Sunday, November 14, 2021

The Genetics Behind The Different Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines

 




The Genetics Behind The Different Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines


By Janie Shelton, Ph.D., and Daniella Coker, MPH*


As part of 23andMe’s ongoing study into COVID-19, our scientists have recently looked at how people react differently to different vaccines, noting that those who previously had COVID-19, as well as women and younger people reacted the strongest to the vaccine.

Following up on that data, we also wanted to better understand whether genetics could help explain those differences and whether that could help us better understand the virus. We found that some variants in a complex of genes involved in immune response are associated with being more likely to have a strong reaction to the vaccine and some make it less likely. 


 Participating in COVID-19 Research

Before we go into details it’s important to note that this kind of study is possible because millions of individuals have already been vaccinated. Among them are a large number of 23andMe customers who have consented to participate in research. That has allowed our scientists to quickly explore how genetics plays a role in both the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19. We’ve also looked at other aspects of the pandemic like its impact on sleep, physical activity, and how it has hit some communities harder than others. In this latest study, we looked at the factors associated with “reactogenicity”, or how noticeable a person’s response was to the vaccine. Some reported feeling nothing at all while others reported feeling very ill. This gave our scientists the data needed to study whether genetics could explain those differences.

To do that we conducted a genome-wide association study looking at these different responses to the vaccine between those who described feeling “Not at all sick” to those who felt “Extremely sick.” 

Genetic Associations

We found a strong association between variations in the HLA genes — the human leukocyte antigen complex which is involved in regulating immune response. These genes encode for a number of proteins that make up the major-histocompatibility complex, which is on the frontline of your immune system’s infection recognition system. These results show that variations in the HLA complex are related to the degree to which one feels ill after vaccination. 


First, it’s helpful to understand a bit about how vaccines work. These vaccines teach your immune system to recognize and respond to the virus that causes COVID-19. The mRNA vaccines (e.g. Pfizer/BioNTech & Moderna) introduce genetic instructions to make a harmless protein that is unique to the virus. The other most common vaccine in circulation is the Johnson & Johnson/Jansen vaccine, which uses a viral vector encoding the spike protein. In all three of these vaccines, your immune system develops a response to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, so your immune system can recognize the virus faster if you become exposed and eliminate it before you become severely ill. 

Immune Response

Given how the vaccines work, why would we expect the HLA to be involved? The primary function of HLA molecules is to present foreign antigens on the cell surface in order to elicit an immune response. As such, the HLA plays a key role in presenting the proteins derived from the vaccine to the immune system.

But why do some people feel very sick from their COVID-19 vaccine, and others don’t feel sick at all? 

 Our findings suggest that prior history of COVID-19, younger age, female sex, and the type of HLA alleles you carry are strong predictors. Note that in the below table effect sizes below 1.0 decrease the likelihood of a reaction to the vaccine and the ones above 1.0 increase the likelihood (all reported effect sizes are statistically significant after correction for multiple tests).



Long-haulers

Other studies have also found variation among populations for other alleles within the HLA that are associated with the severity of COVID-19. So for example, a recent study by researchers at the Translational and Clinical Research Institute within Newcastle University found that an allele protective against severe COVID-19 symptoms in the HLA gene, at HLA-DRB1*04:01, was found at much higher frequency in people of Northwestern European ancestry. 


23andMe’s data on genetic associations related to different reactions to the vaccine offers other clues about the complexity of COVID-19. It is part of our on-going work to better understand the virus and the best approaches to fight it. Along with the workaround how genetic differences in immune response and blood type may play a role, our researchers are studying the long-term effects of the virus. We hope to look at so-called COVID-19 long-haulers to determine whether genetics can also explain why some individuals suffer health effects from the virus for weeks, months, and longer. 


For more, you can go to our COVID-19 Information Center here.   


*The 23andMe COVID-19 research team includes: Adam Auton, Adrian Chubb, Alison Fitch, Alison Kung, Amanda Altman, Andy Kill, Anjali Shastri, Antony Symons, Catherine Weldon, Chelsea Ye, Jason Tan, Jeff Pollard, Jey McCreight, Jess Bielenberg, John Matthews, Johnny Lee, Lindsey Tran, Maya Lowe, Michelle Agee, Monica Royce, Nate Tang, Pooja Gandhi, Raffaello d’Amore, Ruth Tennen, Scott Dvorak, Scott Hadly, Stella Aslibekyan, Sungmin Park, Taylor Morrow, Teresa Filshtein Sonmez, Trung Le, and Yiwen Zheng.  


The post The Genetics Behind The Different Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines appeared first on 23andMe Blog.

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

COVID-19 en la República de Cuba: Behind Cuba's successful pandemic response

 


Cuba's long-standing commitment to health has led to a successful COVID-19 pandemic response, but it is threatened by financial and supplier issues. Talha Burki reports.

As The Lancet Infectious Diseases went to press, Cuba was due to launch a phase 3 trial of its subunit conjugate vaccine against COVID-19. Soberana-2 is one of four candidate COVID-19 vaccines in development in Cuba. It is produced by the Finlay Institute in Havana. On the basis of as-yet-unpublished results from early-stage clinical trials, Vicente Verez-Bencomo, director-general of the Finlay Institute, expects the vaccine to show an efficacy in the region of 80–95%. “We are very optimistic”, he said. If everything goes according to plan, Cuba could start a mass vaccination programme for its 11·2 million citizens sometime in the summer.

View related content for this article

After keeping SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) at bay for most of 2020, Cuba has experienced a surge of infections in 2021. As of March 8, the country had reported 55 693 cases of COVID-19 and 348 deaths. 23 093 new cases occurred in February alone, almost twice as many as occurred in the whole of 2020. Cuba is still doing far better than the majority of other countries in the region, but a vaccine is urgently needed.

A second phase 3 trial of Soberana-2 is planned for Iran, as part of a partnership between the Finlay Institute and the Pasteur Institute of Iran. A phase 2/3 trial has been scheduled for Soberana-1, which was also developed by the Finlay Institute. The Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (Havana, Cuba) is behind the other vaccine candidates. Abdala and Mambisa, a nasal spray, both entered phase 1/2 trials late last year.

