Thursday, September 17, 2015

TRUMP ROAST: Carly Fiorina takes charge in round two of GOP debate — scores big applause when clashing with The Donald


Making her debut on the main stage Republican presidential debate, Carly Fiorina took charge — frequently tangling with front-runner Donald Trump while raising her profile in the crowded GOP primary.

Carly Fiorina shines in round two of GOP debate, clashes with Donald Trump

BY CELESTE KATZ , ERIN DURKIN  NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Updated: Thursday, September 17, 2015, 7:42 AM

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. — In a combative field of 10 men, the lone woman stood out.

Carly Fiorina took charge in her debut on the main Republican presidential debate stage Wednesday, going toe to toe with front-runner Donald Trump - and further elevating her profile in a crowded GOP primary.

TWITTER REACTS TO SECOND GOP DEBATE

Fiorina's breakout performance came as the candidates piled onto Trump, who ripped into each of them - as moderators from debate host CNN served up opportunities to slash the bombastic billionaire's views and campaign-trail antics.

The one-liner trading between Trump and the rest of the field dominated the showdown until struggling Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker called foul.

"This is what's wrong with this debate. We're not talking about real issues," Walker said - before slipping in a zinger of his own: "And Mr. Trump, we don't need an apprentice in the White House. We have one right now."

JEB BUSH ADMITS HE SMOKED MARIJUANA 40 YEARS AGO

Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Fiorina scored one of the biggest applause lines of the night when she coolly suggested Trump's attacks on her looks would alienate him from female voters.

"I think women all over the country heard very clearly what Mr. Trump said," said Fiorina, whose strong performance in the under-card "kiddie table" of the cycle's first TV debate in August helped land her a podium at Wednesday's main event.

"Look at that face," Trump said of Fiorina last week in Rolling Stone. "Would anyone vote for that?"

At Wednesday's face off, the traditionally unapologetic Trump somewhat sheepishly extended an olive branch as Fiorina stood icily by: "I think she's got a beautiful face, and I think she's a beautiful woman."



The squabble was one of many between Donald Trump and Jeb Bush.
The squabble was one of many between Donald Trump and Jeb Bush.

DONALD TRUMP CLAIMS VACCINATIONS ARE LINKED TO AUTISM

The two business moguls later clashed over their records - with Fiorina charging Trump couldn't be trusted to handle the federal government's purse strings because his companies went into bankruptcy a "record four times."

Trump countered with attacks on Fiorina's record at HP - from which she got fired after overseeing substantial layoffs - until the rivals' domination of the debate prompted a frustrated New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to jump in.

"You're both successful people. Congratulations," scoffed Christie, who's struggled to capture voters' attention. "You know who's not successful? The middle class in this country who's getting plowed over by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Let's start talking about those issues tonight - and stop this childish back-and-forth between the two of you."


The hand-to-hand combat between Fiorina and Trump seemed at times to relegate other candidates to a battle for the moderator's attention or to stop the intramural bloodbath in favor of a united attack on the Democrats.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie reacts during the debate.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie reacts during the debate.

Fiorina and Trump’s fire-and-ice exchanges stood in contrast, for example, to the modulated tones of pediatric neurosurgeon Ben Carson, who has jumped to second place in the primary polls, and to the generally positive message purveyed by Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

In one of the three-hour debate's most dramatic moments, Fiorina appealed to conservatives with a passionate - and graphic - denunciation of Planned Parenthood.

"I dare Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama to watch these tapes," Fiorina said of controversial sting videos that have prompted conservative calls to defund the organization.

"Watch a fully formed fetus on the table - its heart beating, its legs kicking - while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain. This is about the character of our nation, and if we will not stand up in and force President Obama to veto this bill, shame on us."


Candidates at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library were intentionally stationed just inches from each other in front of the late president's Air Force One to encourage maximum conflict - and the focus was on Trump from the start.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said the bombastic billionaire's history of vitriolic personal attacks made him unfit for the White House.

"Short, tall, fat, ugly. My goodness. That happened in junior high, are we not above that?" said Paul, taking on Trump's penchant for personal attacks against women and opponents.

Trump moved quickly to shut Paul down in vintage style: "I never attacked him on his looks - and believe me, there's plenty of subject matter there."

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush got into it with Trump over special interest money and the record of Bush's brother, former President George W. Bush.


Defending his brother's military record, Bush said, "He kept us safe."

"I don't know. You feel safe right now?" Trump shot back. "I don't feel so safe."

The intense focus on Trump frustrated some commentators -- and the sheer number of candidates and questions left others whipsawed.

Moderator "Jake Tapper is like a reality-show producer whose every question tries to create drama by playing two people against each other," griped Twitter user @realityblurred.


With 11 candidates on stage, said the University of Virginia's Larry Sabato, the program ultimately punished watchers with a "dizzying pace and switching of topics."

 ON A MOBILE DEVICE? WATCH FIORINA'S TOP MOMENTS. WATCH TRUMP'S TOP MOMENTS.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Racism



The following is what so many have to say about racism. Some are deep and some are simple thoughts on the ugly culture of hate and ignorance which we live in and around in the 21st century. 
If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. 

"This has nothing to do with the victims. This has everything to do with the culture of demeaning a person of color. And there is no justification for society where my son has a far greater chance of being stopped, held, killed, than your son, simply because he's black." From an interview with Charlie Rose on PBS, Bryant Gumbel, host of Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel.

The problem is that white people see racism as conscious hate, when racism is bigger than that. Racism is a complex system of social and political levers and pulleys set up generations ago to continue working on the behalf of whites at other people’s expense, whether whites know/like it or not. Racism is an insidious cultural disease. It is so insidious that it doesn’t care if you are a white person who likes black people; it’s still going to find a way to infect how you deal with people who don’t look like you. Yes, racism looks like hate, but hate is just one manifestation. Privilege is another. Access is another. Ignorance is another. Apathy is another. And so on. So while I agree with people who say no one is born racist, it remains a powerful system that we’re immediately born into. It’s like being born into air: you take it in as soon as you breathe. It’s not a cold that you can get over. There is no anti-racist certification class. It’s a set of socioeconomic traps and cultural values that are fired up every time we interact with the world. It is a thing you have to keep scooping out of the boat of your life to keep from drowning in it. I know it’s hard work, but it’s the price you pay for owning everything. ~Scott Woods

People know about the Klan and the overt racism, but the killing of one’s soul little by little, day after day, is a lot worse than someone coming in your house and lynching you. ~Samuel L. Jackson

Most middle-class whites have no idea what it feels like to be subjected to police who are routinely suspicious, rude, belligerent, and brutal. ~Benjamin Spock

We have made enormous progress in teaching everyone that racism is bad. Where we seem to have dropped the ball… is in teaching people what racism actually IS. ~Jon Stewart

Things like racism are institutionalized. You might not know any bigots. You feel like “well I don’t hate black people so I’m not a racist,” but you benefit from racism. Just by the merit, the color of your skin. The opportunities that you have, you’re privileged in ways that you might not even realize because you haven’t been deprived of certain things. We need to talk about these things in order for them to change. Dave Chappelle

The police can go to downtown Harlem and pick up a kid with a joint in the streets. But they can’t go into the elegant apartments and get a stockbroker who’s sniffing cocaine. ~Noam Chomsky

Often white people hear blame whenever the issue of racism is brought up, whether or not blame has been placed on whites. As beneficiaries of racism and white privilege, you sometimes take a defensive posture even when you are not being individually blamed. You may personalize the remarks, not directed personally at you. It is the arrogance of your privilege that drags the focus back to whites. When whites are being blamed or personally accused of racist behavior, this defensiveness and denial further alienate you and may preclude you from examining your possible racist behavior. ~Debra Leigh

More than 2 million people found themselves behind bars at the turn of the twenty-first century, and millions more were relegated to the margins of mainstream society, banished to a political and social space not unlike Jim Crow, where discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education was perfectly legal, and where they could be denied the right to vote. The system functioned relatively automatically, and the prevailing system of racial meanings, identities, and ideologies already seemed natural. Ninety percent of those admitted to prison for drug offenses in many states were black or Latino, yet the mass incarceration of communities of color was explained in race-neutral terms, an adaptation to the needs and demands of the current political climate. ~Michelle Alexander



“Of course innocent mistakes occur but the accumulated insults and indignations caused by racial presumptions are destructive in ways that are hard to measure. Constantly being suspected, accused, watched, doubted, distrusted, presumed guilty, and even feared is a burden born by people of color that can't be understood or confronted without a deeper conversation about our history of racial injustice.” ― Bryan StevensonJust Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption

“I've also represented people who have committed terrible crimes but nonetheless struggle to recover and to find redemption. I have discovered, deep in the hearts of many condemned and incarcerated people, the scattered traces of hope and humanity - seeds of restoration that come to astonishing life when nurtured by very simple interventions.

Proximity has taught me some basic and humbling truths, including this vital lesson: Each of us is more than the worst thing we've ever done. My work with the poor and incarcerated has persuaded me that the opposite of poverty is not wealth; the opposite of poverty is justice. Finally, I've come to believe that the true measure of our commitment to justice, the character of our society, our commitment to the rule of law, fairness, and equality cannot be measured by how we treat the rich, the powerful, the privileged, and the respected among us. The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned.

