Friday, May 2, 2025

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs confirms he rejected plea deal ahead of sex trafficking trial

 

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs confirms he rejected plea deal ahead of sex trafficking trial

Sean 'Diddy' Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges of sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution
By Adam Reiss and Janelle Griffith | NBC News • Published May 1, 2025 • Updated on May 1, 2025 at 7:09 pm

FILE – Sean Combs at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 25, 2020, in Beverly Hills, Calif.
Mark Von Holden/Invision/AP, File
FILE – Sean Combs at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 25, 2020, in Beverly Hills, Calif.

Sean “Diddy” Combs confirmed at a hearing Thursday that he had rejected a plea deal from federal prosecutors in his sex trafficking case, paving the way for his trial to begin next week.  

“Have you rejected the government’s offer?” U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, who is overseeing his trial in New York, asked him.  

“Yes, your honor,” Combs replied.  

Combs, wearing olive-colored clothing over a white thermal shirt, carried a black binder with notebooks in it as he entered the courtroom and waved to supporters in the gallery before he hugged and shook hands with his attorneys.  

He has pleaded not guilty to charges of sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. 

Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said that Combs’ legal team discussed the offer with him and that together they decided to reject it. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey said the proposal would have given Combs a lighter sentence than he would receive if he is found guilty at trial on all charges.

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' trial on sex trafficking charges scheduled for May 2025
he federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs is scheduled to start May 5, a judge in New York declared on Thursday.

The hearing was the last before the trial begins with jury selection Monday. Subramanian said voir dire, or the questioning of potential jurors, would be conducted in a way to protect jurors’ privacy, including possible disclosures about experiences with sexual or domestic abuse. 

Subramanian said he wanted to seat a jury of 12 and six alternates in three days.  

The court will call 50 jurors each day to the 26th-floor courtroom in Manhattan. Each juror will either be excused for cause or asked to return to the main courtroom for further questioning. 

The goal is to narrow the group to 45 people, who will each be interviewed separately with two attorneys from each side present. The court had requested 600 potential jurors. 

If prospective jurors want to speak privately, they will go into Subramanian’s chambers, where the media will be excluded, he said. The transcript for those parts would be sealed. 

Agnifilo had expressed concern that the media’s presence would prevent prospective jurors from speaking candidly.  

Given the amount of attention the case has received, particularly in recent days, Agnifilo asked the court to add a question to the juror survey, regarding a questionnaire already sent to prospective jurors: “Have you read anything since completing the questionnaire?” Subramanian agreed to do so. 

Comey said she understood the defense team had added two new attorneys and said prosecutors would like to know who they are. Agnifilo said that the new attorneys were in the courtroom, and that they would file their appearances by the end of the day. One of them is Xavier Donaldson, who has been present for several previous hearings.  

A prosecutor said at a hearing last week that Combs had been offered a plea deal, the details of which have not been made public. 

Subramanian asked all parties to be in his courtroom at 8 a.m. Monday and reminded them to avoid making public statements that could prejudice the trial’s outcome. 

The reminder came in response to a court filing this week, in which Combs’ attorneys asked Subramanian to bar lawyers for witnesses, including Douglas Wigdor and Lisa Bloom, who represent people who have filed separate civil suits against Combs, from speaking publicly about the trial until its conclusion.  

Combs attorney Teny Geragos said at Thursday’s hearing that Bloom had appeared on the BBC to try to bolster her client’s credibility. Bloom told the BBC that Richard was “absolutely terrified” of Combs. 

“It is deeply disturbing to us and could violate the rules of judicial conduct,” Geragos said.  

Bloom represents a John Doe and Dawn Richard, who was a member of two now-defunct groups formed by Combs, Danity Kane and a second one called Diddy — Dirty Money. 

“How hypocritical that Mr. Combs and his attorneys, having made public statements many times, now want to silence me,” Bloom said Thursday. “Accusers and their attorneys have every right to speak out. I am very proud to represent my brave clients, Dawn Richard and John Doe, in litigation against Mr. Combs.

"I look forward to attending Mr. Combs’ upcoming criminal trial in New York and continuing to advocate for my clients consistent with the law and the ethical rules.” 

Richard alleged in a suit filed last year, a week before Combs was arrested, that he had groped and threatened her and that she had witnessed him assaulting his former longtime girlfriend Cassie, whose full name is Casandra Ventura. Richards’ suit is pending, along with dozens of others filed by men and women accusing Combs of sexual misconduct, which Combs has vehemently denied. 

Wigdor represents Ventura, whose bombshell lawsuit filed in November 2023 preceded the federal raids of his home in March 2024 and criminal charges. Ventura accused Combs of years of physical and emotional abuse and and alleged that he forced her to have sex with male sex workers — encounters she said he called “freak offs” that were fueled by drugs and alcohol — while he masturbated and recorded them. Freak offs are at the center of the government’s case.

Ventura and Combs settled the lawsuit within a day without disclosing the terms and with Combs denying any wrongdoing.

Wigdor pledged to fight Combs’ efforts to prevent him from speaking publicly about the case.  