Soberana means sovereign in Spanish. Abdala is the title of a poem by a Cuban revolutionary, and Mambisa is named after the guerrillas who fought against the Spanish colonialists in the 19th century. All of which indicates that the vaccine drive is a matter of national pride. President Miguel Díaz-Canel has visited the Finlay Institute three times over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. At home and abroad, post-revolutionary Cuban identity has always been bound up with health. In 1960, Cuba joined the relief effort after the Chilean earthquake. In 1963, it sent health-care workers to assist the newly independent state of Algeria.

Cuba's Henry Reeve Brigade was established in 2005. It has despatched cadres of health-care professionals all over the world to combat disasters and epidemics. Cuban doctors were on the scene in Haiti during the cholera outbreak that followed the 2010 earthquake; they arrived in west Africa during the 2013–16 Ebola crisis. And when COVID-19 spread to Europe, two Henry Reeve teams landed in Italy. By the end of April, 2020, more than 1000 Cuban health-care workers were helping foreign countries respond to COVID-19.

“The international health programme is about solidarity; Cuba believes that healthy populations are the bedrock of global society and they want to support that any way they can”, said Clare Wenham, assistant professor of global health policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (London, UK). Malaria, polio, tetanus, and measles have been eradicated in Cuba. The island's successful response to COVID-19 was largely a result of years of investment in primary care and assiduous attention to population health. The country has comprehensive universal health care and one of the highest doctor to patient ratios in the world.

Doctor and nurse teams are embedded in the local community. “Everyone has a yearly routine check-up, and if you do not go, the doctor will come and find you”, Wenham told The Lancet Infectious Diseases. “It means physicians proactively identify problems; there is a real emphasis on prevention.” Disease outbreaks can be detected more or less immediately. Under a model known as CARE, patients are stratified into four categories: apparently healthy, at risk of disease, unwell, and in rehabilitation or recovery. Those at risk of disease include individuals who are overweight, have diabetes, or hypertension. When Cuba registered its first case of COVID-19 on March 11, 2020, it already knew the whereabouts of its most vulnerable citizens.

In an interview with MEDICC Review, family physician Marta Gálvez outlined the advantages of the Cuban system: “The first thing any self-respecting doctor must know is the health situation of the population she serves”, she explained. “The main goal of a primary care physician is health promotion and prevention of diseases, so you have to know your community to design a strategy that suits their needs. CARE is a vital tool: it's why I know that I have 658 older adults in a total population of 1093 people, and 42 of the elderly live alone.” Roughly one in five Cubans are over the age of 60 years.

“The public health network is very strong in Cuba, but it comes at the cost of civil liberties”, said Wenham. “Cuba is a very specific context; not many countries are going to accept that kind of close medical surveillance, and most governments do not have such tight control over their citizens.” After SARS-CoV-2 entered the island, more than 28 000 medical students led an active screening programme that within a few weeks had reached 9 million Cubans. Cuba had started preparing well in advance of its first case of COVID-19. It quickly shut its borders and set up isolation centres and an efficient system of test-and-trace. But soon after Cuba opened up late last year, cases began to rise.

The pandemic has been extremely expensive. Gross domestic product shrunk by 11% in 2020. Instead of the usual 4 million tourists, Cuba played host to just 80 000. The long-standing economic blockade imposed by the USA has taken a heavy toll. “Health centres and clinics face regular stock outs of basic drugs, such as paracetamol, and other equipment such as bandages”, notes Fiona Samuels, senior research fellow and honorary associate professor at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (London, UK). “The staff are very well trained, but the health infrastructure is decayed and they often lack the basics to allow them to do their work effectively.”

Cuba's biotechnology industry sprang up in response to the US blockade. It consists of more than 30 research institutions and manufacturers, under the aegis of the state-run conglomerate BioCubaFarma. In the late 1980s, Cuba developed the world's first meningococcal B vaccine. It produces eight of the ten routinely used vaccines in the country, and sends hundreds of millions of doses abroad. But obtaining raw materials is a constant struggle, especially in the aftermath of the hardening of the American sanctions during Donald Trump's presidency. “You have situations where suppliers of important components for our industry for several decades have been obliged to suddenly stop; it makes everything more expensive and complicated, and it is real concern”, said Verez-Bencomo. Tourism brings in a flow of much-needed currency, especially since Cuban-Americans have been barred from sending remittances, but with the tourists comes the virus. The Cuban Government reckons that more than 70% of current cases of COVID-19 are linked to new arrivals in the country.

If Soberana-2 proves successful, Cuba plans to export it at low cost after the national vaccination efforts have finished. The centralised health-care system means the domestic rollout is unlikely to be problematic, although pockets of the island are tricky to access. Verez-Bencomo reckons that by the end of the summer the country will have the capacity to produce 10 million doses of vaccine per month. Cubans are excited about the endeavour. “When we call for volunteers for clinical trials, we always have two or three times as many people as we need coming forward”, said Verez-Bencomo. “On the street, everywhere I go, everyone is asking about the vaccine.”

by Talha Burki

COVID-19 pandemic in Cuba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The COVID-19 pandemic in Cuba is part of the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus was confirmed to have spread to Cuba on 11 March 2020 when three Italian tourists tested positive for the virus. 

On 12 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed that a novel coronavirus was the cause of a respiratory illness in a cluster of people in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, which was reported to the WHO on 31 December 2019.[5][6]

The case fatality ratio for COVID-19 has been much lower than SARS of 2003,[7][8] but the transmission has been significantly greater, with a significant total death toll.[9][7]

Cuba faces multiple domestic challenges in its response to the ongoing pandemic. Health professionals are facing challenges including shortages of medical supplies, poor sanitary conditions, and low wages. Cuba also has one of the oldest populations in the Americas and one quarter of the population is considered at-risk. Additionally, Cuba's economy is suffering due to the global decrease in tourism amid the pandemic. As a consequence, the government began increasing centralization of the economy in an effort to prevent a deeper economic crisis like the one experienced by the country after the end of the Cold War.[10]

Cuba's policy of “medical internationalism” has played a prominent role in the country's response to the COVID-19 crisis. Cuba sent medical personnel to the hardest-hit Italian wealthy region of Lombardy,[11] as well as Angola and a dozen Caribbean states including Suriname.