We are all implicated when we allow other people to be mistreated. An absence of compassion can corrupt the decency of a community, a state, a nation. Fear and anger can make us vindictive and abusive, unjust and unfair, until we all suffer from the absence of mercy and we condemn ourselves as much as we victimize others. The closer we get to mass incarceration and extreme levels of punishment, the more I believe it's never to recognize that we all need mercy, we all need justice, and - perhaps - we all need some measure of unmerited grace.” 
― Bryan Stevenson

“Between 1990 and 2005, a new prison opened in the United States every ten days. Prison growth and the resulting “prison-industrial complex”—the business interests that capitalize on prison construction—made imprisonment so profitable that millions of dollars were spent lobbying state legislators to keep expanding the use of incarceration to respond to just about any problem. Incarceration became the answer to everything—health care problems like drug addiction, poverty that had led someone to write a bad check, child behavioral disorders, managing the mentally disabled poor, even immigration issues generated responses from legislators that involved sending people to prison. Never before had so much lobbying money been spent to expand America’s prison population, block sentencing reforms, create new crime categories, and sustain the fear and anger that fuel mass incarceration than during the last twenty-five years in the United States.” 
― Bryan Stevenson, Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption

“...racist thought and action says far more about the person they come from than the person they are directed at.” ― Chris Crutcher, Whale Talk

White people don’t like to believe that they practice identity politics. The defining part of being white in America is the assumption that, as a white person, you are a regular, individual human being. Other demographic groups set themselves apart, to pursue their distinctive identities and interests and agendas. Whiteness, to white people, is the American default. ~Tom Scocca














Friday, September 4, 2015

Beware of the Arch-Deceivers: GOP's Issues With Race

"Democrats are the real racists!": Inside the GOP's pathetic & insulting response to charges of bigotry
Too bad The GOP created the environment in which Donald Trump is now tearing the Republicans apart by being the least productive Congress ever only because they wanted to spite President Obama. 

So sad is it that the Republican party (GOP) is in such disarray that they cannot seem to pull themselves together. There seems to be nothing but false talking points, smokescreens, lies and distractions in the form of attacks on Hillary Clinton and President Obama. 
Why are the Republicans in their current state of political disorientation? First, they have this tendency to judge and condemn harshly certain groups like liberals, those who are pro-choice, immigrants. As well, they tend to alienate women and African-Americans. 
It is no secret that the GOP base consist mostly of uneducated bigots and racist that Republican politician pander to during elections. They call it firing up the base. They use certain phrases and terminology that generally contain racist overtones and/or are well within the realm of bigotry. "Let's take back our country" is one of their battle cries. 
To prove my point let us take a trip down memory lane. To understand where we are now we should know a little about the Republican Party (GOP) and it's history concern African-Americans/Blacks.
In 1968, Richard Nixon realized he could not become president unless he made a deeply cynical move: convincing southern racists to vote Republican.

The trouble was, they hadn't done that since the Republican Abe Lincoln freed the slaves. But Nixon calculated that the Democratic "Solid South" could now be broken open: after the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and '64, and the Voting Rights Act of '65, racists, feeling betrayed and furious, were looking for a new home.

So, in what became known as the Southern Strategy, Nixon invited racists into the GOP. Ever since, the racists have been essential to the party's "winning coalition," the collection of targeted groups that can add up to electoral victory.

Not all Republicans are racists, of course. But without racists, I don't think the GOP can win elections.

Not the kind of thing you want to talk about openly, though. So Republican politicians have become fluent in a kind of code, which they use to communicate with the ugly part of their base without offending polite society. In 1981, GOP consultant Lee Atwater offered a guide in an interview: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" -- that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.

More recent examples: "taking back our country," voter ID, border security and birtherism.

But now, along comes a cartoon racist like Donald Trump, who ignores the code and drops the veil from the GOP's structural racism. In response, Republican politicians pronounce themselves shocked to see such blatant bigotry, naked and unashamed.

It's a tough sell. The GOP has been doing a racist strip tease for decades now, and Trump is just skipping the tease. Only a few years ago, Senator Lindsey Graham could safely flirt with anti-immigrant racism on Fox News. Now, he's forced to go on CNN and publicly disown Trump's very similar comments, calling him a "wrecking ball for the future of the Republican Party with the Hispanic community."

So embarrassing.

But it may point to a possible upside. Thanks to gauche clowns like Trump -- not to mention Cliven BundySteve King and others -- the GOP, like the Democratic Party of the 60s, might be forced to reform itself, if only to end the pain.


Because the party is finally experiencing the agony of racism in a form it can't ignore: bad PR. ~from The Huff Post article by Spencer Critchley "Trump Has Exposed GOP Racism" Posted: 07/13/2015 4:03 pm EDT Updated: 07/13/2015 4:59 pm EDT~

 To further drive my point home is another article from the The Huffington Post By Jackson Connor entitled "MSNBC's Chris Matthews Accuses GOP Of Keeping Jim Crow Alive In 21st Century"

 The thought of Chris Matthews railing against Republicans isn't anything new. But during the final segment of "Hardball" Thursday night, the MSNBC host seemed particularly riled up, accusing the GOP of ushering in a new era of Jim Crow with their treatment of the country's first black president.

Matthews said he believes Americans will see Barack Obama's time in the White House in "sharper contrast” in years to come, taking into account the antics he's had to endure from his conservative foes since taking office. According to Matthews, the GOP's primary goal has been to make sure the president "accomplishes nothing" and "gets booted from office as quickly as possible.”

The host pointed to numerous examples of Republican temper tantrums, listing Sen. Tom Cotton's (R-Ark.) recent letter to Iran, subverting Obama's ongoing nuclear negotiations, and Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) shouting “You lie,” during the president's 2009 health care speech, among the most egregious.

“They will read all this and wonder, 'What was it that made this Republican opposition so all out contemptuous of an American president?'” Matthews said. “'What made it treat him as below respect, below the dignity historically accorded his office?'”

The answer, Matthews suggested (and it's been suggested before), stems from President Obama's race.

"They will then look at a picture of this president, a picture of this man," Matthews said, "and perhaps get the idea that the age of Jim Crow managed to find a new habitat in the early 21st century Republican Party.”

H/T Mediaite

  As a reply to people calling the Republicans out for their racism they say that it is the Democrats who are the real racist. Some of the facts concerning this are laid out in the following article: "Democrats are the real racists!: Inside the GOP’s pathetic & insulting response to charges of bigotry" If you're a Republican, how exactly do you explain away Donald Trump's hideous comments about Mexicans? by HEATHER DIGBY PARTON

  If there is a more fatuous right wing trope than “Martin Luther King was a Republican” it has to be the utterly nonsensical line that Democrats are the true racists because they were the southern party during Jim Crow. Inevitably, in any discussion of race, some smart-aleck troll smugly interjects the irrelevant fact that the departed Democratic Senator Robert Byrd was a member of the KKK and some very clever boy or girl shares the astonishingly obvious fact that Republican Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Case closed, Democrats are the racists and the Republicans are the African Americans’ true allies.

I’m not going to go over the same tired ground that hundreds of others have covered to refute this foolishness. Even the trolls know that many millions of people who used to vote for Democrats switched parties after the various civil rights acts were passed in the ’60s under a Democratic majority. While they deny there was ever such a thing as the “Southern Strategy,” and pretend that racist appeals for votes never happened, that’s also a documented fact and they know that too.

But just because conservatives are clearly playing games, it doesn’t lessen the insult to African Americans when they make these inane claims. After all, if Democrats are the “real racists,” then 95 percent are African Americans must be very dumb indeed.

Here’s one of conservatives’ more “entertaining” strategies for proving their specious argument, from a chain email I received some time back, a painfully awkward attempt at satirizing the voice of a supposedly Democratic racist:

REWARD!

CAPTURE and RETURN  RUNAWAYS from the Democratic Party’s LIBERAL PLANTATION.

Any Person of Color claiming to be Republican, Conservative or a member of the Tea Party is suspect and should be berated, insulted, abused and returned.

BE ON THE LOOK-OUT

Runaways often speaking in an uppity manner about right the individual, personal responsibility an greatness of America and other such nonsense.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

THE PARTY OF JIM CROW

THE PARTY OF BULL CONNOR

in the not so distant past would lynch People of Color for voting Republican.

Then we learned it’s far better to just buy their votes using taxpayer money and for over forty years that’s what we have done!

WE OWN THEM.

*Amount of cash reward pending results of our fund-raising efforts. You didn’t expect us to use our own money, did you?

Those are words on a widely trafficked chain email, based upon real runaway slave posters. And it is disgusting, not only for the revolting imagery, but for making a mockery of the horror of slavery itself. After all, what this is is saying is that the vast majority of African Americans are “owned” by the Democratic Party, not because they’ve been bought but because they’ve been “bought-off,” and by implication have no sense of personal responsibility or belief in the “greatness of America.”

Again, this is a truly specious line of argument. They are saying that Black people vote Democratic because they’ve been “bought off” with all that generous welfare and food stamp money. The only “good” Black people, therefore, are the “runaways” who vote Republican. (Could they be any more contemptuous of the people they are supposed to be defending?) This “liberal plantation” concept, while not always as crudely expressed as in the aforementioned email, is pervasive among right wingers. And truthfully, this argument is often deployed by African American conservatives who obviously have a claim to use the imagery even though their message is insulting to the vast number of fellow African Americans who vote Democratic.

