father who provides emotional support, discipline, and moral guidance. There’s one area of divergence in the way the two groups approach their parental responsibilities: Black dads are even more likely to think it’s important to financially provide for their children.
So, of course, parents should be involved in the lives of their children. Of course they should help guide them, give them a sense of morality, goals and direction. But that doesn't require that the father necessarily be married to the mother. People like Donald Trump have certainly made that obvious. The nuclear family myth has long ago been blown into small dust-like bits. Many of us live in extended and blended house-holds within which we've all learned to adapt, and function and even thrive.
Perhaps it's time we stopped flogging the simplistic notion that all that truly plagues the black community is a lack of weddings.
12:03 PM PT: To be fair and complete, as pointed out in the comments, there is a significant difference in the rate of single-parent families across racial lines as this chart from theKidCount Datacenter shows here:
However this is actually the rate of marriages across racial groups and not a direction correlation to the percentage of those who are living with, or living apart from their children as noted in the CDC report.
Definitions: Children under age 18 who live with their own single parent either in a family or subfamily.

In this definition, single-parent families may include cohabiting couples and do not include children living with married stepparents. Children who live in group quarters (for example, institutions, dormitories, or group homes) are not included in this calculation.
This really a difference in the rate of marriages, so it is isn't really a perfect correlation for those living with, or apart, from their children.
Here's a couple snap shots from the Census Bureau on Children Living with a single or both parents regardless of marriage.
These do show a difference in the percentage of children living with one parent (the mother only) vs two parents between White (18%), Latino or Hispanic (24%) and Black (50%) households. But what's interesting is the percentage who live with their father only (White - 3.8%, Hispanic - 3.0%, Black - 4.3%) is also higher.
Does this invalidate the CDC analysis?  Well, no.  There is a lower marriage rate among black people and that does seem to have an effect on how many of them are living with vs living apart from their children.  But the level of involvement, of parenting, across racial lines from men in either of those two living  situations - is not that significantly different.  In fact, more Black fathers who live apart from their children are in most measurements are actually far more involved in their children's lives [in some cases by nearly a 2:1 or 3:1 ratio] which may be a direct result, and/or offset, to the fact that far more of them are in that situation percentage-wise.
5:11 PM PT: Couple more thoughts:
One of the problems with the assumption that a Nuclear Family is the "best" family for raising children is the reality that not all biological parents provide the best guidance, example, or have the best of relationship with each other. Things can turn abusive, violent and sometimes deadly.  Quite often the weapons used in this disputes, is a gun.
Firearms were used to kill more than two-thirds of spouse and ex-spouse homicide victims between 1990 and 2005.2

Domestic violence assaults involving a firearm are 12 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.3

Abused women are five times more likely to be killed by their abuser if the abuser owns a firearm.4
A recent survey of female domestic violence shelter residents in California found that more than one third (36.7%) reported having been threatened or harmed with a firearm.5 In nearly two thirds (64.5%) of the households that contained a firearm, the intimate partner had used the firearm against the victim, usually threatening to shoot or kill the victim.6
So that's one reason why some moms and dads shouldn't live together.  
Another factor on the "Nuclear Family" ideas is the fact that many of these studies don't take into account the impact of the extended family, grand-parents, uncles, aunts, older siblings and cousins can have on the child-rearing processes.  Parenting sometimes takes more than just the actual parents themselves, particular when both of them need to work to make end-meet, and there are other day-care and babysitting issues that need to be addressed. Two out of our last three serving Presidents were raised in single-parent homes with the support of extended family, so clearly - it's not hopeless.
Lastly it strikes me that there can be inherent problems at looking at an internal proportional number, when the external proportion may be at an far larger differential.  To wit: there are almost five times as many White people in America as they are Black.  So if you were to take the single-parent percentages for each and multiply them against the numbers of actual children involved what you would see is this:
Hispanic Children in Single-Parent Households: 28.6% x 16.3 Million = 4.66 Million
Black Children in Single-Parent Households: 54.7% x 11.2 Million = 6.12 Million.
[Corrected] White Children in Single-Parent Households: 22.1% x 55.9 Million = 12.3 Million.
So even with an almost twice as high internal percentage of single-parent households, the external percentage is that there are still only one third one half as many black children living in that situation as there are white, and when you add this greater quantity of white "at risk" youth to the CDC data it seems that the quality of some of that white parenting may not be quite a strong.
But we don't really hear much about the single-parenting crisis of absent White Fathers, now do we? And we don't see our jails filled to the brim with the failed results of these millions of white single-parent households even with a 3:1 gap in actual numbers, instead we see it filled far more frequently, with black men who afterward can't really be good, attentive Fathers anymore, now can they?  Perhaps that is the source for the internal percentage differential in the first place.

ORIGINALLY POSTED TO DAILY KOS ON SUN MAY 10, 2015 AT 11:15 AM PDT.

ALSO REPUBLISHED BY BLACK KOS COMMUNITY.