Cuba has engaged effective COVID-19 preventive measures, and despite the concurrent economic crisis and shortages of consumer products, officials have reporter that the country's population has only suffered minimal losses. Regular testing, wearing of face masks, and health visits by nursing professionals have kept the reported case loads and mortality rates lower than in most countries of the Americas.

Timeline

March 2020

On 11 March, the first three cases in Cuba were confirmed. The patients were Italian tourists. They were kept in isolation at the Pedro Kouri Tropical Medicine Institute in Havana.[13]

The government urged citizens to make their own face masks, while the textile industry was drafted to fabricate them. People were advised to carry several cloth face masks with them, depending on how many hours they plan to spend in public areas.[4]

On 12 March, a fourth confirmed case was announced. This was a Cuban, whose wife had arrived from Milan, Italy on 24 February, and who had started showing symptoms on 27 February. The husband had begun to show symptoms by 8 March. Both were tested and he was positive. The wife was stated to be negative because the disease had run its course.[14]

On 16 March, the cruise ship MS Braemar, with over 1,000 passengers and crew on board, was given permission to berth in Cuba after being rejected by the Bahamas. At least five passengers have tested positive for coronavirus (COVID-19). British citizens were able to take flights home after both governments reached an agreement on their repatriation.[15]

On 17 March, the number of confirmed cases increased to 7.[16]

On 18 March, the number of confirmed cases increased to 10, and the first death was announced, a 61-year old Italian who had been one of the first three confirmed.[17]

On 19 March, the number of confirmed cases increased to 16.[18]

On 20 March, the number of confirmed cases increased to 21.[19] Also, it was announced that Cuba will restrict entry to residents with effect from 24 March.[20] Only Cuban residents may enter, that is, if they have not been outside of Cuba for more than 24 months; as well as foreigners residing on the island.[21]

On 22 March, the Ministry of Public Health (MINSAP) of Cuba raised the number of coronavirus infections on the island to 35 but were monitoring more than 950 suspected cases, according to information published by the state agency on its website.[22]

On 23 March, authorities in Cuba raised the number of coronavirus patients to 48.[23]

On 24 March, the Cuban government closed all schools until at least 20 April.[24]

Visitors who arrived between 17 and 23 March were required to be tested for the coronavirus.[25]

As of 30 March, the number of confirmed coronavirus cases was at 170, with 4 deaths.[26]

April 2020

With effect from midnight on 1 April, Cuba suspended the arrival of all international flights.[27]

On 4 April, authorities in Cuba raised the number of coronavirus patients to 288.[28]

As of 15 April, there were 755 cases of COVID-19 in Cuba, there were 18,856 total tests done so far[29]

May 2020

As of 12 May, new cases had fallen to less than 20 per day, and a program of mass testing was beginning.[30]

As of 30 May, the city of Havana represented slightly more than half of the total confirmed cases.



https://www.thelancet.com/coronavirus

Sunday, February 21, 2021

White immigrants weren’t always considered white — and acceptable

 

Newly arrived immigrants disembark from the passenger steamer Thomas C. Millard upon their arrival at Ellis Island in New York in the early 20th century.

White immigrants weren’t always considered white — and acceptable

Italians, Greeks, Poles, Hungarians, Slavs and other European groups had to overcome prejudice over many years

Who, exactly, is white?

  The answer sounds obvious — we know a white person when we see one, we think. But when Italians poured into America in the late 1800s and early 1900s, they were not considered white upon arrival. A century later, though, when Teresa Giudice of The Real Housewives of New Jersey maniacally hoisted a table on national television, she did not do so as a member of a supposedly inferior people. No, she was a crazy white lady throwing furniture.

 The story of how European immigrants during that era became white enlightens us on our current political realities. Italians, Greeks, Poles, Hungarians, Slavs and other European groups, at the time called “new immigrants,” sought to overcome their subordination by showing, through their behavior, to be deserving of being considered white.

 In 1911, Henry Pratt Fairchild, an influential American sociologist, said about new immigrants, “If he proves himself a man, and … acquires wealth and cleans himself up — very well, we might receive him in a generation or two. But at present he is far beneath us, and the burden of proof rests with him.” They ultimately met that burden and crucial to their success was that they were not black and they actively helped in maintaining a racist society.

 I understood this to be true after finishing historian David R. Roediger’s Working Toward Whiteness, a book about how new immigrants became white. Between 1886 and 1925, 13 million new immigrants came from southern, eastern and central Europe. Up until that point, people considered white generally hailed from England, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany and Scandinavian countries. Roediger, a professor at University of Illinois, argues that new immigrants, until they were fully brought into the white family, lived in a state of in-betweeness, meaning they were placed in a racial pecking order below whites but above people of color.

 The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — foreigners would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this country, lowering an elevated civilization. Many held that they were not white, rather members of a lower biological order. The kinder view held they were simply culturally inferior — dirty, less intelligent, criminal-prone — but could assimilate.

 Not being considered white led to new immigrant misery. Economist Robert F. Forester wrote in 1924, “in a country where the distinction between white man and black is intended as a distinction of value … it is no compliment to the Italian to deny him his whiteness, but that actually happens with considerable frequency.”

 Greeks, for example, fretted about being mistaken for Puerto Ricans, mulattoes or Mexicans. J.D. Ross, an Alabama politician, dubbed himself the “white man’s candidate” and campaigned on Greek disenfranchisement. In Utah, Greek and Italian copper miners were classified as “nonwhite.” White workers in Steelton, Pennsylvania, refused to take “hunky jobs” — jobs traditionally held by Hungarians — even during the poor economy of 1908, preferring unemployment.

 New immigrants had a choice — fight for inclusion into the white race or align with people of color, who they knew fared even worse than them. One Serbian worker said during the era, “You soon know something about this country. … Negroes never get a fair chance.”

 They chose whiteness and sought to demonstrate their cultural and biological fitness. They soon learned, though, when whites said “prove yourself,” helping protect and expand white supremacy was considered convincing evidence.

 They watched whites abuse blacks, mimicked whatever they saw and whiteness — the carrot they had long reached for — slowly came closer to their grasp.