The question of why Black Americans vote for Democrats is not a mystery and it has nothing to do with being “bought (off).” As everyone surely knows, when they were allowed to do it at all, black Americans traditionally voted for the party of Abraham Lincoln for many years. This was for obvious reasons — he was the man who freed the slaves. But as this article in the Washington Post points out, African Americans started voting for Democrats long before they allegedly started chasing all that free government money:

[The] Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies pulled data from independent research, Gallup polling, exit polls, professional polling firms and their own surveys to put together a look at the partisan makeup of black voters since the administration of Franklin Roosevelt. That the data start in 1936 and not, say, with the emancipation of slaves after the Civil War — thanks largely to a Republican president — is because the ability of black Americans to vote was regularly restricted and uneven. 
  In the decade before 1948, black Americans identified as Democrats about as often as they did Republicans. In 1948, as Real Clear Politics’ Jay Cost wrote a few years ago, Democrat Harry Truman made an explicit appeal for new civil rights measures from Congress, including voter protections, a federal ban on lynching and bolstering existing civil rights laws. That year, the number of blacks identifying as Democrats increased.

The second big jump is the one that you likely thought of first: The Civil Rights Act of 1964. Its passage in July of that year was the culmination of a long political struggle that played out on Capitol Hill. When he signed the bill, President Lyndon Johnson reportedly said that Democrats would, as a result, lose the South for a generation. It’s been longer than that.[…]

It’s worth [looking at the] Democratic vote in the heart of the South, including Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina. The average support for the Democratic candidate each year has slipped downward, but plummeted in 1948 and 1964. In the latter year, those states backed Barry Goldwater. In the former, they largely backed the States Rights party candidate, Strom Thurmond.

Black Americans have many reason to vote Democratic. But it was two Democratic presidents proposing civil rights legislation that made them leave the Republican Party in large numbers. Likewise, it was that same movement for civil rights that made many of those white Southern Democrats switch to the GOP.

And the Republican party is still having a problem dealing with the fallout. As Brian Beutler points out in this piece at The New Republic:

[S]ince the 2012 election Republicans have been engaged in a quiet and unresolved debate amongst themselves over which of the following three strategic reforms to pursue:

1) Making genuine, substantive concessions to minority voters.

2) Making symbolic and rhetorical concessions to minority voters, without making significant changes to the GOP’s substantive agenda.

3) Making no concessions to minority voters whatsoever, while working to increase the GOP’s already impressive margins among white voters.

Two developments in the past month—the mass killing of black worshippers by a white supremacist at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC, and the launch of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign—have thrown into stark relief how badly option one lost out to options two and three. The ongoing Republican presidential primary has become a contest to determine which of the latter two models the party will adopt in the 2016 election.

The hesitancy of the GOP presidential candidates to step up in the wake of the Charleston massacre says everything about their “outreach” to African Americans. The popularity of Donald Trump’s crude nativism among the base likewise illuminates their difficulty in attracting Latinos in sufficient numbers to win a national election. They are stuck.

But what can they expect? When you have people constantly spewing vacuous nonsense about the Democrats being the party of racism even as you are insulting African Americans to their faces, it’s hard to make a case for minorities voting for your party. Calling immigrants a bunch of rapists and criminals and rising dramatically in the GOP primary polls isn’t exactly a friendly gesture of inclusion.

Whether they like it or not, it is a historical fact that many people who were once members of the Democratic Party switched their affiliation to the GOP when the Democrats voted for civil rights legislation and Democratic presidents signed it. This is not a debatable point. That so many Republicans choose to pretend this isn’t so is either a sign that they are arguing in bad faith or they are living in denial. Either way, it won’t solve their problem: they just have no idea what to do about all the resentful white voters they’ve been opportunistically coaxing into their coalition for the last few decades. They can try to prevent people from voting and they can pretend that “illegal immigrants” are stealing elections. But it won’t change the fundamental reality that they are on the wrong side of history and have been for a very long time.

Heather Digby Parton, also known as "Digby," is a contributing writer to Salon. She was the winner of the 2014 Hillman Prize for Opinion and Analysis Journalism.

 Bernie Sanders Rips Donald Trump While Calling Out The Bigoted Billionaire’s Racism

By: Jason Easley

Bernie Sanders Latino Roundtable Iowa
Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) ripped Donald Trump at a Latino roundtable in Iowa. Sanders stood up to the 
Republican bully by calling out Trump’s racism.


According to the Sanders campaign:


In a statement, Sanders said: “This country has experienced racism for hundreds of years. I would have hoped that by the year 2015 leading candidates for president like Mr. Trump would campaign on their ideas as to how they can address our serious problems, and not by trying to divide the country with racist and demagogic appeals. Clearly Trump is scapegoating the Hispanic community. Immigrants are not responsible,” Sanders stressed, “for the disappearing American middle class, the Wall Street collapse brought on by huge financial institutions’ greed and illegal behavior, the war in Iraq, income inequality or climate change.”
At the roundtable discussion, Sanders called Trump’s comments “mean” and “denigrating” to an entire group of people and accused him of using Latinos as “whipping boys” to distract attention from real problems confronting the country. He called it “absurd, racist and wrong” to blame immigrants for the nation’s problems.

“That is absolutely unacceptable,” the senator added during the roundtable discussion at the Muscatine County Boxing Club. “That kind of discourse should be removed from our politics.”

Sen. Sanders was correct. Donald Trump is scapegoating the Hispanic community, but Trump is merely building on the precedent that has been set by his party. The Republican Party has been trying to distract the country from their unpopular policies by playing up their imaginary immigration menace for nearly a decade.

Trump has brought the thinly veiled racial dog whistles that Republicans have been using out the open by being extremely blunt and direct about his bigotry.

Bernie Sanders has integrity and courage, which is why he directly confronted Trump and ripped him for his racist tactics. The “campaign strategy” is that Donald Trump is using should have been roundly condemned by the Republican Party. Instead of doing the decent thing, Republican presidential candidates have scrambled to follow Trump’s lead and cater to the bigots among their voters.


Since Republicans are too afraid to stand up to the bully, Bernie Sanders has risen to knock Trump down.

The GOP isn’t in trouble because of their racist base, they’re in trouble because they’re assholes


Conservatives — whose week went bad when retailers stopped selling southern treason flags before turning unbearable when the Supreme Court re-shoved affordable health care down America’s throat today  — are in a bit of a slump. After being smacked across the snout with a rolled-up copy of Modern Etiquette and told it was considered déclassé to wave a Confederate flag while killing black churchgoers, they are doing a little soul searching and discovering that their soul looks like a raisin that fell under the refrigerator over a year ago.

According to Matt Lewis at The Daily Beast, Republicans need to take a hard look at this whole dogwhistlin’, red-meat tossin’, hunkerin’ down in the dust with southern yahoos and talking about them thar obstreperous and uppity colored folk.

The injection of Southerners into the Republican coalition—a coalition they ultimately came to dominate—couldn’t help but change the image of the GOP. There were racial, cultural, political, and even religious implications. Republicans captured the South, yes, but the South also captured the GOP. There were no doubt many salutary benefits to this arrangement—most obviously, an electoral boon that lasted for decades. But it also guaranteed we would eventually see a day of reckoning.
Lewis then goes on to soft-peddle the “Southern Strategy,” writing “Whether or not you accept that this was an intentional strategy…”

It almost as if he is blissfully unaware of the late campaign wizard Lee Atwater bluntly describing it no uncertain terms as the way to the promised land.

Here is Atwater to explain it for the dim at heart:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*gger, n*gger, n*gger.” By 1968 you can’t say “n*gger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*gger, n*gger.”
I can see how someone might find that unclear when their thesis is dependent upon pretending it doesn’t exist — but let’s move on.

Lewis is concerned that, having allowed  their Confederate flag-waving crazy cousins into a Republican big tent that is whiter than a Wes Anderson movie, the Republicans can’t get their message heard over all of the yee-hawing, drunken political fistfights, and guns a’shootin’ into the air.

So here’s what the GOP has to figure it out: How do they continue to get the Bubba vote while shedding appeals to the cultural symbolism of the past? How do they sell their conservative ideas about free markets, strong national defense, and conservative family values to 21st-century Americans?
Here is the problem with that.

That is what Romney ran on in 2012 and the electorate was all, “Nah, we’ll pass” and Romney at least had the virtue of seeming like a decent –albeit out of touch — guy with sincerely held beliefs that were equally out of touch with anyone not still living in the 50’s.

This election go-around the party bus is top-heavy with smarmy assholes like Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, and Scott Walker, insincere assholes like Rand Paul and Jeb Bush, dumb assholes like Rick Perry, and executive assholes like Donald Trump and Carly Fiorina. To his credit, Marco Rubio to this point only seems like a sweaty overachiever, but the debates may push him into belching forth something equally assholish.

The problem for the GOP is both the medium and the message.  And even if they can somehow tamp down the party’s inherent racism –which is a feature and not a bug — in an election that most likely won’t feature a person of the dusky hue, they’re still going to have to explain that giving more tax cuts to the rich, starting up a few new wars, stripping millions of people of healthcare benefits, while trashing women, minorities, seniors, the poor, unions, gays, and science is what America is yearning for.