“We will vigorously oppose the motion seeking an extraordinary sweeping gag order as it is an obvious attempt at controlling and silencing victims and their counsel in contravention of well-established legal and ethical precedent,” he said in a statement. “Given this, it should come as no surprise that Combs fails to cite even one case to support his request.” 

Combs is alleged in his the five-count indictment to have coerced and threatened women to participate in sexual acts and silenced them through blackmail and violence. Prosecutors allege he had help from a network of associates and employees.

This story first appeared on NBCNews.com. More from NBC News:


North, Central and South America: Origins

 Where did the North, Central and South American natives come from?


The majority of Native Americans in both North and South America are believed to be descendants of people who migrated from Asia to the Americas, crossing the Bering Strait land bridge between 16,500 and 30,000 years ago. This theory is supported by archaeological and genetic evidence. 


Elaboration:
.
During the last Ice Age, lower sea levels exposed a land bridge between northeastern Asia and northwestern North America, allowing human migration from Asia. 
.
Scientists estimate that the first migrations occurred between 16,500 and 30,000 years ago. 
.
These early migrants spread throughout North, Central, and South America, eventually populating the entire continent. 
.
While the Bering Strait is the most widely accepted route, some researchers propose alternative migration paths, such as coastal routes along the Pacific Rim. 
Genetic Evidence:  Genetic evidence refers to the biological data derived from the DNA of organisms, which can be used to trace lineage, migration patterns, and evolutionary relationships.
.
Genetic studies support the theory of a single founding population that originated in Asia and then diversified as they spread throughout the Americas. 

us history – before 1865 review

key term - Genetic evidence

Definition
Genetic evidence refers to the biological data derived from the DNA of organisms, which can be used to trace lineage, migration patterns, and evolutionary relationships. This type of evidence has become crucial in understanding how early human populations migrated, particularly through the Bering Strait land bridge, revealing insights about the peopling of the Americas and the genetic connections between ancient and modern populations.

5 Must Know Facts 
Genetic evidence has shown that populations migrated from Asia to North America via the Bering Strait land bridge during the last Ice Age, around 15,000 years ago.

 

Studies of ancient DNA have revealed that early inhabitants of the Americas were genetically diverse, indicating multiple waves of migration and adaptation to different environments.

 

Modern genetic techniques allow scientists to compare ancient DNA with contemporary populations, helping to identify shared ancestry and migration routes.

 

Genetic evidence supports theories that suggest some groups migrated along coastal routes rather than solely overland through the interior of North America.

 

The analysis of genetic markers has helped establish connections between Native American populations and Siberian ancestors, illustrating the complex history of human migration.


 DNA sequencing: The process of determining the precise order of nucleotides within a DNA molecule, which provides valuable information about genetic relationships and ancestry.


Anthropology: The study of humans, their behavior, culture, and evolution, which often incorporates genetic evidence to better understand human history.


Mitochondrial DNA: A type of DNA that is inherited maternally and can be used to trace lineage and maternal ancestry over generations.


Ancient DNA confirms Native Americans' deep roots in North and South America

Trove of ancient samples reveals 11,000 years of unknown genetic history

a Surui man walks down a road in the forest
The Suruí from the Brazilian Amazon carry traces of Australasian ancestry, now confirmed to have arrived in South America more than 10,400 years ago.Craig Stennett/Alamy Stock Photo

For decades, scientists could describe the peopling of the Americas only in broad strokes, leaving plenty of mysteries about when and how people spread across the continents. Now, state-of-the-art ancient DNA methods, applied to scores of new samples from around the Americas, are filling in the picture. Two independent studies, published in Cell and online in Science, find that ancient populations expanded rapidly across the Americas about 13,000 years ago. They also emphasize that the story continued in the thousands of years since, revealing previously undocumented, large-scale movements between North and South America.

The data include 64 newly sequenced ancient DNA samples from Alaska to Patagonia, spanning more than 10,000 years of genetic history. "The numbers [of samples] are just extraordinary," says Ben Potter, an archaeologist at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks. Prior to these studies, only six genomes older than 6000 years from the Americas had been sequenced. As a result, says Jennifer Raff, an anthropological geneticist at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, "The [genetic] models that we've been using to explain the peopling of the Americas have always been oversimplified."

Eske Willerslev, an evolutionary geneticist at the University of Copenhagen who led the Science team, worked closely with the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe in Nevada to gain access to some of the new samples. The tribe had been fighting to repatriate 10,700-year-old remains found in Nevada's Spirit Cave and had resisted destructive genetic testing. But when Willerslev visited the tribe in person and vowed to do the work only with their permission, the tribe agreed, hoping the result would bolster their case for repatriation.

It did. Willerslev found that the remains from Spirit Cave are most closely related to living Native Americans. That strengthened the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe's claim to the bones, which were returned to them in 2016 and reburied. Willerslev's study validates that "this is our homeland, these are our ancestors," says Rochanne Downs, the tribe's cultural coordinator.