 Essayist James Baldwin frequently mused on how whiteness was made. How did whites become white? “By informing their children,” Baldwin wrote, “that black women, black men and black children had no human integrity that those who call themselves white were bound to respect. And in this debasement and definition of black people, they debased and defined themselves.” As one Slovakian woman in Connecticut said, “I always tell my children not to play with the nigger people’s children, but they always play with them just the same … This place now is all spoiled, and all the people live like pigs because the niggers they come and live here with the decent white people and they want to raise up their children with our children.”

 New immigrants’ participation in the widespread use of racially restrictive covenants, an integral tool in achieving residential segregation, was most crucial in their proving themselves. This covenant is an agreement homeowners signed, pledging not to sell their property to persons of a certain race, generally blacks. If a white person violated it, white neighbors could sue to stop the sale.

 New immigrants hungered for home ownership, even penny-pinching just to own property. Thus, when New Deal-era politics put home ownership at the center of the American dream by making more families homeowners, whites needed new immigrants’ assistance in making Negro-free neighborhoods.

 In the early 20th century, new immigrants in many cities were more segregated than were blacks. By the 1950s, the opposite was true. With these new immigrants living in the same neighborhoods, intermarrying, attending the same schools, mingling, and, most importantly, committing racism against black folk, through successive generations, they became white.

 As this tale demonstrates, whites have agreed to privilege themselves over nonwhites. Moral revulsion has compelled many whites to opt out of this agreement. Yet, some white Americans pin their hopes on whiteness, as did the new immigrants, and, therefore, the siren song of a politician promising to enhance the social and economic value of white skin seduces them.

 The story of how new immigrants became white teaches us whites can look at people they once deemed their inferiors and consider them part of their team.

 President Barack Obama remarked that racial advancement doesn’t proceed in a straight forward-moving line. Instead, moments of progress give way to regressions. He’s right. And whether white supremacy surges or wanes modulates this phenomenon.

 I believe we will witness a moment of racial triumph in the future, and elation will overwhelm those longing for a racially fair-minded America. The next “whitelash,” however, can only be prevented if whites conclude that joining with nonwhite peoples of similar socioeconomic standing will bring them closer to happiness than seeking to protect white privilege.

 The work to overcome white supremacy will exhaust the nation. Given the stakes, however, the work is worth pursuing.

An Italian immigrant family on board a ferry from the docks to Ellis Island, New York. Lewis W Hine/Getty Images

Ship loaded with immigrants, coming to New York. A Greek family embarking on Ellis Island to come to America.



Sunday, February 14, 2021

Sen. Mitch McConnell rips Trump as ‘disgraceful’ but defends his impeachment acquittal vote

 



I thought you might like this story from NY Daily News.

"Sen. Mitch McConnell rips Trump as ‘disgraceful’ but defends his impeachment acquittal vote
DAVE GOLDINER
February 13 at 5:56 PM ET
Sen. Mitch McConnell has never sounded so much like a Democrat — until he found a way to wriggle out of convicting ex-President Trump at his impeachment trial.
In a remarkable speech on the Senate floor, the powerful GOP minority leader excoriated Trump for “provoking” the violent attack on the Capitol last month.
“There is no question that Trump is morally and practically responsible for what happened on January 6,″ McConnell said, calling Trump’s actions and inaction a “disgraceful dereliction of duty.”
McConnell derided Trump for failing to act to quell the siege even as armed rioters unleashed chaos in his name inside the citadel of American democracy.

“He watched happily on television as the chaos unfolded,” McConnell said.
The Kentucky senator offered a highly technical argument for his acquittal vote, claiming that it was unconstitutional to impeach an former president and that Trump’s speech may not have met the technical legal definition of incitement.
Given the relatively wide 57-43 margin in favor of conviction, McConnell’s decision to vote for acquittal very likely prevented Trump from being convicted.
McConnell holds significant sway over a large bloc of establishment conservative senators and his announcement early Saturday that he would vote to acquit effectively sealed the deal for many of his GOP colleagues.

McConnell even had the chutzpah to put the burden on others to hold Trump accountable.
The Republican leader said it was up to prosecutors to press civil or perhaps even criminal cases against Trump.
“He hasn’t been cleared of any of his actions as president, yet,” McConnell said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi trashed McConnell for what she called a hypocritical decision to denounce Trump without voting to convict him.
“For Mitch McConnell to say all the things about Donald Trump and how horrible he is...and to vote to acquit him,” Pelosi said, “it was just an excuse he used.”


© 2021 New York Daily News"


Sunday, January 17, 2021

Red Summer, when white mobs massacred Blacks from Tulsa to D.C.

 


The Troglodytes have always been barbaric, savagely cruel, primitive, unsophisticated & exceedingly brutal. Notice how they attacked & breached the United States Capitol on Jan 6. This is the same way they have been attacking Black communities since the 1870s.  Race rioting began with southern whites, resenting black advancement & prosperity, attacked them to disenfranchise them of both the vote and economic prosperity. The Meridian, Mississippi race riot of 1871, the Colfax Massacre in Louisiana in April 1873, the New Orleans riot of July 1866, the Memphis, Tennessee riot of May 1866, the Charleston, South Carolina riot of September 1876 and the Wilmington, South Carolina race riot of 1898, East St. Louis Massacre of 1917, The East St. Louis Massacre launched a reign of racial terror throughout the U.S. that historians say stretched from 1917 to 1923, when the all-Black town of Rosewood, Florida, was destroyed. During that period, known as the Red Summer, at least 97 lynchings were recorded, thousands of Black people were killed, and thousands of Black-owned homes and businesses were burned to the ground. Fire and fury fueled massacres in at least 26 cities, including Washington, D.C.; Chicago, Illinois; Omaha, Nebraska; Elaine, Arkansas; Charleston, South Carolina; Columbia, Tennessee; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma. 

The Rosewood Massacre began New Year's Day 1923


Your View: A history of white race riots in America

By ARTHUR H. GARRISON

THE MORNING CALL |

JUN 12, 2020 AT 7:00 AM


When a video was made public of four Minneapolis police officers on top of the face-down body of George Floyd, showing one officer with his knee on Floyd’s neck, choking him in the light of day, thousands of people in dozens of cities revolted for more than seven days.