Good luck with that, guys. See you on the other side.


The GOP isn’t in trouble because of their racist base, they’re in trouble because they’re assholes


Thursday, September 3, 2015

NASA ~ Comet Hitchhiker and Saturn's Rings


This artist concept shows Comet Hitchhiker, an idea for traveling between asteroids and comets using a harpoon and tether system. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornelius Dammrich
Comet Hitchhiker Would Take Tour of Small Bodies

Catching a ride from one solar system body to another isn't easy. You have to figure out how to land your spacecraft safely and then get it on its way to the next destination. The landing part is especially tricky for asteroids and comets, which have low gravitational pull.

A concept called Comet Hitchhiker, developed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, puts forth a new way to get into orbit and land on comets and asteroids, using the kinetic energy -- the energy of motion -- of these small bodies. Masahiro Ono, the principal investigator based at JPL, had "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" in mind when dreaming up the idea.

"Hitchhiking a celestial body is not as simple as sticking out your thumb, because it flies at an astronomical speed and it won't stop to pick you up. Instead of a thumb, our idea is to use a harpoon and a tether," Ono said. Ono is presenting results about the concept at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics SPACE conference on September 1.

A reusable tether system would replace the need for propellant for entering orbit and landing, so running out wouldn't be an issue, according to the concept design.

While closely flying by the target, a spacecraft would first cast an extendable tether toward the asteroid or comet and attach itself using a harpoon attached to the tether. Next, the spacecraft would reel out the tether while applying a brake that harvests energy while the spacecraft accelerates.

This technique is analogous to fishing on Earth. Imagine you're on a boat on a lake with a fishing pole, and want to catch a big fish. Once the fish bites, you would release more of the line with a moderate tension, rather than holding it tightly. With a long enough line, the boat will eventually catch up with the fish.

Once the spacecraft matches its velocity to the "fish" -- the comet or asteroid in this case -- it is ready to land by simply reeling in the tether and descending gently. When it's time to move on to another celestial target, the spacecraft would use the harvested energy to quickly retrieve the tether, which accelerates the spacecraft away from the body.

"This kind of hitchhiking could be used for multiple targets in the main asteroid belt or the Kuiper Belt, even five to 10 in a single mission," Ono said.

Ono and colleagues have been studying whether a harpoon could tolerate an impact of this magnitude, and whether a tether could be created strong enough to support this kind of maneuver. They used supercomputer simulations and other analyses to figure out what it would take.

Researchers have come up with what they call the Space Hitchhike Equation, which relates the specific strength of the tether, the mass ratio between the spacecraft and the tether, and the change in velocity needed to accomplish the maneuver.

In missions that use conventional propellant, spacecraft use a lot of fuel just to accelerate enough to get into orbit.

"In Comet Hitchhiker, accelerating and decelerating do not require propellant because the spacecraft is harvesting kinetic energy from the target," Ono said.

For any spacecraft landing on a comet or asteroid, being able to slow down enough to arrive safely is critical. Comet Hitchhiker requires a tether made from a material that can withstand the enormous tension and heat generated by a rapid decrease in speed for getting into orbit and landing. Ono and colleagues calculated that a velocity change of about 0.9 miles (1.5 kilometers) per second is possible with some materials that already exist: Zylon and Kevlar.

"That's like going from Los Angeles to San Francisco in under seven minutes," Ono said.

But the bigger the velocity change required for orbit insertion, the shorter the flight time needed to get from Earth to the target -- so if you want to get to a comet or asteroid faster, you need even stronger materials. A 6.2 mile-per-second (10 kilometer-per-second) velocity change is possible, but would require more advanced technologies such as a carbon nanotube tether and a diamond harpoon.

Researchers also estimated that the tether would need to be about 62 to 620 miles long (100 to 1,000 kilometers) for the hitchhiking maneuver to work. It would also need to be extendable, and capable of absorbing jerks on it, while avoiding being damaged or cut by small meteorites.

The next steps for studying the concept would be to do more high-fidelity simulations and try casting a mini-harpoon at a target that mimics the material found on a comet or asteroid.

Comet Hitchhiker is in Phase I study through the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Program. NIAC is a program of NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate, located at the agency's headquarters in Washington. Professor David Jewitt at the University of California, Los Angeles, partnered in this research. JPL is managed by the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena for NASA.

For a complete list of the selected proposals and more information about NIAC, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov/niac

For more information about the Space Technology Mission Directorate, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov/spacetech

Media Contact

Elizabeth Landau Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. 818-354-6425 elizabeth.landau@jpl.nasa.gov


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

At Saturn, One of These Rings is not like the Others

The planet Saturn, viewed by NASA's Cassini spacecraft during its 2009 equinox.
The planet Saturn, viewed by NASA's Cassini spacecraft during its 2009 equinox. Data on how the rings cooled during this time provide insights about the nature of the ring particles. Image Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

Fast Facts:

› A study suggests the particles in one section of Saturn's rings are denser than elsewhere, possibly due to solid, icy cores.


› The findings could mean that particular ring is much younger than the rest.

When the sun set on Saturn's rings in August 2009, scientists on NASA's Cassini mission were watching closely. It was the equinox -- one of two times in the Saturnian year when the sun illuminates the planet's enormous ring system edge-on. The event provided an extraordinary opportunity for the orbiting Cassini spacecraft to observe short-lived changes in the rings that reveal details about their nature.

Like Earth, Saturn is tilted on its axis. Over the course of its 29-year-long orbit, the sun's rays move from north to south over the planet and its rings, and back again. The changing sunlight causes the temperature of the rings -- which are made of trillions of icy particles -- to vary from season to season. During equinox, which lasted only a few days, unusual shadows and wavy structures appeared and, as they sat in twilight for this brief period, the rings began to cool.

In a recent study published in the journal Icarus, a team of Cassini scientists reported that one section of the rings appears to have been running a slight fever during equinox. The higher-than-expected temperature provided a unique window into the interior structure of ring particles not usually available to scientists.

"For the most part, we can't learn much about what Saturn's ring particles are like deeper than 1 millimeter below the surface. But the fact that one part of the rings didn't cool as expected allowed us to model what they might be like on the inside," said Ryuji Morishima of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, who led the study.

The researchers examined data collected by Cassini's Composite Infrared Spectrometer during the year around equinox. The instrument essentially took the rings' temperature as they cooled. The scientists then compared the temperature data with computer models that attempt to describe the properties of ring particles on an individual scale.

What they found was puzzling. For most of the giant expanse of Saturn's rings, the models correctly predicted how the rings cooled as they fell into darkness. But one large section -- the outermost of the large, main rings, called the A ring -- was much warmer than the models predicted. The temperature spike was especially prominent in the middle of the A ring.

To address this curiosity, Morishima and colleagues performed a detailed investigation of how ring particles with different structures would warm up and cool down during Saturn's seasons. Previous studies based on Cassini data have shown Saturn's icy ring particles are fluffy on the outside, like fresh snow. This outer material, called regolith, is created over time, as tiny impacts pulverize the surface of each particle. The team's analysis suggested the best explanation for the A ring's equinox temperatures was for the ring to be composed largely of particles roughly 3 feet (1 meter) wide made of mostly solid ice, with only a thin coating of regolith.

"A high concentration of dense, solid ice chunks in this one region of Saturn's rings is unexpected," said Morishima. "Ring particles usually spread out and become evenly distributed on a timescale of about 100 million years."

The accumulation of dense ring particles in one place suggests that some process either placed the particles there in the recent geologic past or the particles are somehow being confined there. The researchers suggest a couple of possibilities to explain how this aggregation came to be. A moon may have existed at that location within the past hundred million years or so and was destroyed, perhaps by a giant impact. If so, debris from the breakup might not have had time to diffuse evenly throughout the ring. Alternatively, they posit that small, rubble-pile moonlets could be transporting the dense, icy particles as they migrate within the ring. The moonlets could disperse the icy chunks in the middle A ring as they break up there under the gravitational influence of Saturn and its larger moons.

"This particular result is fascinating because it suggests that the middle of Saturn's A ring may be much younger than the rest of the rings," said Linda Spilker, Cassini project scientist at JPL and a co-author of the study. "Other parts of the rings may be as old as Saturn itself."

During its final series of close orbits to Saturn, Cassini will directly measure the mass of the planet's main rings for the first time, using gravity science. Scientists will use the mass of the rings to place constraints on their age.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, ESA and the Italian Space Agency. JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

For more information about Cassini, visit:

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive ~ Our Origins

Image of reconstruction based on ER 3733 by John Gurche
Homo erectus, female. Reconstruction based on ER 3733 by John Gurche

Image of reconstruction based on STS 5 by John Gurche
Australopithecus africanus. Reconstruction based on STS 5 by John Gurche.

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive

Explore the evidence for human evolution in this interactive timeline - climate change, species, and milestones in becoming human.

Click below to get the interactive timeline



In paleoanthropology, the recent African origin of modern humans, or the "out of Africa" theory (OOA), is the most widely accepted model of the geographic origin and early migration of anatomically modern humans. The theory is called the "out-of-Africa" theory in the popular press, and the "recent single-origin hypothesis" (RSOH), "replacement hypothesis", or "recent African origin model" (RAO) by experts in the field. The concept was speculative before it was corroborated in the 1980s by a study of present-day mitochondrial DNA, combined with evidence based on physical anthropology of archaic specimens.