Willerslev added the Spirit Cave data to 14 other new whole genomes from sites scattered from Alaska to Chile and ranging from 10,700 to 500 years old. His data join an even bigger trove published in Cell by a team led by population geneticist David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston. They analyzed DNA from 49 new samples from Central and South America dating from 10,900 to 700 years old, at more than 1.2 million positions across the genome. All told, the data decisively dispel suggestions, based on the distinctive skull shape of a few ancient remains, that early populations had a different ancestry from today's Native Americans. "Native Americans truly did originate in the Americas, as a genetically and culturally distinctive group. They are absolutely indigenous to this continent," Raff says.

A trail of DNA

Two new papers add DNA from 64 ancient individuals to the sparse genetic record of the Americas. They show that people related to the Anzick child, part of the Clovis culture, quickly spread across both North and South America about 13,000 years ago.
Sample sizeOneEightTeam leaderPreviously publishedEske WillerslevDavid ReichUpward Sun River11,500 years agoAncient BeringianSpirit Cave10,700 years agoLovelock Cave2000–600 years agoAnzick12,700 years agoMonte Verde14,500+ years agoLapa do Santo9600 years agoLagoa Santa10,400–9600 years agoAustralasian ancestryNorthernNative AmericansSouthernNative Americans
(MAP) C. POSTH ET AL.CELL, 175 (2018) ADAPTED BY J. YOU/SCIENCE; (DATA) J. MORENO-MAYAR ET AL.SCIENCE 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAV2621

The two studies also provide an unprecedented view of how ancient Americans moved across the continent beginning about 13,000 years ago. Previous genetic work had suggested the ancestors of Native Americans split from Siberians and East Asians about 25,000 years ago, perhaps when they entered the now mostly drowned landmass of Beringia, which bridged the Russian Far East and North America. Some populations stayed isolated in Beringia, and Willerslev sequenced one new example of such an "Ancient Beringian," 9000-year-old remains from Alaska's Seward peninsula. Meanwhile, other groups headed south. At some point, those that journeyed south of the ice sheets split into two groups—"Southern Native Americans" and "Northern Native Americans" (also sometimes called Ancestral A and B lineages), who went on to populate the continents.

Advertisement

By looking for genetic similarities between far-flung samples, both papers add detail—some of it puzzling—to this pattern. The 12,700-year-old Anzick child from Montana, who is associated with the mammoth-hunting Clovis culture, known for their distinctive spear points, provided a key reference point. Willerslev detected Anzick-related ancestry in both the Spirit Cave individual—who is associated with western stemmed tools, a tradition likely older than Clovis—and 10,000-year-old remains from Lagoa Santa in Brazil. Reich's team found an even closer relationship between Anzick and 9300- to 10,900-year-old samples from Chile, Brazil, and Belize.

Those close genetic affinities at similar times but across vast distances suggest people must have moved rapidly across the Americas, with little time to evolve into distinct genetic groups. Reich's team argues that Clovis technology might have spurred this rapid expansion. But anthropological geneticist Deborah Bolnick of the University of Connecticut in Storrs notes the Anzick-related ancestry group may have been broader than the Clovis people, and doubts that the culture was a driver.

Willerslev also finds traces of this Anzick-related ancestry in later samples from South America and Lovelock Cave in Nevada. But in Reich's data it fades starting about 9000 years ago in much of South America, suggesting "a major population replacement," he says.

After that population turnover in South America, both teams see striking genetic continuity in many regions. But that doesn't mean no one moved around. Reich's group sees a new genetic signal entering the central Andes about 4200 years ago, carried by people who are most closely related to ancient inhabitants of the Channel Islands, off Southern California. Meanwhile, Willerslev's team detects ancestry related to the present-day Mixe, an Indigenous group from Oaxaca in Mexico, spreading to South America about 6000 years ago and North America about 1000 years ago. Neither of these migrations replaced local communities, but rather mixed with them. Both teams say they could be seeing the same signal, but "without comparing the data, it's really hard to tell," says archaeogeneticist Cosimo Posth of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany, the first author of the Cell paper.

Just as mysterious is the trace of Australasian ancestry in some ancient South Americans. Reich and others had previously seen hints of it in living people in the Brazilian Amazon. Now, Willerslev has provided more evidence: telltale DNA in one person from Lagoa Santa in Brazil, who lived 10,400 years ago. "How did it get there? We have no idea," says geneticist José Víctor Moreno-Mayar of the University of Copenhagen, first author of the Willerslev paper.

The signal doesn't appear in any other of the team's samples, "somehow leaping over all of North America in a single bound," says co-author and archaeologist David Meltzer of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. He wonders whether that Australasian ancestry was confined to a small population of Siberian migrants who remained isolated from other Native American ancestors throughout the journey through Beringia and the Americas. That suggests individual groups may have moved into the continents without mixing.

Delighted as they are with the data in the new studies, scientists want more. Meltzer points out that none of the new samples can illuminate what's happening at pre-Clovis sites such as Chile's Monte Verde, which was occupied 14,500 years ago. And Potter notes that, "We have a huge, gaping hole in the central and eastern North American [sampling] record. … These papers aren't the final words."

The Origin of Amerindians and the Peopling of the Americas According to HLA Genes: Admixture with Asian and Pacific People