 The expression on the officer’s face displayed the problem of indifference to black life that dates back to the policies adopted by America as it rose from the ashes of the Civil War.

 For 45 years after 1865, America entered the Second Industrial Revolution, which brought the rise of corporate industry and the robber barons who would lead the way to the American Century. But while America built itself economically and internationally, it adopted and entered the golden age of Jim Crow.

 One aspect of that golden age was the use of violence to destroy the advances blacks made during the Reconstruction era. The paradox of American exceptionalism and greatness is that it melded the idea of individual freedom and government for the people, and not the other way around; with a multigenerational social policy that blacks by law (in the day) and by the Klan (at night) were prevented from growing with America.

Adult thinking acknowledges two things are true at the same time: America is a great nation based on great and noble principles, and it became great with the intentional adoption of the structural policy of racism.

This history of Jim Crow enforced by the Klan provides context for a hard truth: In America, race riots are used to settle social discontent. The origin of race rioting begins with southern whites, resenting black advancement, attacked them to disenfranchise them of both the vote and economic prosperity.

 Race riots were not born in the 1960s; they were born in the 1870s. The Meridian, Mississippi race riot of 1871, the Colfax Massacre in Louisiana in April 1873, the New Orleans riot of July 1866, the Memphis, Tennessee riot of May 1866, the Charleston, South Carolina riot of September 1876 and the Wilmington, South Carolina race riot of 1898, to name a few, occurred under the passive and sometimes direct hand of the local police.

 The result: The ability of the former slaves to create intergenerational wealth — the key to all success in a capitalist nation — was systematically destroyed for generations.

From the late 1890s through the 1920s, white race riots continued. In the 1921 Greenwood Riot, the entire black neighborhood of Greenwood in Tulsa, Oklahoma, which was known as the black Wall Street, was burned to the ground. And in the Rosewood massacre of 1923, the entire neighborhood of Rosewood, Levy County, Florida was similarly destroyed.

 These and other white race riots (Red Summer of 1919) not only took black lives and wiped whole black neighborhoods off the face of the earth, they ended black economic wealth that could be passed to subsequent generations. It also caused displacement of black expertise and talent, thwarting its concentration and increase.

 This economic decimation of black wealth and social stability was made worse by the Great Depression and blacks being denied full access to the various New Deal programs of the 1930s and the benefits of the GI Bill in the 1940s. Thus, during the first four decades of the American Century, blacks were subjected to white race riots and social policies that destroyed their wealth.

The point is that while whites were allowed to create intergenerational wealth and form wealthy communities both before and after the world wars, blacks were, as a matter of policy, prevented from doing the same. The policy outcome of a century of Jim Crow is systemic racism.

 One result of this policy outcome is the design of modern urban America. The modern American urban structure of neighborhoods — how they look and how they are designed — is the result of racial neighborhood exclusions (early 1900s), legal restrictive covenants (1920–1948), followed by racially restrictive covenants, in fact (1948–1968), and the FHA policies of red lining of black neighborhoods through the FHA (1934–1968), in conjunction with the practices of blockbusting, real estate value manipulation, and racial steering by the insurance and real estate industry.

 These Jim Crow policies concentrated blacks into urban neighborhoods during the Second Great Migration.

 This concentration and isolation was institutionalized through the policy choices of investment in public highways over public transportation; the isolation of neighborhoods by limiting the public transportation connection between these communities and the suburbs where middle-class jobs were being placed; the use of highways and street design to break connections between communities; and the policy of public education funding being tied to property values.

 These policies explain the modern physical design and poverty concentration within various American neighborhoods. The legacy of these policies, along with the crime control policies of the 1980s and 1990s, explain and define the concept of structural systemic racism and the resulting events in Baltimore, Ferguson, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and other metropolitan cities over the past four decades.

 Margaret Thatcher said America is exceptional because it is the result of specific decisions made, not by a long march of thousands of years of history. She, of course, was correct.

 Arthur Garrison is an associate professor of criminal justice at Kutztown University and author of the upcoming book, “Chained to the System: The History and Politics of Black Incarceration in America.”

Remembering ‘Red Summer,’ when white mobs massacred Blacks from Tulsa to D.C.

The U.S. was gripped by a reign of racial terror after World War I, when whites rose up to quash prosperous Black communities.

A Black man lay half-conscious in the street after being beaten by a white mob during the East St. Louis Massacre of 1917. As the man tried to get up, a well-dressed white man standing behind him “lifted a flat stone in both hands and hurled it upon his neck,” a reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch wrote on July 3, 1917.

 For an hour and 30 minutes on the evening of July 1, the reporter witnessed barbaric scenes of white mobs “destroying the life of every discoverable black man.” The gruesome displays of racial violence were among the worst the United States would ever see.

 The Illinois massacre had been sparked by the fear of Black men migrating from the South to factories in the North and taking jobs from white people. Tensions exploded that July 1, and raged for three days and nights, leaving as many as 39 Black people and nine white people dead, according to reports. But historians believe hundreds more Black people were killed during that time. (Read how the death of George Floyd connects to this brutal American legacy.)

Carlos F. Hurd, the reporter for the Post-Dispatch, wrote in the archived article that he was appalled by the casualness with which white mobs roamed East St. Louis and stoned Black men who had their “hands raised, pleading for life.” He witnessed a Black man, “almost dead from a savage shower of stones,” hanged with a clothesline. When that broke, the mob hanged him with a rope.

A group of white women beat a group of Black women with sticks and stones as they begged “for mercy,” Hurd wrote. But the white women “laughed and answered the coarse sallies of men as they beat the negresses’ faces and breasts with fists, stones and sticks.”

 The East St. Louis Massacre launched a reign of racial terror throughout the U.S. that historians say stretched from 1917 to 1923, when the all-Black town of Rosewood, Florida, was destroyed. During that period, known as the Red Summer, at least 97 lynchings were recorded, thousands of Black people were killed, and thousands of Black-owned homes and businesses were burned to the ground. Fire and fury fueled massacres in at least 26 cities, including Washington, D.C.; Chicago, Illinois; Omaha, Nebraska; Elaine, Arkansas; Charleston, South Carolina; Columbia, Tennessee; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma.