Genetic studies and fossil evidence show that archaic Homo sapiens evolved to anatomically modern humans solely in Africa between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago,[1] that members of one branch of Homo sapiens left Africa at some point between 125,000 and 60,000 years ago, and that over time these humans replaced other populations of the genus Homo such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus.[2] The date of the earliest successful "out of Africa" migration (earliest migrants with living descendants) has generally been placed at 60,000 years ago based on genetics, but migration out of the continent may have taken place as early as 125,000 years ago according to Arabian archaeological finds of tools in the region.[3]

The recent single origin of modern humans in East Africa is the predominant position held within the scientific community.[4][5][6][7][8] There are differing theories on whether there was a single exodus or several. An increasing number of researchers believe that "long-neglected North Africa"[9] may have been the original home of the first modern humans to migrate out of Africa.[10][11]

The major competing hypothesis is the multiregional origin of modern humans, which envisions a wave of Homo sapiens migrating earlier from Africa and interbreeding with local Homo erectus populations in multiple regions of the globe. Most multiregionalists still view Africa as a major wellspring of human genetic diversity, but allow a much greater role for hybridization.[12][13]

Genetic testing in the last decade has revealed that several now extinct archaic human species may have interbred with modern humans. These species have been claimed to have left their genetic imprint in different regions across the world: Neanderthals in all humans except Sub-Saharan Africans, Denisova hominin in Australasia (for example, Melanesians, Aboriginal Australians and some Negritos) and there could also have been interbreeding between Sub-Saharan Africans and an as-yet-unknown hominin (possibly remnants of the ancient species Homo heidelbergensis). However, the rate of interbreeding was found to be relatively low (1–10%) and other studies have suggested that the presence of Neanderthal or other archaic human genetic markers in modern humans can be attributed to shared ancestral traits originating from a common ancestor 500,000 to 800,000 years ago.[14][15][16][17][18]
History of the theory[edit]

Further information: Timeline of human evolution

With the development of anthropology in the early 19th century, scholars disagreed vigorously about different theories of human development. Those such as Johann Friedrich Blumenbach and James Cowles Prichard held that since the creation, the various human races had developed as different varieties sharing descent from one people (monogenism). Their opponents, such as Louis Agassiz and Josiah C. Nott, argued for polygenism, or the separate development of human races as separate species or had developed as separate species through transmutation of species from apes, with no common ancestor.


The frontispiece to Huxley's Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature (1863): the image compares the skeletons of apes to humans.
Charles Darwin was one of the first to propose common descent of living organisms, and among the first to suggest that all humans had in common ancestors who lived in Africa.[19] Darwin first suggested the "Out of Africa" hypothesis after studying the behaviour of African apes, one of which was displayed at the London Zoo. The anatomist Thomas Huxley had also supported the hypothesis and suggested that African apes have a close evolutionary relationship with humans.[20] These views were however opposed by Ernst Haeckel the German biologist who was a proponent of the Out of Asia theory. Haeckel argued that humans were more closely related to the primates of Southeast Asia and rejected Darwin’s hypothesis of Africa.[21][22]

In the Descent of Man, Darwin speculated that humans had descended from apes which still had small brains but walked upright, freeing their hands for uses which favoured intelligence. Further, he thought such apes were African:[23]

In each great region of the world the living mammals are closely related to the extinct species of the same region. It is, therefore, probable that Africa was formerly inhabited by extinct apes closely allied to the gorilla and chimpanzee; and as these two species are now man's nearest allies, it is somewhat more probable that our early progenitors lived on the African continent than elsewhere. But it is useless to speculate on this subject, for an ape nearly as large as a man, namely the Dryopithecus of Lartet, which was closely allied to the anthropomorphous Hylobates, existed in Europe during the Upper Miocene period; and since so remote a period the earth has certainly undergone many great revolutions, and there has been ample time for migration on the largest scale.

—Charles Darwin, Descent of Man[24]
The prediction was insightful, because in 1871 there were hardly any human fossils of ancient hominids available. Almost fifty years later, Darwin's speculation was supported when anthropologists began finding numerous fossils of ancient small-brained hominids in several areas of Africa (list of hominina fossils).

The debate in anthropology had swung in favour of monogenism by the mid-20th century. Isolated proponents of polygenism held forth in the mid-20th century, such as Carleton Coon, who hypothesized as late as 1962 that Homo sapiens arose five times from Homo erectus in five places.[25] The "Recent African origin" of modern humans means "single origin" (monogenism) and has been used in various contexts as an antonym to polygenism.

In the 1980s Allan Wilson together with Rebecca L. Cann and Mark Stoneking worked on the so-called "Mitochondrial Eve" hypothesis. In his efforts to identify informative genetic markers for tracking human evolutionary history, he started to focus on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) – genes that sit in the cell, but not in the nucleus, and are passed from mother to child. This DNA material is important because it mutates quickly, thus making it easy to plot changes over relatively short time spans. By comparing differences in the mtDNA Wilson believed it was possible to estimate the time, and the place, modern humans first evolved. With his discovery that human mtDNA is genetically much less diverse than chimpanzee mtDNA, he concluded that modern human populations had diverged recently from a single population while older human species such as Neandertals and Homo erectus had become extinct. He and his team compared mtDNA in people of different ancestral backgrounds and concluded that all modern humans evolved from one 'lucky mother' in Africa about 150,000 years ago.[26] With the advent of archaeogenetics in the 1990s, scientists were able to date the "out of Africa" migration with some confidence.

In 2000, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence of "Mungo Man 3" (LM3) of ancient Australia was published indicating that Mungo Man was an extinct subspecies that diverged before the most recent common ancestor of contemporary humans. The results, if correct, supports the multiregional origin of modern humans hypothesis.[27][28] This work was later questioned[29][30] and explained by W. James Peacock, leader of the team who sequenced Mungo man's aDNA.[31] In addition, a large-scale genotyping analysis of aboriginal Australians, New Guineans, Southeast Asians and Indians in 2013 showed close genetic relationship between Australian, New Guinean, and the Mamanwa people, with divergence times for these groups estimated at 36,000 y ago. Further, substantial gene flow was detected between the Indian populations and aboriginal Australians, indicating an early "southern route" migration out of Africa, and arrival of other populations in the region by subsequent dispersal. This basically opposes the view that there was an isolated human evolution in Australia.[32]

The question of whether there was inheritance of other typological (not de facto) Homo subspecies into the Homo sapiens genetic pool is debated.

Early Homo sapiens

Anatomical comparison of the skulls of a modern human(left) and Homo neanderthalensis(right).

Main articles: Anatomically modern humans and Archaic Homo sapiens

Anatomical comparison of the skulls of a modern human (left) and Homo neanderthalensis (right).
Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about 250,000 years ago. The trend in cranial expansion and the acheulean elaboration of stone tool technologies which occurred between 400,000 years ago and the second interglacial period in the Middle Pleistocene (around 250,000 years ago) provide evidence for a transition from H. erectus to H. sapiens.[33] In the Recent African Origin (RAO) scenario, migration within and out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier dispersed H. erectus.

Homo sapiens idaltu, found at site Middle Awash in Ethiopia, lived about 160,000 years ago.[34] It is the oldest known anatomically modern human and classified as an extinct subspecies.[35] Fossils of early Homo sapiens were found in Qafzeh cave in Israel and have been dated to 80,000 to 100,000 years ago. However these humans seem to have either become extinct or retreated back to Africa 70,000 to 80,000 years ago, possibly replaced by southbound Neanderthals escaping the colder regions of ice age Europe.[36] Hua Liu et al. analyzed autosomal microsatellite markers dates to c. 56,000±5,700 years ago mtDNA evidence. He interprets the paleontological fossil of early modern human from Qafzeh cave as an isolated early offshoot that retracted back to Africa.[37]

All other fossils of fully modern humans outside Africa have been dated to more recent times. The oldest well dated fossil of modern humans found outside Africa is from Manot Cave in Israel, named Manot 1, which have been dated to 54,700 years ago.[38][39] Fossils from Lake Mungo, Australia have been dated to about 42,000 years ago.[40][41] The Tianyuan cave remains in Liujiang region China have a probable date range between 38,000 and 42,000 years ago. They are most similar in morphology to Minatogawa Man, modern humans dated between 17,000 and 19,000 years ago and found on Okinawa Island, Japan.[42][43] However, others have dated Liujang Man to 111,000 to 139,000 years before the present.[44]

Beginning about 100,000 years ago evidence of more sophisticated technology and artwork begins to emerge and by 50,000 years ago fully modern behaviour becomes more prominent. Stone tools show regular patterns that are reproduced or duplicated with more precision while tools made of bone and antler appear for the first time.[45][46]

Genetic reconstruction[edit]
Further information: Most recent common ancestor and Archaeogenetics
Two pieces of the human genome are quite useful in deciphering human history: mitochondrial DNA and the Y chromosome. These are the only two parts of the genome that are not shuffled about by the evolutionary mechanisms that generate diversity with each generation: instead, these elements are passed down intact. According to the hypothesis, all people alive today have inherited the same mitochondria[47] from a woman who lived in Africa about 160,000 years ago.[48][49] She has been named Mitochondrial Eve. All men living today have inherited their Y chromosomes from a man who lived 140,000–500,000 years ago, probably in Africa. He has been named Y-chromosomal Adam. Based on comparisons of non-sex-specific chromosomes with sex-specific ones, it is now believed that more men than women participated in the out-of-Africa exodus of early humans.[50]

Mitochondrial DNA[edit]
Further information: Human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup

Map of early diversification of modern humans according to mitochondrial population genetics (see: Haplogroup L).
The first lineage to branch off from Mitochondrial Eve is L0. This haplogroup is found in high proportions among the San of Southern Africa, the Sandawe of East Africa. It is also found among the Mbuti people.[51][52]

These groups branched off early in human history and have remained relatively genetically isolated since then. Haplogroups L1, L2 and L3 are descendents of L1-6 and are largely confined to Africa. The macro haplogroups M and N, which are the lineages of the rest of the world outside Africa, descend from L3. L3 is about 84,000 years old, and haplogroup M and N are almost identical in age at about 63,000 years old. [53]

Genomic analysis[edit]
Although mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal DNA are particularly useful in deciphering human history, data on the genomes of dozens of population groups have also been studied. In June 2009, an analysis of genome-wide SNP data from the International HapMap Project (Phase II) and CEPH Human Genome Diversity Panel samples was published.[54] Those samples were taken from 1138 unrelated individuals.[54] Before this analysis, population geneticists expected to find dramatic differences among ethnic groups, with derived alleles shared among such groups but uncommon or nonexistent in other groups.[55] Instead the study of 53 populations taken from the HapMap and CEPH data revealed that the population groups studied fell into just three genetic groups: Africans, Eurasians (which includes natives of Europe and the Middle East, and Southwest Asians east to present-day Pakistan), and East Asians, which includes natives of Asia, Japan, Southeast Asia, the Americas, and Oceania.[55] The study determined that most ethnic group differences can be attributed to genetic drift, with modern African populations having greater genetic diversity than the other two genetic groups, and modern Eurasians somewhat more than modern East Asians.[55] The study suggested that natural selection may shape the human genome much more slowly than previously thought, with factors such as migration within and among continents more heavily influencing the distribution of genetic variations.[56] A May 2002 study examined three groups, African, European, and Asian. It found greater genetic diversity among Africans than among Eurasians, and that genetic diversity among Eurasians is largely a subset of that among Africans, supporting the 'out of Africa' model.[57]

Movement out of Africa

Red Sea crossing
By some 70,000 years ago, a part of the bearers of mitochondrial haplogroup L3 migrated from East Africa into the Near East. The date of this first wave of "out of Africa" migration was called into question in 2011, based on the discovery of stone tools in the United Arab Emirates, indicating the presence of modern humans between 100,000 and 125,000 years ago.[3][58] New research showing slower than previously thought genetic mutations in human DNA published in 2012, indicating a revised dating for the migration of between 90,000 and 130,000 years ago.[59]

Some scientists believe that only a few people left Africa in a single migration that went on to populate the rest of the world,[60] based in the fact that only descendents of L3 are found outside Africa. From that settlement, some others point to the possibility of several waves of expansion. For example, geneticist Spencer Wells says that the early travellers followed the southern coastline of Asia, crossed about 250 kilometres (155 mi) of sea, and colonized Australia by around 50,000 years ago. The Aborigines of Australia, Wells says, are the descendants of the first wave of migrations.[61]

It has been estimated that from a population of 2,000 to 5,000 individuals in Africa,[62] only a small group, possibly as few as 150 to 1,000 people, crossed the Red Sea.[63] Of all the lineages present in Africa only the female descendants of one lineage, mtDNA haplogroup L3, are found outside Africa. If there had been several migrations, one would expect descendants of more than one lineage to be found outside Africa. L3's female descendants, the M and N haplogroup lineages, are found in very low frequencies in Africa (although haplogroup M1 populations are very ancient and diversified in North and Northeast Africa) and appear to be more recent arrivals. A possible explanation is that these mutations occurred in East Africa shortly before the exodus and became the dominant haplogroups after the exodus from Africa through the founder effect. Alternatively, the mutations may have arisen shortly after the exodus from Africa.

Other scientists have proposed a multiple dispersal model according to which there were two migrations out of Africa, one across the Red Sea and along the coastal regions to India (the coastal route), which would be represented by haplogroup M. Another group of migrants with haplogroup N followed the Nile from East Africa, heading northwards and crossing into Asia through the Sinai. This group then branched in several directions, some moving into Europe and others heading east into Asia. This hypothesis is supported by the relatively late date of the arrival of modern humans in Europe as well as by both archaeological and DNA evidence. Results from mtDNA collected from aboriginal Malaysians called Orang Asli and the creation of a phylogentic tree indicate that the hapologroups M and N share characteristics with original African groups from approximately 85,000 years ago and share characteristics with sub-haplogroups among coastal southeast Asian regions, such as Australasia, the Indian Subcontinent, and throughout continental Asia, which had dispersed and separated from its African origins approximately 65,000 years ago. This southern coastal dispersion would have occurred before the original theory of dispersion through the Levant approximately 45,000 years ago.[64] This hypothesis attempts to explain why haplogroup N is predominant in Europe and why haplogroup M is absent in Europe. Evidence of the coastal migration is hypothesized to have been destroyed by the rise in sea levels during the Holocene epoch.[65][66] Alternatively, a small European founder population that initially expressed both haplogroup M and N could have lost haplogroup M through random genetic drift resulting from a bottleneck (i.e. a founder effect).

Today at the Bab-el-Mandeb straits, the Red Sea is about 20 kilometres (12 mi) wide, but 50,000 years ago sea levels were 70 m (230 ft) lower (owing to glaciation) and the water was much narrower. Though the straits were never completely closed, they were narrow enough and there may have been islands in between to have enabled crossing using simple rafts.[67][68] Shell middens 125,000 years old have been found in Eritrea,[69] indicating the diet of early humans included seafood obtained by beachcombing.

Subsequent expansion

Main article: Early human migrations

Map of early human migrations[70]
1. Homo sapiens
2. Neanderthals
3. Early Hominids
From the Near East, these populations spread east to South Asia by 50,000 years ago, and on to Australia by 40,000 years ago, Homo sapiens for the first time colonizing territory never reached by Homo erectus. Europe was reached by Cro-Magnon some 40,000 years ago. East Asia (Korea, Japan) was reached by 30,000 years ago. It is disputed whether subsequent migration to North America took place around 30,000 years ago, or only considerably later, around 14,000 years ago.[71]

The group that crossed the Red Sea travelled along the coastal route around the coast of Arabia and Persia until reaching India, which appears to be the first major settling point. Haplogroup M is found in high frequencies along the southern coastal regions of Pakistan and India and it has the greatest diversity in India, indicating that it is here where the mutation may have occurred.[72] Sixty percent of the Indian population belong to Haplogroup M.

The indigenous people of the Andaman Islands also belong to the M lineage. The Andamanese are thought to be offshoots of some of the earliest inhabitants in Asia because of their long isolation from mainland Asia. They are evidence of the coastal route of early settlers that extends from India along the coasts of Thailand and Indonesia all the way to Papua New Guinea. Since M is found in high frequencies in highlanders from New Guinea as well, and both the Andamanese and New Guineans have dark skin and Afro-textured hair, some scientists believe they are all part of the same wave of migrants who departed across the Red Sea ~60,000 years ago in the Great Coastal Migration.

Notably, the findings of Harding et al.[73] show that, at least with regard to dark skin color, the haplotype background of Papua New Guineans at MC1R (one of a number of genes involved in melanin production) is identical to that of Africans (barring a single silent mutation). Thus, although these groups are distinct from Africans at other loci (due to drift, bottlenecks, etc.), it is evident that selection for the dark skin color trait likely continued (at least at MC1R) following the exodus. This would support the hypothesis that suggests that the original migrants from Africa resembled pre-exodus Africans (at least in skin color), and that the present day remnants of this ancient phenotype can be seen among contemporary Africans, Andamanese and New Guineans. Others suggest that their physical resemblance to Africans could be the result of convergent evolution.[74][75]

From Arabia to India the proportion of haplogroup M increases eastwards: in eastern India, M outnumbers N by a ratio of 3:1. However, crossing over into East Asia, Haplogroup N reappears as the dominant lineage. M is predominant in South East Asia but amongst Indigenous Australians N reemerges as the more common lineage. This discontinuous distribution of Haplogroup N from Europe to Australia can be explained by founder effects and population bottlenecks.[76] In addition to genetic analysis, Petraglia et al. also examines the microlithic materials from Indian subcontinent and explains the expansion of population based on the reconstruction of paleoenvironment. He proposed that microlithic industries could be traced back to 35ka in South Asia, and the new technology might be influenced by environmental change and population pressure.[77]

Competing hypotheses

Main article: Multi-regional origin of modern humans
The multiregional hypothesis, initially proposed by Milford Wolpoff, holds that the evolution of humans from H. erectus at the beginning of the Pleistocene 1.8 million years BP has been within a single, continuous worldwide population. Proponents of multiregional origin reject the assumption of an infertility barrier between ancient Eurasian and African populations of Homo. Multiregional proponents point to the fossil record and genetic evidence in chromosomal DNA. One study suggested that at least 5% of the human modern gene pool can be attributed to ancient admixture, which in Europe would be from the Neanderthals.[78] But the study also suggests that there may be other reasons why humans and Neanderthals share ancient genetic lineages.[79][80]



Image of male Neanderthal reconstruction based on Shanidar 1 by John Gurche
Homo neanderthalensis, adult male. Reconstruction based on Shanidar 1 by John Gurche


Image of a male reconstruction based on Kabwe by John Gurche
Homo heidelbergensis, male.  Reconstruction based on Kabwe by John Gurche

Image of male reconstruction based on AL444-2 by John Gurche. 3/4 view
Australopithecus afarensis, adult male.  Reconstruction based on AL444-2 by John Gurche. 