 “During the massacres, they murdered and maimed people indiscriminately, unprovoked,” said Alice M. Thomas, a Carnegie scholar and a professor in the School of Law at Howard University. “They went into homes, stole personal belongings, and burned down homes. They used the massacres as a cover to murder without sanction, maim without sanction, and steal without sanction. No one, to this day, has been held accountable.”

 Racial terror was common in many parts of the country following the end of slavery. “It was an intentional use of violence against African Americans,” said David F. Krugler, author of 1919, The Year of Racial Violence. “The motivation was to punish African Americans for economic success and take it away. In Tulsa, they burned it to the ground.”

President Donald Trump is holding his first political rally since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic on June 20 in Tulsa, a city still haunted by the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, which left more than 300 Black people dead and more than 10,000 homeless. White mobs destroyed 35-square-blocks of Greenwood, a Black neighborhood that was so prosperous it was called “Black Wall Street.”

 Trump initially scheduled the rally for Juneteenth, a date revered and celebrated by African Americans. June 19 commemorates the date 250,000 enslaved people were freed in Texas—two-and-a-half years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863. After widespread criticism, the Trump campaign moved the event by a day.

 The decision to hold the rally in Tulsa is a sharp reminder that the country has not made amends for its history of racial massacres. That history is inextricably connected to current demands for justice.

The legacy of the Red Summer

 The term “Red Summer” was coined by James Weldon Johnson, the composer who wrote the “Negro National Anthem” and an executive director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) who fought for federal anti-lynching laws.

 Ibram X. Kendi, author of Stamped From the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America, wrote that the Red Summer describes “all the blood spilled in the deadliest series of white invasions of Black neighborhoods since Reconstruction.”

 To understand current racial unrest, people must understand the Red Summer. “You have whites organized with a specific purpose. They want to keep blacks in subordinate positions so they do not dare assert their equality or autonomy,” said Krugler, a professor of history at University of Wisconsin—Platteville.

 The Red Summer also coincided with the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and the Great Migration, an exodus of Black people fleeing racial terror and brutal Jim Crow laws in the South. They traveled in droves to cities in the North, where they were confronted by northern racial hostilities. Often whites viewed Blacks as competition for jobs, homes, and political power.

 That power was propelled by increased Black resistance to injustice. Some called it the rise of the “New Negro,” no longer subservient to white people. Black soldiers had returned from World War I expecting the human rights they had fought for abroad—rights for which they were willing to die defending at home. Black veterans refused upon their return to accept injustice, inequality, and brutality by a white society.

 “Because of their military service, black veterans were seen as a particular threat to Jim Crow and racial subordination,” according to a report by the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), an Alabama-based non-profit focusing on criminal justice reform and racial inequality.

 “But by the God of heaven,” wrote W.E.B. Du Bois, cofounder of the NAACP and author of The Souls of Black Folk, “we are cowards and jackasses if now that the war is over, we do not marshal every ounce of our brain and brawn to fight a sterner, longer, more unbending battle against the forces of hell in our own land. We return. We return from fighting. We return fighting.”

Washington, DC, 1919

One of the first Black men killed during the Red Summer violence in Washington, D.C., was Randall Neal, a 22-year-old veteran who had just returned home from the war, according to the Equal Justice Initiative.

 Neal’s killing sparked the “D.C. Race Riot of 1919,” which began on July 19. Black veterans organized and retaliated against the attack on Neal and others, as if in battle.

 “In the negro district along U Street from Seventh to Fourteenth streets,” reported the Washington Post, “Negroes began early in the evening to take vengeance for assaults on their race in the downtown district the night before.”

 “Race war galloped wildly through the streets of Washington last night, reaping a death toll of four and a list of wounded running into the hundreds,” the Washington Times reported on July 22. “Bands of whites and blacks hunted each other like clansmen throughout the night, the blood-feud growing steadily. From nightfall to nearly dawn ambulances bore their steady stream of dead and wounded to hospitals.”

 President Woodrow Wilson ordered federal troops into the city to quell the violence.

 “I remember talking to an elder,” said C.R. Gibbs, an author and historian of the African diaspora. “He spoke with pride about guns brought in from Baltimore. Black people took up rooftop positions. They were determined to pick off members of the white mobs, [who had] infiltrated Black neighborhoods.”

 The official death toll was 15. The total damage to property is unknown. The riot, Gibbs said, was fueled by “not just blind race hatred, but resentment of social gains the Black community made just after World War I. When we embraced the capitalist aesthetic, folks lynched us. When we showed we were prosperous, people burned down stores on the premise we violated social codes and legal codes.”

Elaine, Arkansas, 1919

 An even deadlier massacre occurred in Elaine, Arkansas.

 Historian Gibbs said that the massacre in Elaine “should be better known today in terms of loss of life. More people know about Rosewood and Tulsa. In my judgment, when all is said and done, the Elaine, Arkansas, massacre may rival those.”

 The Elaine Massacre began September 30, 1919, after Black sharecroppers dared to organize a union to bring an end to the unscrupulous practices of land owners who were cheating them out of money and crop. According to reports, attempts to organize their labor force prompted a ruthless “crusade of death” by a white mob that left as many as 800 Black people dead.

 On Sept. 30, the union members were holding a meeting at a Black church, guarded by men outside, when two white men drove by.

 A shot was fired. A white man was killed. Rumors of a black uprising spread quickly. The city filled with hundreds of white men with guns. The local sheriff led a white posse that burned houses and schools and shot Black people at random.

 “The press dispatches of October 1, 1919, heralded the news that another race riot had taken place the night before in Elaine, Arkansas, and that it was started by Negroes who had killed some white officers in an altercation,” wrote the anti-lynching crusader and famed journalist Ida B. Wells in her book The Arkansas Race Riot.

 “Later on, the country was told that the white people of Phillips County had risen against the Negroes who started this riot and had killed many of them, and that this orgy of bloodshed was not stopped until United States soldiers from Camp Pike had been sent to the scene of the trouble,” Wells wrote.

 White mobs “slaughtered African Americans in and around Elaine,” according to an account in the Arkansas Gazette.

 The newspaper later explained that soldiers in Elaine “committed one murder after another with all the calm deliberation in the world, either too heartless to realize the enormity of their crimes, or too drunk on moonshine to give a continental darn.”

 In Krugler’s research on the massacre, he noted the particularly vicious lynching of an elderly black woman, the wife of a sharecropper.

“After killing the elderly woman they pulled her dress over her body and dragged her body down a road,” Krugler said. “The corpse was desecrated. This was done to send a message to other African Americans.”

 According to reports, 285 Black people were arrested after the massacre in Elaine. A grand jury in Phillips County charged 122 Black people with crimes related to the massacre. “No white attackers were prosecuted, but twelve black union members convicted of riot-related charges were sentenced to death," according to EJI.

 “The 12 men accused of leading the ‘conspiracy’ were tortured,” Krugler said. “They had formaldehyde stuffed up their noses. They used electrical shocks on their genitals. They were brought to court in chains and not allowed to see an attorney. They were quickly convicted and sentenced to death within minutes.”

 The NAACP intervened in the case and brought national attention to the men who would become known as the “Elaine Twelve.” Scipio Jones, an NAACP attorney, argued the case for the sharecroppers, and it ultimately went to the U.S. Supreme Court.

 On Feb. 19, 1923, four years after the massacre, the Supreme Court decided in favor of the “Elaine Twelve,” ruling that the Black men had been denied due process and that the sham trial in which they were convicted had been influenced by a mob that gathered outside the courthouse, according to Brian Mitchell, a professor of history at the University of Arkansas in Little Rock. On Nov. 3, 1923, Arkansas’s governor commuted the death sentences.


Rosewood, Florida, 1923

 Rivaling the prosperity of Eatonville, the Florida town made famous by writer Zora Neale Hurston, Rosewood was a middle-class town of proud Black people who had developed their own community, built their own houses.

 The “Rosewood Massacre” began on January 1, 1923, after a white woman named Fannie Taylor, of Sumner, Florida, said she had been assaulted by a Black man.

“Claiming she had been assaulted by a black man, Taylor allowed others to say that she had been ‘raped.’ It was the one word that no one in the region wanted to hear, least of all the black residents of Sumner and nearby Rosewood,” David R. Colburn wrote in the Florida Historical Quarterly. “What happened to Fannie Taylor on that cold New Year’s morning will remain forever sealed in history, but the events that followed her alleged attack will not.”

 Within an hour of the allegation, news spread. “Bloodhounds tracked the scent of the alleged attacker to Rosewood, three miles from Sumner. Although Fannie Taylor never suggested that her attacker was a resident of Rosewood, the community would be permanently damaged by the events that unfolded during that first week of January 1923.”

 The mob encountered a Black man, who was tortured, shot, and hanged from a tree.

 Sylvester Carrier, a Black man, tried to defend himself and his property from the mob. “Carrier was killed in a shootout,” according to Encyclopaedia Britannica, “but not before killing two whites, and word of that act quickly spread to surrounding communities. Hundreds of whites joined the mob already in Rosewood, and acts of systematic violence against blacks continued until January 8.”

 More than 10,000 white men from across the state of Florida descended on Rosewood. Black men, women, and children hid in the swamps around the town.

 “Before the week was out,” Colburn wrote, “the mob returned to plunder and burn down the town of Rosewood and drive all the black residents from it forever.”

 It is still unknown how many people were killed in Rosewood. In 1994, the Florida state legislature voted to pay $1.5 million in reparations to be divided among at least 11 survivors of the massacre to compensate them for loss of property. The Rosewood Massacre was dramatized in a 1997 film by director John Singleton.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1921

Three-hundred-thirty-five miles from Elaine, the Tulsa Race Massacre erupted in what historians call one of the worst episodes of racial violence committed against Black people in the country’s history.

 The Tulsa Race Massacre began on May 31, 1921, after the arrest of Dick Rowland, a 19-year-old shoe-shiner. Earlier that day, Rowland walked to the Drexel Building, which had the only bathroom available to Black people in downtown Tulsa. He stepped into an elevator on the first floor. When the elevator reached the third floor, Sarah Page, a white elevator operator, screamed. “The most common explanation is that Rowland stepped on Page’s foot as he entered the elevator, causing her to scream,” the Oklahoma Historical Society said in a report.

 A mob of white men gathered outside the Tulsa courthouse, where Rowland was taken after his arrest for assaulting the elevator operator. Black World War I veterans confronted the mob, determined to protect Rowland.

 A struggle ensued and a white man was shot, sparking the murderous rage that would follow. Hundreds of white people marched on the Black neighborhood of Greenwood. Whites killed more than 300 Black people—dumping their bodies into the Arkansas River or burying them in mass graves. More than a hundred businesses were destroyed, as well as a school, a hospital, a library, and dozens of churches. More than 1,200 Black-owned houses burned. The economic losses in the Black community amounted to more than $1 million.

 Walter White, who later became executive secretary of the NAACP, said in a NAACP report: “One story was told to me by an eyewitness of five colored men trapped in a burning house. Four were burned to death. A fifth attempted to flee, was shot to death as he emerged from the burning structure, and his body was thrown back into the flames.”

 There were reports that white men flew airplanes above Greenwood, dropping kerosene bombs. “Tulsa was likely the first city” in the U.S. “to be bombed from the air,” according to a report by the Oklahoma Commission to Study the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921.

 B.C. Franklin, a lawyer in Greenwood and the father of famed historian John Hope Franklin, witnessed the massacre. “The sidewalk was literally covered with burning turpentine balls,” Franklin wrote in a manuscript later donated to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture. “For fully forty-eight hours, the fires raged and burned everything in its path and it left nothing but ashes and burned safes and trunks and the like that were stored in beautiful houses and businesses.”

 “Many black residents fought back, but they were greatly outnumbered and outgunned,” according to Human Rights Watch, which in May of this year released a 66-page report entitled “The Case for Reparations in Tulsa, Oklahoma: A Human Rights Argument.”

 “At best, Tulsa Police took no action to prevent the massacre,” according to the document. “Reports indicate that some police actively participated in the violence and looting.”