Image of male reconstruction based on OH 5 & KNM-ER 406 by John Gurche
Paranthropus boisei, male.  Reconstruction based on OH 5 and KNM-ER 406 by John Gurche


References

 Reid GBR, Hetherington R (2010). The climate connection: climate change and modern human evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 64. ISBN 0-521-14723-9.
Jump up ^ Meredith M (2011). Born in Africa: The Quest for the Origins of Human Life. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 1-58648-663-2.
^ Jump up to: a b Armitage SJ, Jasim SA, Marks AE, Parker AG, Usik VI, Uerpmann HP; Jasim; Marks; Parker; Usik; Uerpmann (January 2011). "The southern route "out of Africa": evidence for an early expansion of modern humans into Arabia". Science 331 (6016): 453–6. Bibcode:2011Sci...331..453A. doi:10.1126/science.1199113. PMID 21273486.
Jump up ^ Liu H, Prugnolle F, Manica A, Balloux F; Prugnolle; Manica; Balloux (August 2006). "A geographically explicit genetic model of worldwide human-settlement history". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79 (2): 230–7. doi:10.1086/505436. PMC 1559480. PMID 16826514. Currently available genetic and archaeological evidence is supportive of a recent single origin of modern humans in East Africa. However, this is where the consensus on human settlement history ends, and considerable uncertainty clouds any more detailed aspect of human colonization history.
Jump up ^ "This week in Science: Out of Africa Revisited". Science 308 (5724): 921. 2005-05-13. doi:10.1126/science.308.5724.921g.
Jump up ^ Stringer C (June 2003). "Human evolution: Out of Ethiopia". Nature 423 (6941): 692–3, 695. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..692S. doi:10.1038/423692a. PMID 12802315.
Jump up ^ Johanson D. "Origins of Modern Humans: Multiregional or Out of Africa?". ActionBioscience. American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Jump up ^ "Modern Humans – Single Origin (Out of Africa) vs Multiregional".
Jump up ^ Balter M (January 2011). "Was North Africa the launch pad for modern human migrations?" (PDF). Science 331 (6013): 20–3. Bibcode:2011Sci...331...20B. doi:10.1126/science.331.6013.20. PMID 21212332.
Jump up ^ Cruciani F, Trombetta B, Massaia A, Destro-Bisol G, Sellitto D, Scozzari R; Trombetta; Massaia; Destro-Bisol; Sellitto; Scozzari (June 2011). "A revised root for the human Y chromosomal phylogenetic tree: the origin of patrilineal diversity in Africa". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88 (6): 814–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.002. PMC 3113241. PMID 21601174.
Jump up ^ Smith TM, Tafforeau P, Reid DJ, Grün R, Eggins S, Boutakiout M, Hublin JJ; Tafforeau; Reid; Grün; Eggins; Boutakiout; Hublin (April 2007). "Earliest evidence of modern human life history in North African early Homo sapiens". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (15): 6128–33. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.6128S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700747104. PMC 1828706. PMID 17372199.
Jump up ^ Robert Jurmain; Lynn Kilgore; Wenda Trevathan (20 March 2008). Essentials of Physical Anthropology. Cengage Learning. pp. 266–. ISBN 978-0-495-50939-4. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
Jump up ^ Wolpoff MH, Hawks J, Caspari R; Hawks; Caspari (May 2000). "Multiregional, not multiple origins". Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 112 (1): 129–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200005)112:1<129::aid-ajpa11>3.0.CO;2-K. PMID 10766948.
 [1] http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/feb/04/neanderthals-modern-humans-research
 [2] The Human Stew
 http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1002837
Jump up ^ Peter Lafreniere (22 September 2010). Adaptive Origins: Evolution and Human Development. Taylor & Francis. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-8058-6012-2. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
Jump up ^ Robinson D, Ash PM (2010). The Emergence of Humans: An Exploration of the Evolutionary Timeline. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-470-01315-X.
Jump up ^ Palmer D (2006). Prehistoric Past Revealed: The Four Billion Year History of Life on Earth. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 43. ISBN 0-520-24827-9.
Jump up ^ Regal B (2004). Human evolution: a guide to the debates. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO. pp. 73–75. ISBN 1-85109-418-0.
Jump up ^ Bowler 2003, p. 213
Jump up ^ "The descent of man Chapter 6 – On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man". Darwin-online.org.uk. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ Jackson JP Jr (2001). ""In Ways Unacademical": The Reception of Carleton S. Coon's The Origin of Races" (pdf). Journal of the History of Biology 34 (2): 247–285. doi:10.1023/A:1010366015968.
Jump up ^ "Allan Wilson: Revolutionary Evolutionist". New Zealanders Heroes.
Jump up ^ Adcock GJ, Dennis ES, Easteal S, Huttley GA, Jermiin LS, Peacock WJ, Thorne A; Dennis; Easteal; Huttley; Jermiin; Peacock; Thorne (January 2001). "Mitochondrial DNA sequences in ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2): 537–42. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98..537A. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.537. PMC 14622. PMID 11209053.
Jump up ^ Australia Challenges Out-of-Africa Theory ABC News January 9, 2003
Jump up ^ Cooper A, Rambaut A, Macaulay V, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Stringer C; Rambaut; MacAulay; Willerslev; Hansen; Stringer (June 2001). "Human origins and ancient human DNA". Science 292 (5522): 1655–6. doi:10.1126/science.292.5522.1655. PMID 11388352.
Jump up ^ Smith CI, Chamberlain AT, Riley MS, Stringer C, Collins MJ; Chamberlain; Riley; Stringer; Collins (September 2003). "The thermal history of human fossils and the likelihood of successful DNA amplification" (PDF). J. Hum. Evol. 45 (3): 203–17. doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00106-4. PMID 14580590.
Jump up ^ Schiller J (2010). Human Evolution: Neanderthals & Homo sapiens. CreateSpace. p. 66. ISBN 978-1-4515-4608-8. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
Jump up ^ Pugach I, Delfin F, Gunnarsdóttir E, Kayser M, Stoneking M; Delfin; Gunnarsdóttir; Kayser; Stoneking (2013). "Genome-wide data substantiate Holocene gene flow from India to Australia". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (5): 1803–1808. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.1803P. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211927110. PMC 3562786. PMID 23319617.
Jump up ^ Eric Delson; Ian Tattersall; John A. Van Couvering (2000). Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory. Taylor & Francis. p. 677–. ISBN 978-0-8153-1696-1. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
Jump up ^ White TD, Asfaw B, DeGusta D, Gilbert H, Richards GD, Suwa G, Howell FC; Asfaw; Degusta; Gilbert; Richards; Suwa; Howell (June 2003). "Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia". Nature 423 (6941): 742–7. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..742W. doi:10.1038/nature01669. PMID 12802332.
Jump up ^ "160,000-year-old fossilized skulls uncovered in Ethiopia are oldest anatomically modern humans". University of California, Berkeley. 2003.
Jump up ^ Clive Finlayson (11 October 2009). The humans who went extinct: why Neanderthals died out and we survived. Oxford University Press US. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-19-923918-4. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
Jump up ^ Liu H, Prugnolle F, Manica A, Balloux F; Prugnolle; Manica; Balloux (August 2006). "A geographically explicit genetic model of worldwide human-settlement history". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79 (2): 230–7. doi:10.1086/505436. PMC 1559480. PMID 16826514.
Jump up ^ Hershkovitz, Israel; Marder, Ofer; Ayalon, Avner; Bar-Matthews, Miryam; Yasur, Gal; Boaretto, Elisabetta; Caracuta, Valentina; Alex, Bridget et al. (2015). "Levantine cranium from Manot Cave (Israel) foreshadows the first European modern humans". Nature. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1038/nature14134. PMID 25629628.
Jump up ^ "55,000-Year-Old Skull Fossil Sheds New Light on Human Migration out of Africa". Science News. Retrieved 2 February 2015.
Jump up ^ Bowler JM, Johnston H, Olley JM, Prescott JR, Roberts RG, Shawcross W, Spooner NA.; Johnston; Olley; Prescott; Roberts; Shawcross; Spooner (2003). "New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia". Nature 421 (6925): 837–40. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..837B. doi:10.1038/nature01383. PMID 1259451.
Jump up ^ Olleya JM, Roberts RG, Yoshida H and Bowler JM (2006). "Single-grain optical dating of grave-infill associated with human burials at Lake Mungo, Australia". Quaternary Science Reviews 25 (19–20): 2469–2474. Bibcode:2006QSRv...25.2469O. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.022.