 Two weeks after the massacre, the Tulsa City Commission issued a report blaming the destruction on the Black people who lived there, not the white mob that pillaged, plundered, and destroyed Greenwood. “Let the blame for this Negro uprising lie right where it belongs—on those armed Negroes and their followers who started this trouble and who instigated it and any persons who seek to put half the blame on the white people are wrong,” according to the commission.

In 2018, Tulsa’s mayor, G.T. Bynum, announced the city would reopen an investigation to search for mass graves of massacre victims. In April of this year, the city planned to dig for evidence in Oaklawn Cemetery, but the “limited excavation” was postponed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

 The destruction in Tulsa left an economic and emotional toll on generations of survivors and their descendants. No white person was ever arrested in connection with the Tulsa Massacre.

Now each Wednesday, the Rev. Robert Turner, pastor of Vernon AME Church, marches at Tulsa’s City Hall, demanding reparations for massacre survivors and their descendants. Vernon AME, which sits on the main street in Greenwood, was burned by white mobs during the massacre. Black people fleeing the raging white mobs hid in the basement, which was one of the only original structures remaining after the massacre.

 A determined activist, Turner grabs his bullhorn and turns it towards people walking by City Hall.

 “The race massacre was done on May 31st through June the first, 1921, when a white mob descended upon law-abiding citizens in a community known as Greenwood,” he shouts. “And this Greenwood was inhabited by Blacks, a generation out of slavery, who had received no small business loans. Blacks who received no Pell grants to go to college. Blacks who lived in places where it was against the law to learn how to read in the states they were coming from. This generation out of slavery, who received no affirmative action, Blacks who never received a welfare check in their life. Blacks who bought land in Greenwood and built the most prosperous place for African Americans in this country. And you killed them out of envy.”

 Kavin Ross, a photojournalist and historian in Tulsa who has spent years investigating the massacre, said many of the earlier massacres that led to the Tulsa Race Massacre followed similar patterns.

 The massacres, Ross said, were stoked by the film Birth of a Nation, which then-President Woodrow Wilson had aired in the White House. “The white mobs got their ideas from that highly racially charged film depicting a white woman running in fear of a Black man, and a white mob, led by the Klan, destroying a Black community.”

 For nearly a hundred years, the Tulsa massacre was left out of textbooks, even in Oklahoma. Olivia Hooker, one of the last survivors of the Tulsa massacre, said in one of her last interviews that she could still remember watching a white mob burn her house. She was six when the mob broke into her family home. Her mother hid Hooker and her siblings under an oak table.

“They took everything they thought was valuable,” recalled Hooker, who died at 103 years old in 2018. “They smashed everything they couldn’t take. My mother had [opera singer Enrico] Caruso records she loved. They smashed the Caruso records.”

 Hooker watched from under the table as the white men poured oil over her grandmother’s bed. “It took me a long time to get over my nightmares,” she told me. “I was keeping my family awake screaming.”

 Her most searing memory of the massacre was how the mob destroyed her doll, a recent gift. “My grandmother had made some beautiful clothes for my doll,” Hooker said. “It was the first ethnic doll we had ever seen. She washed them and put them on the line. When the marauders came, the first thing they did was set fire to my doll’s clothes.”




Monday, January 11, 2021

Insurrection

 


‘Honor, Trust or Profit’


  If the House impeaches President Trump this week, it will still have almost no effect on how long he remains in office. His term expires nine days from now, and even the most rapid conceivable Senate trial would cover much of that time.

 But the impeachment debate is still highly consequential. The Senate has the power both to remove Trump from office and to prevent him from holding office in the future. That second power will not expire when his term ends, many constitutional scholars say. A Senate trial can happen after Jan. 20.

 And disqualifying Trump from holding office again could alter the future of American politics.

 It’s worth pausing for a moment to reflect on how radical a figure Trump is. He rejects basic foundations of American government that other presidents, from both parties, have accepted for decades.

 He has tried to reverse an election result and remain in power by persuading local officials to commit fraud. He incited a mob that attacked the Capitol — and killed a police officer — while Congress was meeting to certify the result. Afterward, Trump praised the rioters.

 This behavior was consistent with Trump’s entire presidency. He has previously rejected the legitimacy of election results and encouraged his supporters to commit violence. He has tried to undermine Americans’ confidence in the F.B.I., the C.I.A., the military, Justice Department prosecutors, federal judges, the Congressional Budget Office, government scientists, government health officials and more. He has openly used the presidency to enrich his family.

 In the simplest terms, Trump seems to believe a president should be able to do whatever he wants. He does not appear to believe in the system of the government that the Constitution prescribes — a democratic republic.

 Yet there is a significant chance he could win the presidency again, in 2024. He remains popular with many Republican voters, and the Electoral College currently gives a big advantage to Republicans. If he is not disqualified from future office, Trump could dominate the Republican Party and shape American politics for the next four years.

 If he is disqualified, it’s impossible to know what would happen, but this much is clear: A singularly popular figure who rejects the basic tenets of American democracy would no longer be eligible to lead it.

Members of the National Guard outside the Capitol yesterday.Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times


What are the basics of disqualification?


Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”

The Constitution does not specify whether disqualification requires a two-thirds Senate vote, as conviction in an impeachment trial does, or only a majority vote. The Senate has previously used a majority vote.

The Senate has barred three people, all federal judges, from holding future office: West Humphreys (in 1862, for waging war against the U.S.), Robert Archbald (in 1913, for corruption) and Thomas Porteous (in 2010, for bribery and perjury).

The Senate has tried a former War Department secretary — William Belknap, in 1876 — after he resigned. Both the House and the Senate decided that Belknap could be tried after he had left office.

Disqualifying a president from future office, because of the stakes and lack of precedent, would probably come before the Supreme Court. History suggests that the court would be more likely to uphold a bipartisan congressional vote than a largely partisan one.

For more: “If an impeachment begins when an individual is in office, the process may surely continue after they resign or otherwise depart,” Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina School of Law writes in the online publication Just Security.


<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=314&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FNews12LI%2Fvideos%2F913666152737039%2F&show_text=false&width=560" width="560" height="314" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowFullScreen="true"></iframe>