Jump up ^ Hu Y, Shang H, Tong H, Nehlich O, Liu W, Zhao C, Yu J, Wang C, Trinkaus E, Richards MP; Shang; Tong; Nehlich; Liu; Zhao; Yu; Wang; Trinkaus; Richards (July 2009). "Stable isotope dietary analysis of the Tianyuan 1 early modern human". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (27): 10971–4. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10610971H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904826106. PMC 2706269. PMID 19581579.
Jump up ^ Brown P (August 1992). "Recent human evolution in East Asia and Australasia". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 337 (1280): 235–42. doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0101. PMID 1357698.
Jump up ^ Shen G, Wang W, Wang Q, Zhao J, Collerson K, Zhou C, Tobias PV; Wang; Wang; Zhao; Collerson; Zhou; Tobias (December 2002). "U-Series dating of Liujiang hominid site in Guangxi, Southern China". J. Hum. Evol. 43 (6): 817–29. doi:10.1006/jhev.2002.0601. PMID 12473485.
Jump up ^ "Ancestral tools". Handprint.com. 1999-08-01. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ "Middle to upper paleolithic transition". Wsu.edu. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ Jones, Marie; John Savino (2007). Supervolcano: The Catastrophic Event That Changed the Course of Human History (Could Yellowstone be Next?). Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books. ISBN 1-56414-953-6.
Jump up ^ Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC; Stoneking; Wilson (1987). "Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution". Nature 325 (6099): 31–6. Bibcode:1987Natur.325...31C. doi:10.1038/325031a0. PMID 3025745.
Jump up ^ Vigilant L, Stoneking M, Harpending H, Hawkes K, Wilson AC; Stoneking; Harpending; Hawkes; Wilson (September 1991). "African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA". Science 253 (5027): 1503–7. Bibcode:1991Sci...253.1503V. doi:10.1126/science.1840702. PMID 1840702.
Jump up ^ Keinan A, Mullikin JC, Patterson N, Reich D; Mullikin; Patterson; Reich (January 2009). "Accelerated genetic drift on chromosome X during the human dispersal out of Africa". Nat. Genet. 41 (1): 66–70. doi:10.1038/ng.303. PMC 2612098. PMID 19098910.
Jump up ^ Gonder MK, Mortensen HM, Reed FA, de Sousa A, Tishkoff SA; Mortensen; Reed; De Sousa; Tishkoff (March 2007). "Whole-mtDNA genome sequence analysis of ancient African lineages". Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (3): 757–68. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl209. PMID 17194802.
Jump up ^ Chen YS, Olckers A, Schurr TG, Kogelnik AM, Huoponen K, Wallace DC; Olckers; Schurr; Kogelnik; Huoponen; Wallace (April 2000). "mtDNA variation in the South African Kung and Khwe-and their genetic relationships to other African populations". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66 (4): 1362–83. doi:10.1086/302848. PMC 1288201. PMID 10739760.
Jump up ^ Macaulay, V; Hill, C; Achilli, A; Rengo, C; Clarke, D; Meehan, W; Blackburn, J; Semino, O; Scozzari, R et al. (2005). "Single, Rapid Coastal Settlement of Asia Revealed by Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes". Science 308 (5724): 1034–6. doi:10.1126/science.1109792. PMID 15890885.
^ Jump up to: a b Coop G, Pickrell, Novembre, Kudaravalli, Li, Absher, Myers, Cavalli-Sforza, Feldman, Pritchard (June 2009). Schierup MH, ed. "The role of geography in human adaptation". PLoS Genet. 5 (6): e1000500. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000500. PMC 2685456. PMID 19503611.
^ Jump up to: a b c Brown, David (June 22, 2009). "Among Many Peoples, Little Genomic Variety". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-06-25.
Jump up ^ "Geography And History Shape Genetic Differences In Humans". Science Daily. June 7, 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-25.
Jump up ^ Yu, Ning et al. (May 2002). "Larger Genetic Differences Within Africans Than Between Africans and Eurasians". Genetics (Genetics Society of America). Retrieved 7 April 2013.
Jump up ^ "Humans may have left Africa earlier than thought". Apnews.myway.com. Retrieved 2011-06-14.
Jump up ^ Catherine Brahic (24 Nov 2012). "Our True Dawn". New Scientist (Reed Business Information) (2892): 34–7. ISSN 0262-4079.
Jump up ^ "Both Australian Aborigines and Europeans Rooted in Africa". News.softpedia.com. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ Rincon, Paul (April 24, 2008). "Human line 'nearly split in two'". BBC News. Retrieved 2009-12-31.
Jump up ^ Zhivotovsky; Rosenberg, NA; Feldman, MW et al. (2003). "Features of Evolution and Expansion of Modern Humans, Inferred from Genomewide Microsatellite Markers". American Journal of Human Genetics 72 (5): 1171–86. doi:10.1086/375120. PMC 1180270. PMID 12690579.
Jump up ^ Stix, Gary (2008). "The Migration History of Humans: DNA Study Traces Human Origins Across the Continents". Retrieved 2011-06-14.
Jump up ^ Macaulay V, Hill C, Achilli A, Rengo C, Clarke D, Meehan W, Blackburn J, Semino O, Scozzari R, Cruciani F, Taha A, Shaari NK, Raja JM, Ismail P, Zainuddin Z, Goodwin W, Bulbeck D, Bandelt H-J, Oppenheimer S, Torroni A and Richards M. (2005). Single, Rapid Coastal Settlement of Asia Revealed by Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes. doi:10.1126/science.1109792
Jump up ^ Searching for traces of the Southern Dispersal, by Dr. Marta Mirazón Lahr, et al.
Jump up ^ "A single origin, several dispersal hypothesis". Biomedcentral.com. 2004-10-29. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ Fernandes et. al (June 2006). "Absence of post-Miocene Red Sea land bridges: biogeographic implications". Journal of Biogeography 33 (6): 961–966. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01478.x.
Jump up ^ Beyin, Amanuel (February 2011). "Upper Pleistocene Human Dispersals out of Africa: A Review of the Current State of the Debate". International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2011 (615094): 1–17. doi:10.4061/2011/615094.
Jump up ^ Walter RC, Buffler RT, Bruggemann JH, Guillaume MM, Berhe SM, Negassi B, Libsekal Y, Cheng H, Edwards RL, von Cosel R, Néraudeau D, Gagnon M (May 2000). "Early human occupation of the Red Sea coast of Eritrea during the last interglacial". Nature 405 (6782): 65–9. doi:10.1038/35011048. PMID 10811218.
Jump up ^ Literature: Göran Burenhult: Die ersten Menschen, Weltbild Verlag, 2000. ISBN 3-8289-0741-5
Jump up ^ Goebel, Ted; Waters, Michael R.; O'Rourke, Dennis H. (2008). "The Late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas" (PDF). Science 319 (5869): 1497–1502. doi:10.1126/science.1153569. PMID 18339930. Retrieved 2010-02-05.
Jump up ^ Metspalu M, Kivisild T, Metspalu E, Parik J, Hudjashov G, Kaldma K, Serk P, Karmin M, Behar DM, Gilbert MT, Endicott P, Mastana S, Papiha SS, Skorecki K, Torroni A, Villems R (August 2004). "Most of the extant mtDNA boundaries in south and southwest Asia were likely shaped during the initial settlement of Eurasia by anatomically modern humans". BMC Genet. 5: 26. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-5-26. PMC 516768. PMID 15339343.
Jump up ^ Harding, et al. 2000, p. 1355
Jump up ^ "Evolution of Human Languages". Ehl.santafe.edu. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
Jump up ^ Endicott P, Gilbert MT, Stringer C, Lalueza-Fox C, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Cooper A (January 2003). "The genetic origins of the Andaman Islanders". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72 (1): 178–84. doi:10.1086/345487. PMC 378623. PMID 12478481.
Jump up ^ Ingman M, Gyllensten U (July 2003). "Mitochondrial genome variation and evolutionary history of Australian and New Guinean aborigines". Genome Res. 13 (7): 1600–6. doi:10.1101/gr.686603. PMC 403733. PMID 12840039.
Jump up ^ Petraglia, M.; Clarkson, C.; Boivin, N.; Haslam, M.; Korisettar, R.; Chaubey, G.; Arnold, L. (2009). "Population increase and environmental deterioration correspond with microlithic innovations in South Asia ca. 35,000 years ago". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (30): 12261–12266. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810842106.
Jump up ^ Plagnol V, Wall JD (July 2006). "Possible ancestral structure in human populations". PLoS Genet. 2 (7): e105. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020105. PMC 1523253. PMID 16895447. ..strong evidence for ancient admixture in both a European and a West African population (p ≈ 10−7), with contributions to the modern gene pool of at least 5%. While Neanderthals form an obvious archaic source population candidate in Europe..
Jump up ^ Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW et al. (May 2010). "A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome". Science 328 (5979): 710–22. Bibcode:2010Sci...328..710G. doi:10.1126/science.1188021. PMID 20448178. Lay summary – BBC News.
Jump up ^ Blum MG, Jakobsson M (October 2010). "Deep divergences of human gene trees and models of human origins". Mol. Biol. Evol. 28 (2): 889–98. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq265. PMID 20930054.